Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:13:15.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Verification and Validation Testing of Engineering Designs in Underground Rock Laboratories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2012

Eleanor M. Scourse ,
Wolfgang Kickmaier ,
Ian G. McKinley ,
Hideki Kawamura  and
Samuel T. Stephens
Eleanor M. Scourse
Affiliation:
MCM, Baden, Switzerland
Wolfgang Kickmaier
Affiliation:
MCM, Baden, Switzerland
Ian G. McKinley
Affiliation:
MCM, Baden, Switzerland
Hideki Kawamura
Affiliation:
Obayashi, Tokyo, Japan
Samuel T. Stephens
Affiliation:
Atkins, Bristol, UK
Get access

Abstract

Several national programs for geological disposal of higher activity radioactive waste will initiate siting via a call for volunteers. This is probably furthest advanced in Japan (NUMO) and the UK (NDA RWMD). In both these cases, rather than focusing on a reference repository concept, a catalogue of options has been developed. This requires a process to tailor design options to sites and compare particular design/site combinations as part of the site selection process. As has been noted in the longer-running Japanese program, the assessment of options must be as realistic as possible, rather than conservative, as in past nominating approaches to siting. Past demonstration work has focused on feasibility, showing that it is possible to implement a design. Determining practicality, which incorporates many more complex factors, is more difficult. Extensive desk studies can form a basis for such analysis but these must be rigorously tested, which makes full-scale tests in Underground Rock Laboratories (URLs) an essential component of any program. This paper highlights the importance of such demonstration projects and illustrates how they are vital in both improving understanding of the engineered barrier system and stakeholder engagement.

Keywords

Higher activity wasteRepository designConcept testingURLVolunteer siting
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-p31
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. NUMO ‘Development of Repository Concepts for Volunteer Siting Environments’ Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan, TR 03–04 (2004)Google Scholar
2. NDA RWMD ‘Geological Disposal, Generic Disposal Facility Designs’ NDA Report No: NDA/RWMD/048 (2010)Google Scholar
3. Andersson, C., et al. . ‘Full-Scale Testing of the KBS-3V Concept for the Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste Prototype Repository Final Report’ Euratom EUR 21924 (2005)Google Scholar
4. Enresa ‘FEBEX-Project, Final report. Full-scale engineered barriers experiment for a deep geological repository for high level radioactive waste in crystalline host rock’ PUBLICACION TECNICA 01/2000 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Mayor, J.C. ‘Large-scale demonstration experiments at Mont Terri rock laboratory’ Mont Terri Project - Proceedings of the 10 Year Anniversary Workshop, pp 73–77, Rep. Swiss Geol. Surv. 2 (2007)Google Scholar
6. Bernier, F., Demarche, M., ‘The PRACLAY demonstration and confirmation experiments’ ICEM’07: 11. International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Bruges (Belgium) (2007)Google Scholar
7. Volckaert, G., Dereeper, B., Put, M., Ortiz, L., Gens, A., Vaunat, J., Villar, M.V., Martin, P.L., Imbert, C., Lassabatère, R., Mouche, E., and Cany, F. ‘ A large-scale in-situ demonstration test for repository sealing in an argillaceous host rock . RESEAL project - Phase I.’ European Commission, Luxembourg, EUR 19612, 273 pp (2000)Google Scholar
8. Bollingerfehr, W., Filbert, W., Wehrmann, J., Bosgiraud, J.M. ‘New Transport and Emplacement Technologies for Vitrified Waste and Spent Fuel Canisters’ Euradwaste ’08 conference 20-23, Luxembourg (2008)Google Scholar
9. Alexander, W.R., McKinley, L.E., McKinley, I.G. ‘A look to the future.’ In Alexander, W.R. & McKinley, L.E., (Eds.) 2007: Deep geological disposal of radioactive waste , Elsevier, pp. 250–264 (2007)10.1016/S1569-4860(06)09010-3Google Scholar
10. Kawamura, K., McKinley, I.G. ‘Integrated Safety Case Development for Deep Geological Disposal’ Proc. ESDRED workshop, Andra, 9-1 – 9–10 (2008)Google Scholar