Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:08:17.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which elements are useful for understanding the composition of ancient papyrus inks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2017

D. B. Gore*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
M. Choat
Affiliation:
Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
D. E. Jacob
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
G. Gloy
Affiliation:
Bruker Nano Analytics, Vic 3072, Australia
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: damian.gore@mq.edu.au

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence spectrometry was used in mapping and spot analysis modes, to help identify which elements are useful for understanding the composition of ancient papyrus inks, for 25 papyri from four age groups. We report seven elements (Al, Si, P, S, Ca, Ti, Fe) which provide sufficient contrast to be useful for mapping analysis, and 16 elements (P, S, Cl, K, Ca, V, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Nb, Ag, Ba, and Pb) which show significant differences through time. Only one element – Pb – showed sufficient contrast in the thin ink layer to be significantly different when measured on the ink and adjacent papyrus. There is greater complexity in the elemental compositions of the papyrus and ink than can be understood with a study this size and additional work is required to develop and explain the patterns observed here.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brun, E., Cotte, M., Wright, J., Ruat, M., Tack, P., Vincze, L., Ferrero, C., Delattre, D., and Mocella, V. (2016). “Revealing metallic ink in Herculaneum Papyri,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 37513754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiavari, G., Montalbani, S., Prati, S., Keheyan, Y., and Baroni, S. (2007). “Application of analytical pyrolysis for the characterisation of old inks,” J. Anal. App. Pyrol. 80, 400405.Google Scholar
Cockle, W. (1983). “Restoring and conserving Papyri,” Bull. Inst. Classical Stud. 30, 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, V. and Leach, B. (2004). “The occurrence and alteration of realgar on Ancient Egyptian Papyri,” Stud. Cons. 49, 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delange, E., Grange, M., Kusko, B., and Menei, E. (1990). “Apparition de l'encre métallogallique en Egypte à partir de la collection de papyrus du Louvre,” Revue d'Egyptologie 41, 213217.Google Scholar
Edmonds, T. E. (1998). “An indicator of its time: two millennia of the iron–gall-nut test,” Analyst 123, 29092914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faubel, W., Staub, S., Simon, R., Heissler, S., Pataki, A., and Banik, G. (2007). “Non-destructive analysis for the investigation of decomposition phenomena of historical manuscripts and prints,” Spectrochim. Acta B 62, 669676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goler, S., Yardley, J. T., Cacciola, A., Hagadorn, A., Ratzan, D., and Bagnall, R. (2016). “Characterizing the age of ancient Egyptian manuscripts through micro-Raman spectroscopy,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 47, 11851193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goltz, D. M. (2012). “A review of instrumental approaches for studying historical inks,” Anal. Lett. 45, 314329.Google Scholar
Hahn, O. (2010). “Analyses of iron gall and carbon inks by means of X-ray fluorescence analysis. A non-destructive approach in the field of archaeometry and conservation science,” Restaurator 31, 4164.Google Scholar
Hahn, O., Malzer, W., Kanngießer, B., and Beckhoff, B. (2004). “Characterization of Iron Gall inks in historical manuscripts using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry,” X-Ray Spectrom. 33, 234239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochleitner, B., Desnica, V., Mantler, M., and Schreiner, M. (2003). “Historical pigments: a collection analyzed with X-ray diffraction analysis and X-ray fluorescence analysis in order to create a database,” Spectrochim. Acta B 58, 641649.Google Scholar
Krutzsch, M. and Rabin, I. (2015). “Material criteria and their clues for dating,” New Test. Stud. 61, 356367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, B. (2005). “Mounting Papyri at the British Museum,” in Art on Paper: Mounting and Housing, edited by. Rayner, J., Kosek, J., and Christensen, B. (Archetype Press, London), pp. 193198.Google Scholar
Nesměrák, K. and Němcová, I. (2012). “Dating of historical manuscripts using spectrometric methods: a mini-review,” Anal. Lett. 45, 330344.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. M. B., Calligaro, T., Colinart, S., Dran, J. C., Lövenstam, N. E. G., Moignart, B., and Salomon, J. (2001). “Micro-PIXE analysis of an ancient Egyptian papyrus: identification of pigments used for the “Book of the Dead”,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 181, 707714.Google Scholar
Rabin, I. (2013). “Archaeometry of the dead sea scrolls,” Dead Sea Discov. 20, 124142.Google Scholar
Rabin, I., Hahn, O., Wolff, T., Masic, A., and Weinberg, G. (2009). “On the origin of the ink of the Thanksgiving Scroll (1QHodayota),” Dead Sea Discov. 16, 97106.Google Scholar
Tack, P., Cotte, M., Bauters, S., Brun, E., Banerjee, D., Bras, W., Ferrero, C., Delattre, D., Mocella, V., and Vincze, L. (2016). “Tracking ink composition on Herculaneum papyrus scrolls: quantification and speciation of lead by X-ray based techniques and Monte Carlo simulations,” Sci. Rep. 6, 20763. doi: 10.1038/srep20763.Google Scholar
Wagner, B., Donten, M. L., Donten, M., Bulska, E., Jackowska, A., and Sobucki, W. (2007). “Analytical approach to the conservation of the ancient Egyptian manuscript “Bakai Book of the Dead”: a case study,” Microchim. Acta 159, 101108.Google Scholar