Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T17:52:47.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new species of Contracaecum (Nematoda: Anisakidae) found parasitizing Nannopterum brasilianus (Suliformes: Phalacrocoracidae) and Hoplias argentinensis (Characiformes: Erythrinidae) in South America: morphological and molecular characterization of larval and adult stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

C.J. Sardella
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, km 7, 23890-000Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
M. Mancini
Affiliation:
Ecología y Acuicultura, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Argentina
V. Salinas
Affiliation:
Ecología y Acuicultura, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Argentina
R.O. Simões
Affiliation:
Departamento de Parasitologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, 23851-970Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
J.L. Luque*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Parasitologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, 23851-970Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: J.L. Luque, E-mail: luqueufrrj@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nematode species of the genus Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 have been reported around the world in many species of fish-eating birds and seals. Here, Contracaecum jorgei n. sp. is morphologically described using light and scanning electron microscopy for adults and fourth-stage larvae (L4) found in the bird Nannopterum brasilianus and third-stage larvae (L3) found in the freshwater fish Hoplias argentinensis, both from the province of Córdoba, Argentina. Additionally, sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit II were obtained from these specimens and molecular phylogenetic analysis was used to determine its relationships within the genus. The present species is distinguished from other species by the number and disposition of cephalic papillae; shape and size of the interlabia; length of the spicules; and number and arrangement of papillae in the posterior end of the male. Furthermore, in the molecular analyses, sequences obtained from adult L4 and L3 specimens of C. jorgei n. sp. were similar and grouped, forming an independent lineage, thus confirming it as a distinct species. Thus, morphological characteristics associated with molecular data support the proposal of a new species.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Adults of Contracaecum jorgei n. sp. (A) Anterior end, dorsoventral view showing lips, cephalic collar, cephalic papilla, nerve ring, oesophagus, intestinal cecum, ventriculus and ventricular appendix. (B) Dorsal and ventrolateral lips, interlabia and cephalic collar. (C) Male, posterior end showing pre- and postcloacal papilla distribution, spicules and cloaca. (D) Female, posterior end showing cloaca and phasmid. (E) Female, median region of the body, vulva.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Larvae of Contracaecum jorgei n. sp. (A) Fourth larval stage, anterior end, lateral view showing cephalic collar, cephalic papilla, nerve ring, oesophagus, intestinal cecum, ventriculus and ventricular appendix. (B) Fourth larval stage, posterior end showing a small projection with cuticle striated transversely. (C) Fourth larval stage, dorsal and ventrolateral lips, cephalic collar and cephalic papilla. (D) Third larval stage, anterior end, lateral view showing larval tooth, cuticle striated transversely, nerve ring, oesophagus, intestinal cecum, ventriculus and ventricular appendix. (E) Third larval stage, posterior end showing a small projection with cuticle striated transversely.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscopy of adults of Contracaecum jorgei n. sp. (A) Male, anterior end, lateral view showing cephalic collar and deirid. (B) Detail showing deirid. (C) Female, anterior end showing dorsal and ventrolateral lips, interlabia (arrow) and sensory pit (*). (D) Female, ventrolateral lip showing one large double papilla (arrow), one externo-lateral papilla (*) and amphid (a). (E) Female, posterior end showing conical tail with pointed tip. (F) Male, posterior end showing precloacal and postcloacal papillae, spicules and conical tail with pointed tip. (G) Distal spicule end, lateral view. (H) Male, ventral view posterior end showing precloacal papillae, postcloacal papillae and median papillae (arrow). (I) Male, ventral view showing postcloacal papillae. Abbreviations: d, deirid; p, phasmid; a1, proximal papilla pair; a2, paracloacal papilla pair; a3 and a4, distal subventral papillae; a5 and a6, distal sublateral papillae.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of larval stages of Contracaecum jorgei n. sp. (A) Fourth-stage larvae, anterior end, lateral view showing cephalic extremity rounded with three well-developed lips (one dorsal and two ventrolateral), auricles (arrow) and cephalic papillae of ventrolateral lip. (B) Fourth-stage larvae, posterior end showing conical tail with pointed tip. (C) Third-stage larvae, anterior end, lateral view showing cephalic extremity rounded with one lip with a small larval tooth (arrow). (D) Third-stage larvae, detail showing larval tooth. (E) Third-stage larvae, posterior end showing cloacal opening. (F) Third-stage larvae, detail showing conical tail with pointed tip.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic relationships within the Contracaecum genus based on the partial fragment of cytochrome oxidase II gene. The tree was inferred by using the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) with the HKY + I + G model. The nodal support is described at the left by bootstrap replicates and at the right by posterior probability to each node represented. *Low nodal support in ML or BI; **incongruence between ML and BI. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.