Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:40:55.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of back vowels before /r/ in the American Inland North

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2007

Michael J. Clark  and
James M. Hillenbrand
Michael J. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology Western Michigan Universitymichael.clark@wmich.edujames.hillenbrand@wmich.edu
James M. Hillenbrand
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology Western Michigan Universitymichael.clark@wmich.edujames.hillenbrand@wmich.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three American English diphthongs involving onsets in the back of the vowel space were investigated by means of acoustic measurements, discriminant analysis, and perceptual experiments. These diphthongs, termed DOOR/WAR, TOY, and STAR, were observed in the speech of ten young women residing in southern Michigan. The diphthongs were elicited in a variety of /b/-, /ɡ/-, and /h/-initial words (e.g. board, Boyd, and barred). Words with similar consonantal margins but different nuclei (e.g. bode, baud, and bod) were elicited, as well. The DOOR/WAR and TOY words were compared with bode and baud (and similar words with initial /ɡ/ and /h/), while the STAR words were compared with baud and bod (and similar words with initial /ɡ/ and /h/). All three methods of investigation showed that the initial part of the DOOR/WAR and TOY diphthongs more closely resembles that of bode than baud. On the other hand, the initial part of the STAR diphthong was shown to be intermediate between that of baud and that of bod.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 275 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carr, P. (1999). English Phonetics and Phonology: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, M. J. & Hillenbrand, J. M. (2003). Quality of American English front vowels before /r/. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 33 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrey, B., Potts, G. F. & Niedzielski, N. A. (2005). Effects of dialect on merger perception: ERP and behavioral correlates. Brain and Language 95, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J. & Houde, R. A. (2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (6), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J. & Nearey, T. M. (2001). Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 (2), 748–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, J. M. & Gayvert, R. T. (2005). Open-source software for experiment design and control. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J. & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (5), 3099–3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, J. M. & Nearey, T. M. (1999). Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (6), 3509–3523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R. A. & Winchern, D. W. (1982). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kameny, I. (1975). Comparison of the formant spaces of retroflexed and nonretroflexed vowels. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP 23 (1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreidler, C. W. (1989). The Pronunciation of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kreidler, C. W. (1997). Describing Spoken English: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. & McDavid, R. I. (1961). The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States: Based Upon the Collections of the Linguistic Atlas of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S. & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (2001). A Course in Phonetics (4th edn.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
Laferriere, M. (1979). Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language 55 (3), 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). Acoustical Characteristics of Selected English Consonants. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University & The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. (1989). Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 2114–2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, G. E. & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, L. D. & Kent, R. D. (2003). Clinical Phonetics (3rd edn.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar