Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:58:02.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Studies of Zinc Oxide Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christian Carl Fesenmaier
Affiliation:
chrisfez@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Electrical Engineering, 128 Running Farm Ln, Apt 110, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States, 6504687197
Xiaonan S. Li
Affiliation:
xiaonan_li@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Bobby To
Affiliation:
bobby_to@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Dean H. Levi
Affiliation:
dean_levi@nrel.gov, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Get access

Abstract

Zinc oxide is increasingly being studied as an eventual replacement for indium tin oxide as a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) for thin film solar cells. In order to better understand the growth process of ZnO, as well as provide for accurate control on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's TCO deposition system, undoped RF-magnetron sputtered ZnO films on silicon were analyzed in situ using real-time spectroscopic ellipsometry (RTSE). A large wavelength range (245-994 nm) was measured in order to derive information about optical properties both below and above the bandgap. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were also taken to confirm ellipsometry surface roughness results and provide additional insight into the surface morphology.

In light of observed poor fit of typical two-layer optical models to in situ ellipsometry data, we propose a model film structure consisting of two layers: a bulk ZnO layer of graded density that increases in thickness as the growth proceeds and a growth zone at the top of the film of approximately constant thickness with a slightly larger bandgap, lower density, and decreased excitonic absorption. Unfortunately, this model is insufficient to explain the evolution of the film during the early growth period, corresponding to film thicknesses less than 100 nm. Nevertheless, the presence of a growth zone for films above a certain thickness should provide some insight into the growth process of RF-magnetron sputtered ZnO.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Faÿ, S., Feitknecht, L. Schlüchter, R., Kroll, U. Vallat-Sauvain, E. and Shah, A. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 18-19 (90), 29602967 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Fortunato, E. Gonçalves, A., Assunção, V., Marques, A. Águas, H., Pereira, L. Ferreira, I. and Martins, R. Thin Solid Films 1-2 (442), 121126 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Hao, X. Ma, J. Zhang, D. Yang, T. Ma, H. Yang, Y. Cheng, C. and Huang, J. Applied Surface Science 1-2 (183), 137142 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Qu, Y. Gessert, T. A. Ramanathan, K. Dhere, R. G. Noufi, R. and Coutts, T. J. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films (11), 996 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Yu, X. Ma, J. Ji, F. Wang, Y. Cheng, C. and Ma, H. Applied Surface Science 1-4 (245), 310315 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Zhu, B. L. Sun, X. H. Guo, S. S. Zhao, X. Z. Wu, J. Wu, R. and Liu, J. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 10A (45), 78607865 (2006).Google Scholar
7. Volintiru, I. Creatore, M. and Sanden, M. C. M. van de, Journal of Applied Physics (103), 033704 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Zayer, N. K. Greef, R. Rogers, K. Grellier, A. J. C. and Pannell, C. N. Thin Solid Films 1-2 (352), 179184 (1999).Google Scholar
9. EASE, Version 2.36, J.A. Woolam Co., Inc. Google Scholar
10. Dumont, E. Dugnoille, B. and Bienfait, S. Thin Solid Films 1-2 (353), 9399 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Fujiwara, H. Koh, J. Rovira, P. I. and Collins, R. W. Physical Review B 16 (61), 1083210844 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Petrik, P. Biró, L. P., Fried, M. Lohner, T. Berger, R. Schneider, C. Gyulai, J. and Ryssel, H. Thin Solid Films 1-2 (315), 186191 (1998).Google Scholar
13. Fang, S. J. Chen, W. Yamanaka, T. and Helms, C. R. Applied Physics Letters (68), 2837 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Koh, J. Lu, Y. Wronski, C. R. Kuang, Y. Collins, R. W. Tsong, T. T. and Strausser, Y. E. Applied Physics Letters (69), 1297 (1996).Google Scholar