Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:07:37.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A PICTURE OF STOCK–FLOW UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2009

Melvyn G. Coles
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Paul Jones
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Eric Smith*
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and University of Essex
*
Address correspondence to: Eric Smith, Department of Economics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK; e-mail: esmith@essex.ac.uk.

Abstract

Stock–flow job matching implies that there are two types of job seekers—those on the short side of their occupations who can easily find work, and those on the long side who expect extended unemployment spells. Using matching data and information on completed and uncompleted unemployment spells for England and Wales, this paper uses the stock–flow matching hypothesis to identify the fraction (incidence) of laid off workers who find themselves on the long side of the market and, conditional on being on the long side, their expected unemployment duration. The average incidence is around one-half and increases significantly in recessions. The expected duration is also strongly countercyclical—peaking at 15 months in the 1990–1992 recession and falling to a more modest 9 months by January 1999. Cross-section estimates also identify a North–South divide and a large city effect—the unemployed in large cities and in the North experience longer spells.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron and Shimer, Robert (1999) Efficient unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy 107, 893929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, James, Gautier, Pieter, and Vroman, Susan (2003) Matching with multiple applications. Economics Letters 78, 6770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Martin, Bradley, Steve, and Upward, Richard (2001) Estimating the probability of a match using microeconomic data for the youth labor market. Labour Economics 8, 335357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgardner, James R. (1988) Physician services and the division of labor across local markets. Journal of Political Economy 96, 948982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdett, Kenneth and Coles, Melvyn G. (1998) Separation cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22, 10691091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdett, Kenneth, Shi, Shouyong, and Wright, Randall (2001) Pricing with frictions. Journal of Political Economy 109, 10601085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Melvyn G. (1999) Turnover externalities with marketplace trading. International Economics Review 40, 851868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Melvyn G. and Muthoo, Abhinay (1998) Strategic bargaining and competitive bidding in a dynamic market equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 65, 235260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Melvyn G. and Petrongolo, Barbara (2008) A test between unemployment theories using matching data. International Economic Review 49, 11131149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, Melvyn G. and Smith, Eric (1998) Marketplaces and matching. International Economic Review 39, 239255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, Paul and Petrongolo, Barbara (2005) Stock–flow matching and the performance of the labour market. European Economic Review 49, 19872011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James and Singer, Burton (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52, 271320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sunwoong (1989) Labor specialization and the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy 79, 692705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Mien-yun and Smith, Eric (2009) Marketplace matching in England and Wales: Evidence from individual unemployment spells. Labour Economics 16, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagos, Ricardo (2000) An alternative approach to search frictions. Journal of Political Economy 108, 851873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Tony and Nickell, Stephen J. (1980) The analysis of re-employment probabilities for the unemployed. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 143 (2), 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, Richard, Nickell, Stephen J., and Jackman, Richard (1991) Unemployment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machin, Stephen and Manning, Alan (1999) The causes and consequences of long-term unemployment in Europe. In Ashenfelter, Orley and Card, David (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, pp. 30853139. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Meyer, Bruce (1990) Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58, 757782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, James (1991) Equilibrium wage dispersion and interindustry wage differentials. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 163179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, Stephen J. (1997) Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrongolo, Barbara and Pissarides, Christopher (2001) Looking into the black box: A survey of the matching function. Journal of Economic Literature 39, 390431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portugal, Pedro and Addison, John T. (2000) Short- and long-term unemployment. Economic Letters 66, 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Carl and Stiglitz, Joseph (1984) Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline devise. American Economic Review 74, 433444.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven and Weiss, Laurence (1979) The optimal payment of unemployment insurance benefits over time. Journal of Political Economy 87 (6), 13471362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimer, Robert (2007) Mismatch. American Economic Review 97, 10741101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimer, Robert and Smith, Lones (2001) Non-stationary Search. Mimeo, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Taylor, Curtis (1995) The long side of the market and the short end of the stick: Bargaining power and price formation in buyers', sellers', and balanced markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 837855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar