Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:52:01.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A multi-parameter criterion for layer formation in a stratified shear flow using sorted buoyancy coordinates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2017

J. R. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Q. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: J.R.Taylor@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Here, we examine the conditions for layer formation in a stratified shear flow. We reformulate the conditions for amplification of small perturbations to a uniform stratification first proposed by Phillips (Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, vol. 19, 1972, pp. 79–81, Elsevier) and Posmentier (J. Phys. Oceanogr., vol. 7 (2), 1977, pp. 298–300) using the sorted buoyancy coordinates introduced by Nakamura (J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 53 (11), 1996, pp. 1524–1537) and Winters & D’Asaro (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 317, 1996, pp. 179–193). We consider the possible dependence of the effective diffusivity on three non-dimensional parameters, the gradient Richardson number, the buoyancy Reynolds number and the Prandtl number, and obtain a simple expression for conditions favourable for layer formation. The new framework is applied to direct numerical simulations of stratified shear flow. We then apply a recent multi-parameter parameterization developed by Salehipour et al. (Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 43 (7), 2016, pp. 3370–3379), which suggests that layer formation is favoured for large Prandtl numbers and moderate to large values of the gradient Richardson and buoyancy Reynolds numbers.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartello, P. & Tobias, S. M. 2013 Sensitivity of stratified turbulence to the buoyancy Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 725, 122.Google Scholar
Bouffard, D. & Boegman, L. 2013 A diapycnal diffusivity model for stratified environmental flows. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 61, 1434.Google Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Billant, P., Lindborg, E. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2007 Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 343368.Google Scholar
Deusebio, E., Caulfield, C. P. & Taylor, J. R. 2015 The intermittency boundary in stratified plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 781, 298329.Google Scholar
Dillon, T. M. & Caldwell, D. R. 1980 The Batchelor spectrum and dissipation in the upper ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 85 (C4), 19101916.Google Scholar
Gargett, A. E., Osborn, T. R. & Nasmyth, P. W. 1984 Local isotropy and the decay of turbulence in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 231280.Google Scholar
Garrett, C. & Munk, W. 1971 Internal wave spectra in the presence of fine-structure. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1 (3), 196202.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holford, J. M. & Linden, P. F. 1999 Turbulent mixing in a stratified fluid. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 30 (2), 173198.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1979 Mixing in stratified fluids. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 13 (1), 323.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1980 Mixing across a density interface produced by grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 100 (04), 691703.Google Scholar
Lozovatsky, I. D. & Fernando, H. J. S. 2013 Mixing efficiency in natural flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 371 (1982), 20120213.Google Scholar
Mater, B. D. & Venayagamoorthy, S. K. 2014a The quest for an unambiguous parameterization of mixing efficiency in stably stratified geophysical flows. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 (13), 46464653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mater, B. D. & Venayagamoorthy, S. K. 2014b A unifying framework for parameterizing stably stratified shear-flow turbulence. Phys. Fluids 26 (3), 036601.Google Scholar
Nakamura, N. 1996 Two-dimensional mixing, edge formation, and permeability diagnosed in an area coordinate. J. Atmos. Sci. 53 (11), 15241537.Google Scholar
Park, Y.-G., Whitehead, J. A. & Gnanadeskian, A. 1994 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids: layer formation and energetics. J. Fluid Mech. 279, 279311.Google Scholar
Pelegrí, J. L. & Sangrà, P. 1998 A mechanism for layer formation in stratified geophysical flows. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 103 (C13), 3067930693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, W. R. & Caulfield, C. P. 2003 Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35 (1), 135167.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1972 Turbulence in a strongly stratified fluid – is it unstable? In Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, vol. 19, pp. 7981. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Portwood, G., de Bruyn Kops, S., Taylor, J. R., Salehipour, H. & Caulfield, C. P. 2016 Robust identification of dynamically distinct regions in stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 807, R2.Google Scholar
Posmentier, E. S. 1977 The generation of salinity finestructure by vertical diffusion. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7 (2), 298300.Google Scholar
Radko, T. 2016 Thermohaline layering in dynamically and diffusively stable shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 805, 147170.Google Scholar
Ruddick, B. R., McDougall, T. J. & Turner, J. S. 1989 The formation of layers in a uniformly stirred density gradient. Deep Sea Res. A 36 (4), 597609.Google Scholar
Salehipour, H. & Peltier, W. R. 2015 Diapycnal diffusivity, turbulent Prandtl number and mixing efficiency in Boussinesq stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 775, 464500.Google Scholar
Salehipour, H., Peltier, W. R., Whalen, C. B. & MacKinnon, J. A. 2016 A new characterization of the turbulent diapycnal diffusivities of mass and momentum in the ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 (7), 33703379.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R. W. 1994 Double diffusion in oceanography. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26 (1), 255285.Google Scholar
Shih, L. H., Koseff, J. R., Ivey, G. N. & Ferziger, J. H. 2005 Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 193214.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Moum, J. N. 2000 Length scales of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 12 (6), 13271342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. 2008 Numerical Simulations of the Stratified Oceanic Bottom Boundary Layer. University of California.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R., Deusebio, E., Caulfield, C. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2016 A new method for isolating turbulent states in transitional stratified plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, R1.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2016 Layers and internal waves in uniformly stratified fluids stirred by vertical grids. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 380413.Google Scholar
Tseng, Y. & Ferziger, J. H. 2001 Mixing and available potential energy in stratified flows. Phys. Fluids 13, 12811293.Google Scholar
Winters, K. B. & D’Asaro, E. A. 1996 Diascalar flux and the rate of fluid mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 179193.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q., Taylor, J. R., Caulfield, C. P. & Linden, P. F. 2017 Diapycnal mixing in layered stratified plane Couette flow quantified in a tracer-based coordinate. J. Fluid Mech., (in press).Google Scholar