Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:21:55.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Diagram of a Lattice Model for Ternary Mixtures of Water, Oil, and Surfactants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Mohamed Laradji
Affiliation:
Centre for the Physics of Materials and Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 Rue University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8
Hong Guo
Affiliation:
Centre for the Physics of Materials and Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 Rue University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8
Martin Grant
Affiliation:
Centre for the Physics of Materials and Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 Rue University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8
Martin J. Zuchkermann
Affiliation:
Centre for the Physics of Materials and Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 Rue University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T8
Get access

Abstract

Large scale Monte-Carlo simulations have been performed on a lattice model for a three component system of water, oil, and surfactants to obtain the phase equilibria and scattering behavior for a wide range of temperatures and chemical potentials. We observed that this model has a rich phase behavior, namely a water-oil phase coexistence, a microemulsion phase, a lamellar phase, and a square phase. This phase diagram is consistent with experiments, and is in qualitative agreement with a model of Gompper and Schick [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1647 (1989)].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Physics of Amphiphilie Layers, edited by Meunier, J., Langevin, D., and Boccara, N. (Springer-Verlag, 1987), Part VI, and references therein.Google Scholar
2 Laradji, M., Guo, H., Grant, M., and Zuckermann, M.J., J. Phys. A 24, L629 (1991), J.H. Yao and M. Laradji, unpublished.Google Scholar
3 Kotlarchyk, M., Chen, S.-H., Huang, J.S., and Kim, M.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 941 (1984), L. Auvray, J.P. Cotton, R. Ober, and C. Taupin, J. Phys. (Paris), 45, 913 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 aWheeler, J. C. and Widom, B., J. Am. chem. Soc. 90, 3064 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 bSafran, S.A. and Turkevick, L. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1930 (1983).Google Scholar
4 cGompper, G. and Schick, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1647 (1989).Google Scholar
4 dChen, K., Jayaprakach, C., Pandit, R., and Wenzel, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2736 (1990).Google Scholar
4 eCiah, A., Hoye, J.S., and Stell, G., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1215 (1989).Google Scholar
4 fMatsen, M.W. and Sullivan, D.E., Phys. Rev. A. 41, 2021 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Laradji, M., Guo, H., Grant, M. and Zuckermann, M.J., to appear in Phys. Rev. A, 44, number 12 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Ferrenberg, A.M. and Swendsen, R.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1195 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Lee, J. and Kosterlitz, J.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 137 (1990).Google Scholar
8 Blume, M., Phys. Rev. 141, 517 (1966), and H.W. Capel, Physica 32, 966 (1966).Google Scholar