Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T15:37:56.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in a conservative region: the Kentish Sermons genitive system1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2011

SARA MYERS
SARA MYERS*
Affiliation:
Linguistics and English Language, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UKS.M.Myers@sms.ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The early Middle English Kentish Sermons shows a genitive system which is far advanced towards that of Modern English, an unexpected feature for a text from the conservative region of Kent. In this article I describe this genitive system, and examine how it developed. As the text is a translation from French, the question of French influence is central. Following brief descriptions of the sociolinguistic situation in England at the time (section 2) and of the Old English and Old French genitive systems (section 3), in section 4 I describe in detail the genitive system of the Kentish Sermons: genitive forms and functions, as well as the factors which affected their use. In section 5 I compare Kentish Sermon genitive phrases to corresponding phrases in the French original. There is evidence that a particular genitive function was strongly influenced by French models, but the system as a whole has its origins in the transition from Old to Middle English.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 417 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1 (2), 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2003. Deflexion and the development of the genitive in English. English Language and Linguistics 7 (1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2009. On the disappearance of genitive types in Middle English: Objective genitives with nouns of love and dread and the nature of syntactic change. In Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F. & Vocaj, E. (eds.), Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–60.Google Scholar
Barlow, Frank. 1988. The feudal kingdom of England, 1042 – 1216. 4th edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas. 2002. A history of the English language. 5th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. W. & Smithers, G. V.. 1966. Early Middle English verse and prose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, T. Northcote. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1963. An outline of Middle English grammar. Trans. Johnston, G. K. W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnley, David. 1992. Lexis and semantics. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: 1066–1476, vol. 2, 409–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dictionary of Middle English. <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med> University of Michigan. 18 December 2001 (accessed 23 August 2010).+University+of+Michigan.+18+December+2001+(accessed+23+August+2010).>Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: 1066–1476, vol. 2, 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradon, Pamela (ed.). 1979. Dan Michel's Ayenbite of Inwyt, vol. II: Introduction, notes and glossary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1920. Selections from early Middle English: 1130-1250. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Healey, Antonette DiPaolo & Venezky, Richard L.. 1980. A microfiche concordance to Old English. Dictionary of Old English Project, Center for Medieval Studies: University of Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kibler, William. 1984. An introduction to Old French. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Koike, Takeshi. 2006. The history of the genitive case from the Old English period onwards. English Language and Linguistics 10 (1), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, Margaret. 1993. Catalogue of sources for a linguistic atlas of Early Medieval English. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.. 2007. A guide to Old English. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard. 1872. An Old English miscellany. London: Trubner.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Myers, Sara M. 2008. The evolution of the genitive noun phrase in early Middle English. Unpublished MPhil thesis. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd edn. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1966. From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman: Phonology and morphology. 2nd edn. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robson, C. A. 1952. Maurice of Sully and the Medieval Vernacular Homily. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, Mary S. 1935. A history of foreign words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar