Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:19:37.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spent Fuel as a Waste Form - Data Needs to Allow Long Term Performance Assessment Under Repository Disposal Conditions.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

V. M. Oversby*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

Performance assessment calculations are required for high level waste repositories for a period of 10,000 years under NRC and EPA regulations. In addition, the Siting Guidelines (IOCFR960) require a comparison of sites following site characterization and prior to final site selection to be made over a 100,000 year period. In order to perform the required calculations, a detailed knowledge of the physical and chemical processes that affect waste form performance will be needed for each site. While bounding calculations might be sufficient to show compliance with the requirements of IOCFR60 and 40CFRI91, the site comparison for 100,000 years will need to be based on expected performance under site specific conditions. The only case where detailed knowledge of waste form characteristics in the repository would not be needed would be where radionuclide travel times to the accessible environment can be shown to exceed 100,000 years. This paper will review the factors that affect the release of radionuclides from spemt fuel under repository conditions, summarize our present state of knowledge, and suggest areas where more work is needed in order to support the performance assessment calculations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 191, Federal Register vol. 50, No. 182 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR Part 60, U. S. Government Printing Office (1983).Google Scholar
3. Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR Part 960, Federal Register vol. 49, No. 236 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Oversby, V. M., UCRL-94222, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Wilson, C. N., HEDL-TME 85-22, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA (1986).Google Scholar
6. Oversby, V. M. and Shaw, H. F., UCID-20926, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Konynenburg, R. A. Van, Smith, C. F., Culham, H. W., and Otto, C. H., UCRL-90855, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Konynenburg, R. A. Van, Smith, C. F., Culham, H. W., and Smith, H. D., UCRL-94708, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Barner, J. O., PNL-5109, Rev. 1, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1985).Google Scholar
10. Forsyth, R. S., personal communication (1986).Google Scholar
11. Forsyth, R. S., L. 0. Werme, and 3. Bruno, SKB Technical Report 85-16, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1985).Google Scholar
12. Johnson, L. H., Burns, K. I., Joling, H. H., and Moore, C. J., Nuclear Technology 63, 470 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shoesmith, D. W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M. G., Wallace, G. J., and Stanchell, F. W., Applications of Surface Science 20, 39 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wilson, C. N. and Shaw, H. F., UCRL-94633, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Wilson, C. N., HEDL-TME 84-30, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA (1985).Google Scholar
16. Einziger, R. E. and Woodley, R. E., Proceedings of the Waste Management 85 Conference, ed. Post, R. G., vol. 1, p. 505 (1985).Google Scholar
17. Holdren, G. R. jr., and Berner, R. A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43, 1161 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar