Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:41:00.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicating Nanoscale Science and Engineering to the General Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Carl Batt
Carl Batt*
Affiliation:
cab10@cornell.edu, Cornell University, Food Science, 312 Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States, 607-255-7900, 607-255-8741
Get access

Abstract

Communicating the underlying concepts in nanotechnology to the general public is challenging but essential as its impact on society increases over time. We have created a webzine called Nanooze and a traveling museum exhibition called Too Small to See to help communicate nanoscale science and engineering concepts. Nanooze was launched in 2006 and covers the basic concepts of nanotechnology along with the latest in scientific discoveries and interviews with scientists. Its mission is to excite, educate, and challenge kids age 6 to 10 years old and their teachers. Nanooze covers both the underlying science of nanotechnology and its applications. It has attracted a broad audience and has been one of the core resources to a number of national/international competitions, schools and after-school groups. Surveys of readers reveal that over 50% thought that Nanooze was cool with approximately 21% stating that they visit Nanooze once a month. During the 2006 FIRST Lego League competition, which Nanooze supported, 385,000 hits were recorded in one month indicating its broad reach. Too Small to See is a traveling museum exhibition that immerses visitors in a hands-on interactive experience in nanotechnology. This five thousand square foot exhibition is currently on a national tour after debuting at Epcot, Walt Disney World Resort. Too Small to See takes the visitor from the macroscale world to the nanoscale world through a series of interactive and video experiences using everyday objects as the focal point. Once there, the visitor can play with atoms and take on challenges that illustrate the difficulties of nanotechnology. Summative evaluation has revealed that 60% of the visitors were interested in knowing more about nanotechnology as a result of the exhibits. Over 80% of the visitors surveyed altered their viewpoint of the smallest thing that they could think of from a macroscopic object to a nanoscale object after using the exhibits.

Keywords

educationnanoscalenanostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1105: Symposium OO – The Role of Lifelong Education in Nanoscience and Engineering , 2008 , 1105-OO02-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Batt, C., Waldron, A.M., and Broadwater, N., Numbers, scale and symbols: The public understanding of nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Research, 2007.Google Scholar
2 Currall, S.C., et al., What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? Nature Nanotech., 2006. 1: p. 153–155.Google Scholar
3 Taber, K.S., When the analogy breaks down: Modelling the atom on the solar system. Phys. Educ., 2001. 36(3): p. 222–226.Google Scholar
4 Waldron, A.M., Spencer, D., and Batt, C., The current state of pubic understanding of nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Research, 2006. 8: p. 569–575.Google Scholar
5 Pasachoff, J.M., What should students learn? Stellar magnitudes. Astro. Educ. Rev., 2003. 2(2): p. 162–165.Google Scholar
6 Booth, J.L. and Siegler, R.S., Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Dev. Psych., 2006. 41(6): p. 189–201.Google Scholar
7 Cohen, D.J., Ferrell, J.M., and Johnson, N., What very small numbers mean. J. Exp. Psych., 2002. 131(3): p. 424–442.Google Scholar
8 DeLoache, J.S., Kolstad, V., and Anderson, K.N., Physical similarity and young children's understanding of scale models. Child. Dev., 1991. 62: p. 111–126.Google Scholar
9 DeLoache, J.S., Uttal, D.H., and Rosengren, K.S., Scale errors offer evidence for a perception-action dissociation early in life. Science, 2004. 304: p. 1027–1029.Google Scholar
10 Laszlo, P., Playing with molecular models. Int. J. Phil. Chem., 2000. 6(1): p. 85–97.Google Scholar
11 Beer, V., Great expectations: Do museums know what visitors are doing? Curator, 1987. 30(3): p. 206–215.Google Scholar
12 Tran, L.U., Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Sci. Educ, 2007. 91: p. 278–297.Google Scholar
13 Kozma, R. and Russell, J., Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 1997. 34(9): p. 949–968.Google Scholar