Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:03:26.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meiotic inhibition of bovine oocytes in medium supplemented with a serum replacer and hormones: effects on meiosis progression and developmental capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2010

Letícia Siqueira Sá Barretto
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Animal Reproduction, UNESP, 14884–900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Viviane Sgobbi Dias Caiado Castro
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Animal Reproduction, UNESP, 14884–900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Animal Reproduction, UNESP, 14884–900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Gisele Zoccal Mingoti*
Affiliation:
Rua Clóvis Pestana, 793, Department of Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNESP, Araçatuba, 16050–680, São Paulo, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to: Gisele Zoccal Mingoti. Rua Clóvis Pestana, 793, Department of Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNESP, Araçatuba, 16050–680, São Paulo, Brazil Tel: +55 18 36361357. Fax: +55 18 36361352. e-mail: gmingoti@fmva.unesp.br

Summary

Aiming to improve the developmental competence of bovine oocytes during meiotic block, this study evaluated the effects of a serum replacer (Knockout SR®) and hormones (gonadotropins and estradiol) supplementation of prematuration medium (TCM119 with 0.5 mM IBMX [IBMX group] or 25 μM roscovitine [ROSC group]) on the kinetics of oocyte nuclear maturation and embryo development. Most IBMX and ROSC oocytes prematured for 8 h culture remained in the GV stage (70.3% and 73.1%, respectively; p > 0.05) similar to Control 8 h (63.5%) and to control immature oocytes (Control 0 h, 92.5%). After prematuration for 16 h, no oocytes remained in the GV stage at similar rates to those recently aspirated (p < 0.05); GV rates in ROSC (32.4%) were higher (p < 0.05) than in the Control 16 h group (8.6%), but similar (p > 0.05) to IBMX (9.7%). After in vitro maturation (IMV) for 24 h, metaphase II (MII) rates for oocytes prematured during 8 h were similar (p > 0.05) between control and treatments (65.0–71.7%). Similarly, MII rates oocytes prematured during 16 h were similar (p > 0.05) between all groups (45.9–60.4%). Cleavage rates (67.8–78.2%), embryonic development in day-7 (25.0–35.6%) and hatching rates in day-8 (2.5–11.3%) oocytes blocked during 8 h were similar for all groups (p > 0.05). Results indicate that addition of Knockout SR® and hormones to meiotic block culture with IBMX and roscovitine negatively affected meiotic arrest, but did not impair oocyte nuclear maturation and acquisition of developmental competence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adona, P.R., Pires, P.R., Quetglas, M.D., Schwarz, K.R. & Leal, C.L. (2008). Prematuration of bovine oocytes with butyrolactone I: effects on meiosis progression, cytoskeleton, organelle distribution and embryo development. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 108, 4965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avery, B., Hay-Schmidt, A., Hyttel, P. & Greve, T. (1998). Embryo development, oocyte morphology and kinetics of meiotic maturation in bovine oocytes exposed to 6-dimethylaminopurine prior to in vitro maturation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50, 334–44.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barretto, L.S., Caiado Castro, V.S., Garcia, J.M. & Mingoti, G.Z. (2007). Role of roscovitine and IBMX on kinetics of nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes in vitro. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 99, 202–07.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesnel, F., Wigglesworth, K. & Eppig, J.J. (1994). Acquisition of meiotic competence by denuded mouse oocytes: participation of somatic-cell product(s) and cAMP. Dev. Biol. 161, 285–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppig, J.J., O'Brien, M. & Wiggleworth, K. (1996). Mammalian oocyte growth and development in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 44, 260–78.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsborough, M.D., Tilkins, M.L., Price, P.J., Lobo-Alfonso, J., Morrison, J.R., Stevens, M.E., Meneses, J., Pedersen, R., Koller, B. & Latour, A. (1998). Serum-free culture of murine embryonic stem (ES) cells. Focus 20, 811.Google Scholar
Gosden, R., Krapez, J. & Briggs, D. (1997). Growth and development of the mammalian oocyte. Bioessays 10, 875–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupen, C.G., Fung, M. & Armstrong, D.T. (2006). Effects of milrinone and butyrolactone-I on porcine oocyte meiotic progression and developmental competence. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, K.M. & Brackett, B.G. (1993). Bovine blastocyst development after in vitro maturation in a defined media with epidermal growth factor and low concentrations of gonadotropins. Biol. Reprod. 48, 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyttel, P., Fair, T., Callesen, H. & Greve, T. (1997). Oocyte growth, capacitation and final maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 47, 2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S.M. & Walter, U.W. (1984). Regulation of the cellular and subcellular concentrations and distribution of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase. In Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide and Protein Phosphorylation Research, (ed. Greengard, P.), pp. 63115. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Lonergan, P., Khatir, H., Carolan, C. & Mermillod, P. (1997). Bovine blastocyst production in vitro after inhibition of oocyte meiotic resumption for 24 h. J. Reprod. Fertil. 109, 355–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayes, M.A. & Sirard, M.A. (2001). The influence of cumulus-oocyte complex morphology and meiotic inhibitors on the kinetics of nuclear maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 55, 911–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchal, R., Tomanek, M., Terqui, M. & Mermillod, P. (2001). Effects of cell cycle dependent kinases inhibitor on nuclear amd cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 60, 6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermillod, P., Tomanek, M., Marchal, R. & Meijer, L. (2000). High developmental competence of cattle oocytes maintained at the germinal vesicle stage for 24 hours in culture by specific inhibition of MPF kinase activity. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 55, 8995.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K., Rodriguez-Sallaberry, C.J., Kramer, J.M., Johnson, S., Wroclawska, E., Goicoa, S. & Niasari-Naslaji, A. (2007). In vitro production of bovine embryos in medium supplemented with a serum replacer: effects on blastocyst development, cryotolerance and survival to term. Theriogenology 68, 1316–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, J.J., Kim, C.I. & Bae, I.H. (1992). Current concepts of cell-cycle regulation and its relationship to oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryo development. Theriogenology 38, 277–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponderato, N., Lagutina, I., Crotti, G., Turini, P., Galli, C. & Lazzari, G. (2001). Bovine oocytes treated prior to in vitro maturation with a combination of butyrolactone I and roscovitine at low doses maintain a normal development capacity. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 60, 579–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponderato, N., Crotti, G., Turini, P., Duchi, R., Galli, C. & Lazzari, G. (2002). Embryonic and foetal development of bovine oocytes treated with a combination of butyrolactone I and roscovitine in an enriched medium prior to IVM and IVF. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 62, 513–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizos, D., Ward, F., Duffy, P., Boland, M.P. & Lonergan, P. (2002). Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization on early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 61, 234–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, K.F. & Farin, C.E. (2004). Developmental capacity of bovine cumulus oocytes complexes after transcriptional inhibition of germinal vesicle breakdown. Theriogenology 61, 1499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, R.M. (1991). Meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes. In Elements of Mammalian Fertilization, (ed. Wasserman, P.M.), pp. 77104. Boca Raton: FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Shimada, M., Nishibori, M., Isobe, N., Kawano, N. & Terada, T. (2003). Luteinizing hormone receptor formation in cumulus cells surrounding porcine oocytes and its role during meiotic maturation of porcine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 68, 1142–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirard, M.A., Florman, H.M., Leibfried-Rutledge, M.L., Barnes, F.L., Sims, M.L. & First, N.L. (1989). Timing of nuclear progression and protein synthesis necessary for meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sha, W., Xu, B.Z., Li, M., Liu, D., Feng, H.L. & Sun, Q.Y. (2009). Effect of gonadotropins on oocyte maturation in vitro: an animal model. Fertil. Steril. (In press doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, C., Szöllösi, D. & Gérard, M. (1987). Mammalian oocyte maturation. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 27, 865–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsafriri, A., Chun, S.Y., Zhang, R., Hsueh, A.J. & Conti, M. (1996). Oocyte maturation involves compartmentalization and opposing changes of cAMP levels in follicular somatic and germ cells: Studies using selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Dev. Biol. 178, 393402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigneron, C., Perreau, C., Dupont, J., Uzbekova, S., Prigent, C. & Mermillod, P. (2004). Several signaling pathways are involved in the control of cattle oocyte maturation. Mol Reprod Dev. 69, 466–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X., Kubota, C., Suzuki, H., Taneja, M., Bols, P.E. & Presicce, G.A. (1998). Control of oocyte maturation in cows—biological factors. Theriogenology 49, 471–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed