Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:57:40.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2008

John R. Alford ,
Carolyn L. Funk  and
John R. Hibbing
John R. Alford
Affiliation:
Rice University. E-mail: jra@rice.edu
Carolyn L. Funk
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University. E-mail: clfunk@vcu.edu
John R. Hibbing
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln. E-mail: jhibbing@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past, most political scientists have been oblivious to the growing empirical evidence challenging environmental determinism. Professor Charney, apparently as a result of the fact that genes and the environment interact in a complex fashion, advocates that this passive unawareness be replaced by active denial. Science, however, does not advance by avoiding important relationships merely because they are complicated and, fortunately, science is not heeding Charney's ideologically-based fears. Molecular geneticists, often working in tandem with political scientists, are quickly moving beyond twin studies to identify the specific suites of genes and biological systems that predict variation in core political preferences, whatever labels those preferences might be given in a particular culture at a particular time. We sympathize with the fact that our empirical findings, like those of so many behavioral geneticists, make Charney uncomfortable; still, his critique serves up nothing new—empirically or otherwise. Just as analyses of the roots of sexual preferences cannot presumptively ignore genetics, neither can analyses of the roots of political preferences.

Type
Exchange
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 321 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., and Sanford, R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review 99 (2): 153–68.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2007. Personal, inter-personal, and political temperaments. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (November): 196–212.Google Scholar
Amodio, David M., Jost, John T., Master, Sarah L., and Yee, Cindy M.. 2007. Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience 10: 1246–7.Google Scholar
Block, Jack, and Block, Jeanne H.. 2005. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality 39: 395–422.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T.J. Jr., and McGue, Matt. 2003. Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology 54: 4–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, Gregory. 2003. Human Genetics for the Social Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Carmen, Ira H. 2007. “From Genes to Mind to Politics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12–15.Google Scholar
Charney, Evan. 2008. Genes and ideologies. Perspectives on Politics 6 (2): 299–315.Google Scholar
Cronk, N.J., Slutske, W.S., Madden, P.A., Bucholz, K.K, Reich, W, and Heath, A.C.. 2002. Emotional and behavioral problems among female twins: An evaluation of the equal environments assumption. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 41: 829–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, Marit, Rasmussen, Finn, and Tynelius, Per. 2006. Genetic factors in physical activity and the equal environment assumption: The Swedish young male twins study. Behavior Genetics 36: 238–47.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura, and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2006. “The Genetic Basis of Political Cooperation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Gerring, John 1997. Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly 50: 957–94.Google Scholar
Gosling, Samuel D., and John, Oliver P.. 1999. Personality dimensions in non-human animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8: 69–75.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Graham, Jesse. 2008. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 21, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K. 2007. “The Genetics of Political Attitudes.” PhD Diss., University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Medland, Sarah E., Morley, Kate I., Heath, Anthony C., and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2007a. The genetics of voting: An Australian twin study. Behavior Genetics 37: 435–48.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Alford, John R., Hibbing, John R., Martin, Nicholas G., and Eaves, Lindon J.. 2007b. “Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Twin Family Design to Investigate the Genetic Basis of Political Beliefs.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12–15.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Allan, Videon, Tami, Schmitz, Mark, and Davis, Diane. 2003. Rethinking twins and environments: Possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44: 111–29.Google Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 61: 651–70.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, Kenneth S., Neale, Michael C., Kessler, R.C., Heath, Andrew C., and Eaves, L.J.. 1992. A population based twin study of major depression in women: The impact of varying definitions of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry 49: 257–66.Google Scholar
Kendler, Kenneth S., Neale, Michael C., Kessler, R.C., Heath, Andrew C., and Eaves, L.J.. 1993. A test of the equal environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness. Behavior Genetics 23: 21–27.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laswell, Harold. 1930. Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2005. The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues. Political Psychology 26: 455–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Douglas. 1986. Power seekers are different. American Political Science Review 80 (1): 261–69.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W.R., and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, N.G., Eaves, L.J., Heath, A.C., Jardine, R., Feingold, L.M., and Eysenck, H.J.. 1986. Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (15 June): 4364–68.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1958. Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review 52 (1): 27–45.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. The feeling of rationality: The meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 691–706.Google Scholar
Morris-Yates, A., Andrews, G., Howie, P., and Henderson, S.. 1990. Twins: A test of the equal environments assumption. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 81 (4): 322–6.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T.G., Fulker, K. Deater-Deckard; D, Rutter, M., and Plomin, R.. 1998. Genotype-environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavior problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology 34 (5): 970–81.Google Scholar
Orbell, John, Morikawa, Tomonori, Hartwig, Jason, Hanley, James, and Allen, Nicholas. 2004. Machiavellian intelligence as a basis for the evolution of cooperative dispositions. American Political Science Review 98 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R. 1990. The role of inheritance in behavior. Science, 183–248, April 13.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C., McClearn, G.E., and McGuffin, P.. 2001. Behavioral Genetics, 4th ed.New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Willerman, L., and Loehlin, J.C.. 1976. Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics 6: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, Sandra, and Carter-Saltzman, L.. 1979. Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behavior Genetics 9: 527–42.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Darren. 2005. “Evaluating Politics: A Search for the Neural Substrates of Political Thought.” PhD diss., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., and Bardi, A.. 2001. Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 32: 268–90.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Randy, and Fischer, Corey L.. 2007. “What Is the Relevance of Attachment and Life History to Political Values?” Presented at the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Williamsburg, VA, May 30–June 3.Google Scholar
Westen, D., Blagov, P., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., and Hamann, S.. 2006. Neural basis of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on political judgment during the U.S. presidential election of 2004. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 1947–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xian, H., Scherrer, J.F., Eisen, S.A., True, W.R., Heath, A.C., Goldberg, J., Lyons, M.J., and Tsuang, M.T.. 2000. Self-reported zygosity and the equal environments assumption for psychiatric disorders in the Vietnam era twin registry. Behavior Genetics 30: 303–10.Google Scholar