Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:59:36.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of Clomazone Applied at Various Timings in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven J. Langton
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
John W. Albright
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

Field studies conducted in 1991 to 1993 evaluated the efficacy of clomazone applied at various timings for weed control in soybean. Clomazone applied 45, 30, 15, or 0 days prior to planting (DPP) provided season-long control of velvetleaf and giant foxtail. In 1991 and 1992 clomazone alone 30 and 45 DPP failed to control redroot pigweed. Clomazone alone 45 DPP failed to control common lambsquarters. In 1991 and 1992 clomazone at 0.84 kg/ha plus metribuzin applied 45 DPP failed to control redroot pigweed. The addition of metribuzin plus chlorimuron to the above clomazone treatments resolved these weed control deficiencies. Weed control in 1993 was nearly complete across all clomazone treatments. In 1993 clomazone treatments which included metribuzin or metribuzin plus chlorimuron applied PPI or PRE reduced yield. Herbicide injury is the likely cause of this reduction because most treatments in 1993 provided 99% control of all weed species.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1989. Herbicide Handbook. Champaign, IL: WSSA. 352 p.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., and Oplinger, E. S. 1989. Influence of tillage systems on annua! weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:158165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 441 p.Google Scholar
FMC Corporation. 1993. Command product label. Philadelphia, PA: Agricultural Chemicals Group.Google Scholar
Halstead, S. J., and Harvey, R. G. 1988. Effect of rate and carrier on clomazone movement off-site. Weed Technol. 2:179182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, S. J., Albright, J. W., and Harvey, R. G. 1994. Efficacy and environmental effects of early-preplant clomazone treatments for soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:6.Google Scholar
Salzman, F. P., and Renner, K. A. 1992. Response of soybean to combinations of clomazone, metribuzin, linuron, alachlor and atrazine. Weed Technol. 6:922929.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, D. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1988. Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol. 2:323326.Google Scholar
Werling, V. L., and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36:629635.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678685.Google Scholar