Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- 9 Climate Change and Fisheries Politics
- 10 Policy Options for Marine Fisheries
- 11 Large Marine Protected Areas and Ocean Resilience
- 12 Climate Change and Contested Marine Areas in the Arctic
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
12 - Climate Change and Contested Marine Areas in the Arctic
The Case of Svalbard
from Part III - Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- 9 Climate Change and Fisheries Politics
- 10 Policy Options for Marine Fisheries
- 11 Large Marine Protected Areas and Ocean Resilience
- 12 Climate Change and Contested Marine Areas in the Arctic
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change and Ocean GovernancePolitics and Policy for Threatened Seas, pp. 184 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., and Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–19.Google Scholar
Alvsvåg, J., Agnalt, A. L., and Jørstad, K. E. (2009). Evidence for a permanent establishment of the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in the Barents Sea. Biological Invasions, 11(3), 587–95.Google Scholar
Arlov, T. B. (2003). Svalbards Historie (The History of Svalbard – in Norwegian). Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (1999). International regimes and democratic governance: Political equality and influence in global institutions. International Affairs, 75(3), 499–513.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Webb, J. J., and Morath, D. (2009). Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: A review of the literature. Final Report to Oxfam America, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., and Shanklin, J. D. (1985). Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature, 315(6016), 207–10.Google Scholar
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. (2014). Snow Crab. Available at www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/sustainable-durable/fisheries-peches/snow-crab-eng.htmGoogle Scholar
Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattuso, J.-P., Magnan, A., Billé, R., et al. (2015). Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenarios. Science, 349(6243), aac4722-1–aac4722-10.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V. (2000). Integrating theories of international regimes. Review of International Studies, 26, 3–33.Google Scholar
Haug, T., Bogstad, B., Chierici, M., et al. (2017). Future harvest of living resources in the Arctic Ocean north of the Nordic and Barents Seas: A review of possibilities and constraints. Fisheries Research, 188, 38–57. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoel, A. H. (2005). Er Fiskevernsonen Internasjonalt Farvann? (Is the Fisheries Protection Zone International Waters? – in Norwegian). Nordlys.no. Available at www.nordlys.no/debatt/kronikk/article1849275Google Scholar
Hvingel, C. and Sundet, J. (2014). Snow Crab – A New Substantial Resource in the Barents Sea (In Norwegian: Snøkrabbe – en ny stor ressurs i Barentshavet). Nordlys. Available at www.imr.no/publikasjoner/andre_publikasjoner/kronikker/2014_1/snokrabbe_en_ny_stor_ressurs_i_barentshavet/nb-noGoogle Scholar
ICES. (2016). Report of the Working Group on Widely Distributed Stocks (WGWIDE), August 31–September 6, 2016, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2016/ACOM:16.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001). Technical Summary: Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. A Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg2/pdf/wg2TARtechsum.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Haas, P. M., and Levy, M. A. (1993). The effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In Keohane, R. O., Haas, P. M., and Levy, M. A., eds., Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. In Krasner, S. D., ed., International Regimes. Ithaka and London, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, M. A. (1995). International cooperation to combat acid rain. Green Globe Yearbook, 1995, 59–68.Google Scholar
Lindsey, R. (2016). Antarctic Ozone Hole. Available at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/ozone.phpGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (2006). Elaborating the “new institutionalism.” In Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A., and Rockman, B. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
Markham, J. M. (1984). In a ‘dying’ forest, the German soul withers too. The New York Times. Available at www.nytimes.com/1984/05/25/world/in-a-dying-forest-the-german-soul-withers-too.html?mcubz=3.Google Scholar
Molina, M. J. and Rowland, F. S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature, 249(5460), 810–2.Google Scholar
Morrisette, P. M. (1989). The evolution of policy responses to stratospheric ozone depletion. Natural Resources Journal, 29(3), 793–820.Google Scholar
Murray, G. D. and Ings, D. (2015). Adaptation in a time of stress: A social-ecological perspective on changing fishing strategies in the Canadian snow crab fishery. Marine Policy, 60, 280–6.Google Scholar
Nøttestad, L., Diaz, J., Penã, H., et al. (2016a). Feeding strategy of mackerel in the Norwegian Sea relative to currents, temperature, and prey. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(4), 1127–37. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv239Google Scholar
Nøttestad, L., Utne, K. R., Óskarsson, G. J., et al. (2016b). Quantifying changes in abundance, biomass and spatial distribution of Northeast Atlantic (NEA) mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in the Nordic Seas from 2007 to 2014. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(2), 359–73. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv218.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., eds., Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 35–72.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2006). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sliggers, J., Kakebeeke, W., and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2004). Clearing the Air: 25 Years of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.Google Scholar
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O. S., ed. (2007). Examining the Consequences of Arctic Institutions. International Cooperation and Arctic Governance: Regime Effectiveness and Northern Region Building. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–40.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G. (1995). The Svalbard Treaty: From Terra Nullius to Norwegian Sovereignty. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Velders, G. J. M., Andersen, S. O., Daniel, J. S., Fahey, D. W., and McFarland, M. (2007). The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 4814–19.Google Scholar
Wisner, B. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (1998). Creating Regimes: Arctic Accords and International Governance. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 378–85.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by