Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:11:06.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conducting Polypyrrole-based Field Effect Transistors Fabricated by Spin Coating and Inkjet Printing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Fengliang Xue
Affiliation:
Institute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, U.S.A
Yi Su
Affiliation:
Institute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, U.S.A
Kody Varahramyan
Affiliation:
Institute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Spin coating and inkjet printing are two major deposition techniques for flexible polymer plastic electronics. This paper presents polymer field effect transistors (FET) fabricated by these two techniques using conducting poylmer polypyrole (PPy) as a semiconductor material. These thin film polymer field effect transistors operate in the depletion mode. The field effect mobilities are calculated to be 0.045 cm2 V−1s−1 and 0.036 cm2 V−1s−1, and transconductances are 0.104 νS and 0.096 νS at saturation region of the I-V curves for the spin coated and the inkjet printed transistors, respectively. The measured turn-off threshold voltage is around 20 V for both the spin coated and inkjet printed PPy FET transistors. The device performance of the spin coated transistors is slightly better than that of the inkjet printed transistors. This is mainly due to high surface roughness of the printed polymer film and printed dot boundaries, leading to low charge carrier mobility in the printed polymer FET transistors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Okuzaki, H., Ishihara, M., Ashizawa, S., Synthetic Metals, 137 (2003) 947948.Google Scholar
2. Kuo, Chin-Tsou, Chiou, Wen-Hong, Synthetic Metals, 88 (1997), 2330.Google Scholar
3. Koezuka, H., Tsumura, A., Fuchigami, H., and Kuramoto, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (15), 1993, 17941796.Google Scholar
4. Potje-Kamloth, Karin, Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 32(2), 2002, 121140.Google Scholar
5. Epstein, A.J., Hsu, F.-C, Chiou, N.R. and Prigodin, V.N., Synthetic Metals, 137, 2003, 859861.Google Scholar
6. Kou, Chin-Tsou and Liou, Tzong-Rong, Synthetic Metals 82 (1996), 167173.Google Scholar
7. Brown, A.R., Jarrett, C.P., Leeuw, D.M.de, Matters, M., Synth. Met, 1997; 88:3755.Google Scholar