We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 See 68 AJIL 410 (1974).
2 The authors employ numerous terms to describe the Arab action, and finally maintain at 412 that no existing legal concept is adequate in light of the “coercive process” under consideration.
3 See supra note 1, at 413.
4 See supra note 1, at 417–18.
5 See supra note 1, at 419.
6 See UN GA Res. 2625, Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 25 UN GAOR, Supp. 18, at 122–24, UN Doc. A/8028 (1970).
7 See supra, note 1, at 417.
8 See supra note 1, at 421.
9 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964); Sei Fujii v. The State of California, 217 P.R. 2d 481 (1950).
10 See supra note 1, at 418.
* Correspondence on this matter is now closed. R.R.B.
You have
Access
