Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:51:13.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing the Power Conversion Efficiency of Inverted Organic Photovoltaics with Gold Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Rebecca Isseroff
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
Zhenhua Yang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
Jessica Kim
Affiliation:
Manhasset High School, Manhasset NY 11030, United States
Andrew Chen
Affiliation:
Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, United States
Miriam Rafailovich
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this study, an “inverted” design, phase-separated morphology and gold-functionalized reduced graphene oxide (Au-rGO) were used to address exciton recombination and poor Fermi level alignment. To increase efficiencies, a unique methodology was used to coat Au-rGO on top of the active layer. When 0.05 Au-rGO was blended with the active layer, there were metal-thiolate bonds with P3HT and π-π stacking with PCBM. However, KPFM, measured for the first time for this material, showed that the while 0.05mM Au-rGO reduced the energy gap between P3HT and PBCM, this was offset by recombination. KPFM showed that Au-rGO may be better suited between the active layer and electrode. When 0.5mM Au-rGO was coated on top of the active layer, efficiency increased (p<0.002) nearly 600%, suggesting that Au-rGO is a more effective acceptor than a constituent of the active layer.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Tiedje, T., Yablonovitch, E., Cody, G.D., and Brooks, B.G. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 31.5 (1984): 711–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segui, J. APS Bulletin. March 2008.Google Scholar
Wang, Haiteng, He, D., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Wu, H., and Wang, J.. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 11.11 (2011): 9464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H., Qin, X., Sun, X., Yan, W., Yang, J., and Xie, Y.. Scientific Reports 3.1246 (2013): 17.Google Scholar
Garg, Rajni, Dutta, Naba K., and Choudhury, Namita Roy. Nanomaterials 4 (2014): 267300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, L. J., Kim, F, and , J. H. Journal of the Amer. Chem. Society 131.3 (2009): 1043–049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Chen, Ruan, S., Zhang, X., Xie, G., Shen, L., Kong, X., Dong, W., Liu, C. and Chen, W.. Applied Physics Letters 93.19 (2008): 13.Google Scholar
Thema, F. T., Moloto, M. J., Dikio, E. D., Nyangiwe, N. N., Kotsedi, L., Maaza, M., and Khenfouch, M.. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (2013): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalves, Gil, Marques, P.A.A.P, Granadeiro, C. M., Nogueira, H. I. S., Singh, M. K. and Grácio, J.. Chemistry of Materials 21.20 (2009): 4796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, C., Li, H., Akgun, B., Satijia, S., Zhu, Y., Xu, D., Ortiz, J., Gersappe, D., Rafailovich, M. Macromolecules (2013), 46, 18121819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häkkinen, Hannu. Nature Chemistry 4 (2012): 443–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J, Chen, B., Ji, N., Chen, F., L, Y. and Zhang, Z.. Nanoscale 2.12 (2010): 2733–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., Xue, Y., and Dai, L.. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 3.14 (2012): 1928–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Zunfeng, Liu, Q., Huang, Y., Ma, Y., Yin, S., Zhang, X., Sun, W., Chen, Y. Advanced Materials 20.20 (2008): 3924–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar