Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T08:07:17.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anthropometric characteristics of healthy Italian nonagenarians and centenarians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Giovanni Ravaglia
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Pietro Morini
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Paola Forti
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Fabiola Maioli
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Federica Boschi
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Mauro Bernardi
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Giovanni Gasbarrini
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Pathology and Clinical Methodology, University of Bologna, St Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Available anthropometric reference values for elderly people do not include specific norms for over-90-year-old subjects despite their increasing number. In the present study, weight, height and a number of anthropometric variables related to body muscle and fat mass were collected from fifty-seven nonagenarian and forty-one centenarian healthy, non-institutionalized subjects living in an Italian area. Recumbent anthropometry was used to avoid errors associated with impaired mobility. Nonagenarians and centenarian men were taller and heavier than women of corresponding age and had a greater amount of muscle and trunk fat, whereas women showed a marked peripheral adipose distribution. Anthropometric values of both age-groups were generally lower than published norms for 70–89-year-old American and European elderly people. However, differences were less marked when comparing Italian nonagenarians and centenarians with French and British people aged 85 years and over than when comparing Italian subjects with American octogenarians and younger European elderly people. Taken together these findings suggest a dramatic loss of muscle and fat mass in over-90-year-old subjects with respect to younger elderly people. However, changes between successive generations and geographical influences cannot be excluded. The need for local and age-specific norms in nutritional assessment of over-90-year-old people is emphasized. It is also suggested that current anthropometric indices may not be reliable when evaluating the oldest elderly subjects.

Type
Human and Clinical Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Antonini, F. M. & Mannucci, M. (1991). How can we apply the study of centenarians in gerontology today? Giornale di Gerontologia 39, 525532.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, R. N. (1993). Body composition in elderly persons: a critical review of needs and methods. Progress in Food and Nutrition Science 17, 223260.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. W. (1984). Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for american adults. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 8, 515522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, C. W., Bowen, P. E. & Ritchey, S. J. (1981). Norms for nutritional assessment of american adults by upper arm anthropometry American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 25302539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burr, M. L. & Phillips, K. M. (1984). Anthropometric norms in the elderly. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 165169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chumlea, W. C., Baumgartner, R. N. & Vellas, B. P. (1991). Anthropometry and body composition in the perspective of nutritional status in the elderly. Nutrition 7, 5760.Google ScholarPubMed
Chumlea, W. C., Steinbaugh, M. L., Roche, A. F., Mukherjee, D. & Gopalaswamy, N. (1985 a). Nutritional anthropometric assessment in elderly persons 65 to 90 years of age. Journal of Nutrition in the Elderly 4, 3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chumlea, W. C., Roche, A. F., & Steinbaugh, M. L. (1985 b). Estimating stature from knee height for persons 60 to 90 years of age. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 33, 116121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delarue, J., Constans, T., Malvy, D., Pradignac, A., Couet, C. & Lamisse, F. (1994). Anthropometric values in an elderly French population. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 295302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness. Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 7779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falciglia, G., O'Connor, J. & Gedling, E. (1988). Upper arm anthropometric norms in elderly white subjects. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 88, 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisancho, A. R. (1981). New norms of upper limb fat and muscle area for assessment of nutritional status. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 25402545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisancho, A. R. (1984). New standards of weight and body composition by frame size and height for assessment of nutritional status of adults and the elderly. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 40, 808819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Going, S. B. & Lohman, T. G. (1994). Aging and Body Composition. In Handbook of Nutrition in the Aged, 2nd ed., pp. 5771 [Watson, R. R., editor]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Kuczmarski, R. J. (1989). Need for body composition information in elderly subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 50, 11501157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligthart, G. J., Corberand, J. X., Fournier, C., Galanaud, P., Hijmans, W., Kennes, B., Muller-Hermelink, H. K. & Steinmann, G. G. (1984). Admission criteria for immunogerontological studies in man: the SENIEUR protocol. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 28, 4755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F. & Martorell, R. (1988). Anthromopometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.Google Scholar
Mason, J. B. & Rosemberg, I. H. (1994). Protein-energy malnutrition. In Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 13th ed., pp. 440446 [Isselbacher, K. J., Martin, J. B., Braunwald, E., Fauci, A. S., Wilson, J. D. and Kasper, D., editors]. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Najjar, M. F., & Rowland, M. (1987). Anthropometric Reference Data and Prevalence of Overweight. Vital and Health Statistics Series 11, DHEW Publication (PHS) 87–1688. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Studies.Google Scholar
Seidell, J. C., Oosterlee, A., Thijssen, M. A. O., Burema, J., Deuremberg, P., Hautvast, J. G. A. J. & Ruijs, H. J. (1987). Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computer tomography. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuran, M. & Nelson, R. A. (1986). Updated nutritional assessment and support of the elderly. Geriatrics 7, 4870.Google Scholar
Steen, B. (1988). Body composition and aging. Nutrition Reviews 46, 4551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellas, B., Chumlea, W. C., Beziat, F., Ghisolfi-Marque, A., Guo, S., Conceicao, J., Sédeuilh, M., Dufetelle, R. & Albarè de, J. L. (1992). Etude des normes anthropométriques dans une population française de 492 personnes agées en bonne santé et vivant à domicile. (Anthropometric measures in elderly persons living in Europe). L'Année Gerontologique 7, 203217.Google Scholar