Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:16:49.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Catastrophic Field Failures Due to Conductive Anodic Filament (CAF) Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

W. J. Ready
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245 http://reliability.marc.gatech.edu/
B.A. Smith
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245 http://reliability.marc.gatech.edu/
L.J. Turbini
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245 http://reliability.marc.gatech.edu/
S.R. Stock
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245 http://reliability.marc.gatech.edu/
Get access

Abstract

Under certain environmental conditions, printed wiring boards (PWB) respond to applied voltages by developing subsurface deposits of copper salts extending from anode to cathode along separated fiber / epoxy interfaces. The formation of these deposits, termed conductive anodic filaments (CAF) require high humidity (80%RH) and high voltage gradient (5V/mil). The humidity exposure during the storage environment may cause the failure in the use environment. CAF formation is enhanced by the use of certain hot air solder leveling (HASL) fluids and / or water soluble flux constituents.

In this work, two catastrophic field failures were analyzed. Both failures were related to boards produced in a manufacturing process, which included HASL. One CAF failure occurred between a component through-hole and power plane held at a potential difference of 40V with a 0.005″ nominal spacing. The other occurred on an inner layer of a multi-layer board (MLB) between a via and ground plane held at a potential difference of 320V with 0.015” nominal spacing. The nature of the CAF was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Ion chromatography (IC) was used to identify residue extracted from a failed board. The failure phenomena known as CAF poses serious longterm reliability concerns in electronic products exposed to adverse and hostile environments, especially those with closely spaced conductors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Boddy, P.J., Delaney, R.H., Lahti, J.N., and Landry, E.F., “Accelerated Life Testing of Flexible Printed Circuits,” 14th International Reliability Physics Symposium, 1976, pp. 108116.Google Scholar
[2] Lando, D.J., Mitchell, J.P., Welsher, T.L., “Conductive Anodic Filaments in Reinforced Polymeric Dielectrics: Formation and Prevention,” 17th International Reliability Physics Symposium, 1979, pp. 5163.Google Scholar
[3] Lahti, J.N., Delaney, R.H., Hines, J.N., “The Characteristic Wearout Process in Epoxy-Glass Printed Circuit for High Density Electronic Packaging,” 17th International Reliability Physics Symposium, 1979, pp. 3943.Google Scholar
[4] Welsher, T.J., Mitchell, J.P., Lando, D.J., “Conductive Anodic Filaments (CAF): An Electrochemical Failure Mechanism of reinforced Polymeric Dielectrics,” Annual Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 1980, pp. 234239.Google Scholar
[5] Welsher, T.J., Mitchell, J.P., Lando, D.J., “CAF in Composite Printed-Circuit Substrates: Characterization, Modeling and a Resistant Material,” 18th International Reliability Physics Symposium, 1980, pp. 235237.Google Scholar
[6] Ready, W.J., Stock, S.R., Freeman, G.B., Turbini, L.J., “Microstructure of Conductive Anodic Filaments Formed During Accelerated Testing of Printed Wiring Boards,” Circuit World, July 1995, pp. 510.Google Scholar
[7] Turbini, L.J., Schodorf, J., Jachim, J., et al., “Characterising the Corrosion Properties of Flux Residues Part 2: Test Method Modification,” Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, October 1992, pp. 5054.Google Scholar
[8] Munson, T.L., Contamination Studies Laboratory, unpublished data (1995).Google Scholar
[9] Turbini, L.J. & Jachim, J.A., “Interaction of Water Soluble Fluxes with FR-4 Substrate,” The European Surface Mount Conference, 1994, pp. B5.Google Scholar
[10] Brous, J., “Water Soluble Flux and its Effect on PC Board Insulation Resistance,” Electronic Packaging and Production, Vol.21, No. 7, 1981, p. 80.Google Scholar