Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:28:44.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Archaeometallurgical Implications of New Findings of Traditional Crafts of Making High Tin ‘Delta’ Bronze Mirrors and ‘Beta’ Bronze Vessels in Kerala State of South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sharada Srinivasan*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, and Ian Glover, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, UK
Get access

Abstract

New metallurgical and ethnographic observations of the traditional manufacture of specular high-tin bronze mirrors in Kerala state of southern India are discussed, which is an exceptional example of a surviving craft practice of metal mirror-making in the world. The manufacturing process has been reconstructed from analytical investigations made by Srinivasan following a visit late in 1991 to a mirror making workshop and from her technical studies of equipment acquired by Glover in March 1992 from another group of mirror makers from Pathanamthita at an exhibition held at Crafts Museum, Delhi. Finished and unfinished mirror from two workshops were of a binary, copper-tin alloy of 33% tin which is close to the composition of pure delta phase, so that these mirrors are referred to here as ‘delta’ bronzes. For the first time, metallurgical and field observations were made by Srinivasan in 1991 of the manufacture of high-tin ‘beta’ bonze vessels from Palghat district, Kerala, i‥e of wrought and quenched 23% tin bronze. This has provided the first metallurgical record for a surviving craft of high-tin bronze bowl making which can be directly related to archaeological finds of high-tin bronze vessels from the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia. New analytical investigations are presented of high-tin beta bronzes from the Indian subcontinent which are some of the earliest reported worldwide. These coupled with the archaeometallurgical evidence suggests that these high-tin bronze techniques are part of a long, continuing, and probably indigenous tradition of the use of high-tin bronzes in the Indian subcontinent with finds reported even from Indus Valley sites. While the source of tin has been problematic, new evidence on bronze smelting slags and literary evidence suggests there may have been some sources of tin in South India.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amiet, P., Halim, M. A., Jansen, M., Jarrige, C. and others. 1988. Les cités oubliées de l'Inclus. Paris: Musée National des Arts Asiatiques Guimet and Association Française d'Action Artistique.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. L. and Baker, W. A. 1949. Melting and casting of non-ferrous metals. Symposium on metallurgical aspects of non-ferrous metal melting and casting of ingots fro working, Institute of Metals Monograph & Report Series, 6, 732. London: Institute of Metals.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Glover, I. C. 1992. Decorated high-tin bronzes from Thailand's prehistory. Southeast Asian Archaeology 1990. Glover, I.C. (ed.) Hull University: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 187208.Google Scholar
Biswas, A. K. 1996. Minerals and Metals in Ancient India. Volume I. Archaeological Evidence. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.Google Scholar
Breeks, J. W. 1873. An account of the Primitive tribes and Monuments of the Nilgiris. London: W. H. Allen & Co. Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, D.K. 1979. The problem of tin in India. Man and Environment. 3: 6574 Google Scholar
Deo, S.B. 1991. Roman trade: Recent archaeological discoveries in Western India. In: Begley, V. and De Puma, R. D. (eds). Rome and India: The Ancient Sea Trade. USA: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 82112.Google Scholar
Goodway, M. and Conklin, H. C. 1987. Quenched high-tin bronze from the Philippines. Archaeomaterials. 2(1): 127.Google Scholar
Glover, I. C. 1990. Early Trade Between India and Southeast Asia - a Link in the Development of a World Trading System. Occasional Paper No. 16.(2nd revised ed.) University of Hull: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Keay, J. 1981. India discovered… Leicester: Windward Google Scholar
Kuppuram, G. 1986. Imperial Cholas of Karnataka. Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan.Google Scholar
Leshnik, L. 1974. The Pandukal Complex- South Indian Megalithic Burials Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Malroney, C. 1975. Archaeology of South India-accomplishments and prospects. Essays in South India. Stein, Burton (ed.). Hawaii: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. 1951. Taxila. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Mackay, E. 19371938. Further Excavations at Mohenjodaro. 3 Vol. London.Google Scholar
Meeks, N.D. 1986. Tin-rich surfaces on bronze-some experimental and archaeological considerations. Archaeometry 28(2): 133–62.Google Scholar
Meeks, N. D. 1993a. Patination phenomena on Roman and Chinese high-tin bronze mirrors and other artefacts. In: La Niece, S. and Craddock, P. (eds.) Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 6384.Google Scholar
Meeks, N. D. 1993b Surface characterisation of tinned bronze, high-tin bronze, tinned iron and arsenical bronze. Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. Google Scholar
Paramasivan, S. 1941. Investigations on ancient Indian metallurgy; A pre-historic bronze bowl. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences. 13(2), Sec. A, pp. 8790.Google Scholar
Rajpitak, W. and Seeley, N.J. 1979. The bronze bowls of Ban Don Ta Phet Thailand: an enigma of prehistoric metallurgy. World Archaeology. 11: 2631.Google Scholar
Rajpitak, W. 1983. The Development of Copper-Alloy Metallurgy in Thailand in the pre- Buddhist period with special reference to high-tin bronze. Ph.D. Thesis, London: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Rea, A. 1915. Catalogue of Prehistoric Antiquities from Adichanallur and Perumbair. Madras: Madras Government Museum.Google Scholar
Reeves, M.R., Bowden, J.S. and Cuthbertson, J. W. 1953. Tin bronzes. A report on the micro-structures of those containing 15–28 per cent of tin. Metal Industry, January 16, 1953: 4951.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 1991. Metallography and micro-structure of ancient and historic metals. Singapore: The J. Paul Getty Trust.Google Scholar
Shoukang, Z. and Tangkun, He. 1993. Studies of ancient Chinese mirrors and other bronze artefacts. In: La Niece, S. and Craddock, P. (eds.) Metal Plating and Patination. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Singer, C., Holmyard, E. J., Hall, A. R. and Williams, T.I. (eds.) 1957. A History of Technology. Vol III. From the Renaissance to the Industrial Revolution, c 1500-c 1750. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. 1994. High-tin bronze bowl making in Kerala. Parpóla, A. and Koskikallio, P. (eds.). South Asian Archaeology 1993. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the European Association of South Asian Archaeologists held in Helsinki 5–9 July 1993, Vol. 2. 695706.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. and Glover, I. 1995. Wrought and quenched, and cast high-tin bronzes from Kerala southern India. Journal of Historical Metallurgy. 29(2). Institute of Metals, London.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. In Press. The composition of bronze slags from Kalyadi in South India and the implications for the problem of tin in South Indian antiquity. Archaeological Sciences 1995. Oxbow Archaeological Monograph Series. University of Liverpool in association with Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. 1991. Aranmula kannadi. The enigmatic mirror from Aranmula. The Indie Magazine. Vol. 11, Nov 1991: 5059.Google Scholar
Vijayakumar, M., Ganorkar, M.C., Rao, V.P., Gayathri, P. 1987. A study of Vishnukundin coins. Bulletin of Material Science 9(2): 137–47.Google Scholar