Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:49:54.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lines of Demarcation: Causation, Design-Based Inference, and Historical Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2016

Abstract

Qualitative historical knowledge is essential for validating natural experiments. Specifically, the validity of a natural experiment depends on the historical processes of treatment assignment and administration, including broader macro-historical dynamics. But if validating a natural experiment requires trust in the ability of qualitative evidence to establish the causal processes through which the data were generated, there is no good reason for natural experiments to be considered epistemically superior to historical research. To the contrary, the epistemic status of natural experiments is on a par with that of the historical research on which their validation depends. They are two modes of social-scientific explanation, each with its own pros and cons; neither is privileged. We illustrate this argument by re-examining an important recent contribution to the literature on violent conflict: Ferwerda and Miller’s 2014 natural experiment estimating the causal effect of the German decision to devolve authority to the Vichy French government on violent resistance during World War II.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alary, Eric. 2003. La Ligne de Demarcation (1940–1944). Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Alary, Eric. 2007. “La Ligne de Démarcation.” Revue d’Histoire du Pays Chatelleraudais 13: 523.Google Scholar
American Society of International Law. 1940. “Armistice between France and Germany.” American Journal of International Law (Supplement: Official Documents) 34(4): 173–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, Philippe. 2013. La Résistance confisquée? Les délégués militaires du général de Gaulle de Londres à la Libération. Paris: Éditions Perrin.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhme, Hermann. 1966. Der deutschfranzösische Waffenstillstand im zweiten Weltkrieg. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Calmon, Jean-Henri. 2000. Occupation, Résistance, et Libération dans la Vienne en 30 Questions. La Crèche: Geste Éditions.Google Scholar
Caughey, Devin and Sekhon, Jasjeet. 2011. “Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008.” Political Analysis 19(4): 385408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed. Brady, H. and Collier, D.. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2014. “Improving Process Tracing: The Case of Multi-Method Research.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, ed. Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, Paul. 1968. La S.N.C.F. pendant la guerre: sa résistance à l’occupant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Ferwerda, Jeremy and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2014. “Political Devolution and Resistance to Foreign Rule: A Natural Experiment.” American Political Science Review 108(3): 642–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferwerda, Jeremy and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2015. “Rail Lines and Demarcation Lines.” Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methodology 21: 291313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Général de la Barre de Nanteuil, ed. 1973–1986. Historique des Unités Combattantes de la Résistance 1940–1944. Vols. 1, 9, 11, 12, 18, 20. Vincennes: Ministère des Armées, Etat-major de l’Armée de Terre, Service Historique.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Germany, Auswärtiges Amt. 1961. Archives secretes de la Wilhelmstrasse. Vol. 9, pt. 2. Trans. Tournier, Michel. Paris: Éditions Plon.Google Scholar
Gildea, Robert. 2002. Marianne in Chains: In Search of the German Occupation, 1940–1945. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gildea, Robert. 2015. Fighters in the Shadows: A New History of the French Resistance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. “The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” World Politics 60(1): 3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäckel, Eberhard. 1968. La France dans l’Europe de Hitler. Trans. Meunier, Denise. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
Jackson, Julian. 2001. France, The Dark Years, 1940–1944. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedward, H. R. 1978. Resistance in Vichy France: A Study of Ideas and Motivation in the Southern Zone 1940–1942. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kedward, H. R. 1985. Occupied France: Collaboration and Resistance 1940–1944. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Ltd.Google Scholar
Kedward, H. R. 1993. In Search of the Maquis: Rural Resistance in Southern France, 1942–1944. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke and Titiunik, Rocío. 2014. “Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities.” Political Analysis 23(1): 127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, Matthew Adam, Lawrence, Adria K., and Monteiro, Nuno P.. 2013. “The Rabbit in the Hat: Nationalism and Resistance to Foreign Occupation.” Working paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
Lachapelle, Georges. 1936. Elections legislatives, 26 avril & mai, 1936: résultats officiels. Paris: Le Temps.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2010. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.” World Politics 62(1): 120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Henri. 1950. Histoire de la Résistance en France (1940–1944). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Overy, Richard J. 1973. “Transportation and Rearmament in the Third Reich.” Historical Journal 16(2): 389409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Robert O. 2001[1972]. Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order, 1940–1944. New ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
République Française, Direction de la Statistique Générale. 1938. Résultats statistique du recensement générale de la population effectué le 8 mars 1936. 3 vols. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Samii, Cyrus. 2016. Causal Empiricism in Quantitative Research. Journal of Politics 78(3): 941–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 487508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin. 1977. Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veyret, Patrick. 2001. Mémoire de la Résistance en Saône-et-Loire: Maquis, Forces Spéciales, et SAS. Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne: Editions La Taillanderie.Google Scholar
Wright, Gordon. 1962. “Reflections on the French Resistance (1940–1944).” Political Science Quarterly 77(3): 336–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kocher Supplementary Material

Kocher Supplementary Material

Download Kocher Supplementary Material(File)
File 506.3 KB