No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparisons of the Thermomechanical Fatigue Behavior of C/SIC and SIC/SIC Ceramic-Matrix Composites Subjected to Different Phase Angle
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2018
Abstract
In this paper, the comparisons of thermomechanical fatigue behavior of C/SiC and SiC/SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) subjected to different phase angles of θ = 0, π/3, π/2 and π have been investigated. The relationships between the fatigue damage mechanisms, phase angle, fatigue hysteresis dissipated energy, fatigue hysteresis modulus and fatigue peak strain, fiber/matrix interface debonding and sliding have been established. The differences between C/SiC and SiC/SiC composites under thermomechanical fatigue loading with different phase angles have been analyzed. The damage accumulation of 2.5D C/SiC and 2D SiC/SiC composites under thermomechanical fatigue loading have been predicted. With increasing of the phase angle, the fatigue hysteresis dissipated energy, fatigue peak strain and interface debonded length decrease for the SiC/SiC composite; however, for the C/SiC composite, the fatigue hysteresis dissipated energy, fatigue peak strain and the interface debonded length increase at the same cycle number.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2017
References
REFERENCES
Li, L. B., “Modeling Strength Degradation of Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites under Cyclic Loading at Room and Elevated Temperatures,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 695, pp. 221–229 (2017).Google Scholar
Butkus, L. M., Holmes, J. W. and Nicholas, T., “Thermomechanical Fatigue Behavior of a Silicon Carbide Fiber-Reinforced Calcium Aluminosilicate Composite,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 76, pp. 2817–2825 (1993).Google Scholar
Worthem, D. W., Thermomechanical Fatigue Behavior of Three Ceramic Matrix Composites, Contract NAS3-25266, Sverdrup Technology Inc., Brookpark (1993).Google Scholar
Allen, D. G. and Mall, S., “Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue Behavior of Cross-Ply Ceramic Matrix Composite under Tension-Tension Loading,” Ceramic Engineering Science and Proceeding, 18, pp. 763–770 (1997).Google Scholar
Mei, H. and Cheng, L. F., “Strain Response of C/SiC Composite to Thermal and Mechanical Load Cycling in Oxidizing Atmosphere,” Advances in Applied Ceramics, 107, pp. 83–88 (2008).Google Scholar
Mei, H. and Cheng, L. F., “Thermal Cycling Response Behavior of Ceramic Matrix Composites under Load and Displacement Constraints,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 486, pp. 235–240 (2008).Google Scholar
Kim, T. T., Mall, S. and Zawada, L. P., “Thermomechanical and Fatigue Testing of Woven and Prepreg MI Hi-Nic-S/BN/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs) Using a Unique Combustion Materials Test Facility,” The 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh UK (2009).Google Scholar
Cluzel, C., Baranger, E., Ladeveze, P. and Mouret, A., “Mechancial Behavior and Lifetime Modeling of Self-Healing Ceramic-Matrix Composites Subjected to Thermomechanical Loading in Air,” Composites Part A, 40, pp. 976–984 (2009).Google Scholar
Reynaud, P., Douby, D. and Fantozzi, G., “Effects of Temperature and of Oxidation on the Interfacial Shear Stress between Fibers and Matrix in Ceramic-Matrix Composites,” Acta Mater, 46, pp. 2461–2469 (1998).Google Scholar
Dassios, K. G., Aggelis, D. G., Kordatos, E. Z. and Matikas, T. E., “Cyclic Loading of a SiC-Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Matrix Composite Reveals Damage Mechanisms and Thermal Residual Stress State,” Composites: Part A, 44, pp. 105–113 (2013).Google Scholar
Simon, C., Rebillat, F. and Camus, G., “Electrical Resistivity Monitoring of a SiC/[Si-B-C] Composite under Oxidizing Environments,” Acta Materialia, 132, pp. 586–597 (2017).Google Scholar
Li, L. B., “Tension-Tension Fatigue Behavior of Unidirectional C/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composite at Room Temperature and 800°C in Air Atmosphere,” Materials, 8, pp. 3316–3333 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, L. B., “Comparisons of Interface Shear Stress Degradation Rate between C/SiC and SiC/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composites under Cyclic Fatigue Loading at Room and Elevated Temperatures,” Composite Interface, 24, pp. 171–202 (2017).Google Scholar
Ruggles-Wrenn, M. B. and Jones, T. P., “Tension-Compression Fatigue of a SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composite at 1200°C in Air and in Steam,” International Journal of Fatigue, 47, pp. 154–160 (2013).Google Scholar
Racle, E., Godin, N., Reynaud, P. and Fantozzi, G., “Fatigue Lifetime of Ceramic Matrix Composites at Intermediate Temperature by Acoustic Emission,” Materials, 10, pp. 658 (2017).Google Scholar
Godin, N., Reynaud, P., R'Mili, M. and Fantozzi, G., “Identification of a Critical Time with Acoustic Emission Monitoring during Static Fatigue Tests on Ceramic Matrix Composites: Towards Lifetime Prediction,” Applied Sciences, 6, pp. 43 (2016).Google Scholar
Li, L. B., “A Hysteresis Dissipated Energy-Based Damage Parameter for Life Prediction of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic Matrix Composites under Fatigue Loading,” Composites Part B, 82, pp. 108–128 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, L. B., “Modeling Fatigue Hysteresis Behavior of Unidirectional C/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composite,” Composites Part B, 66, pp. 466–474 (2014).Google Scholar
Li, L. B., “Modeling for Cyclic Loading/Unloading Hysteresis Loops of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic-Matrix Composites at Room and Elevated Temperatures. Part I: Theoretical Analysis,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 164, pp. 117–136 (2016).Google Scholar
Evans, A. G., “Design and Life Prediction Issues for High-Temperature Engineering Ceramics and Their Composites,” Acta mater, 45, pp. 23–40 (1997).Google Scholar
Yang, F. S., “Research on Fatigue Behavior of 2.5D Woven Ceramic Matrix Composites,” M. S. Thesis, Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China (2011).Google Scholar
Shi, J., “Tensile Fatigue and Life Prediction of a SiC/SiC Composite,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, New Orleans, USA (2001).Google Scholar