Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:49:28.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TiB2as a Diffusion Barrier for Cu/<si> Metallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. L. Wang
Affiliation:
National Cheng Kung University, Dept. Materials Science and Engineering Tainan, Taiwan
J. S. Chen
Affiliation:
National Cheng Kung University, Dept. Materials Science and Engineering Tainan, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

TiB2, films deposited by co-sputtering from a boron and a TiB, target are evaluated as the diffusion barrier for Cu metallization. Material characteristics of the TiB, films and metallurgical interactions of the Cu/TiB2/<Si> system annealed at 400−700°C for 30 min, in a 80%Ar+20%H2 flow, were investigated by glancing angle X-ray diffraction, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Sheet resistance was measured for electrical characterization.

The composition and resistivity of the sputtered TiB1 films varied with the bias applied on the substrate. To obtain a low film resistivity, a negative bias of 200V was applied during sputtering. The resulting TiB2 film is nanocrystalline with a resistivity of 300 μΩcm. After copper deposition, the Cu/TiB2/<Si> samples have a constant sheet resistance after annealing up to 600°C for 30min. The overall sheet resistance of the sample increases by five orders of magnitude after annealing at 700°C, and scanning electron micrographs reveal that the sample surface is severely deteriorated after annealing at 700°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nicolet, M.-A., Thin Solid Films 52, 415 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Pramanik, D., Jain, V., Solid State Technology January 1993, p. 73.Google Scholar
3. Samsonov, G. V. and Vinitskii, I. M., Handbook of Refractory Compounds, (IFI/Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 225.Google Scholar
4. Shappirio, J. R., Finnegan, J. J.. and Lux, R. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 4 (1409).Google Scholar
5. Choi, C. S., Ruggles, G. A., Shah, A. S., Xing, G. C., Osbum, C. M. and Hunn, J. D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 3062 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Sade, G. and Pelleg, J., Applied Surface Science 91, 263 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Basu, S. N., Hubbard, K. M., Hirvonen, J- P., Mitchell, T. E.. and Nastasi, M., in Thin Film Structures and Phase Stability, edited by Clemens, B. M. and Johnson, W. L. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 187, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 157160.Google Scholar
8. Blom, H- O., Larsson, T., Berg, S.. and Östling, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 167 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978), p.102.Google Scholar
10. Lohmann, R., Österschulze, E., Thoma, K., Gärtner, H., Herr, W., Matthes, B., Broszeit, E. and Kloos, K.-H., Materials Science and Engineering A139, 259 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Reid, J. S., Kolawa, E., Ruiz, R. P. and Nicolet, M.-A., Thin Solid Films 236, 319 (1993).Google Scholar