Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:37:55.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcome and cost analysis of bilateral sequential same-day cartilage tympanoplasty compared with bilateral staged tympanoplasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

AD Olusesi*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria
O Oyeniran
Affiliation:
ENT Department, National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria
*
Address for correspondence: Dr A D Olusesi, ENT Department, National Hospital Abuja, Plot 132, Central Area, Off Constitution Avenue, Garki Phase 2, FCT 900001, Abuja, Nigeria E-mail: drbiodunolusesi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background:

Few studies have compared bilateral same-day with staged tympanoplasty using cartilage graft materials.

Methods:

A prospective randomised observational study was performed of 38 chronic suppurative otitis media patients (76 ears) who were assigned to undergo bilateral sequential same-day tympanoplasty (18 patients, 36 ears) or bilateral sequential tympanoplasty performed 3 months apart (20 patients, 40 ears). Disease duration, intra-operative findings, combined duration of surgery, post-operative graft appearance at 6 weeks, post-operative complications, re-do rate and relative cost of surgery were recorded.

Results:

Tympanic membrane perforations were predominantly subtotal (p = 0.36, odds ratio = 0.75). Most grafts were harvested from the conchal cartilage and fewer from the tragus (p = 0.59, odds ratio = 1.016). Types of complication, post-operative hearing gain and revision rates were similar in both patient groups.

Conclusion:

Surgical outcomes are not significantly different for same-day and bilateral cartilage tympanoplasty, but same-day surgery has the added benefit of a lower cost.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Guntinal-Lichius, O, Wittenkindt, C, Baier, M, Manni, JJ. Optimizing the pre-treatment process before mobile ear surgery for chronic suppurative otitis media in Wolisso and Attat, Ethiopia. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128:421–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Kabir, MS, Joarder, AH, Ekramuddaula, FM, Uddin, MM, Islam, MR, Habib, MA. Pattern of chronic suppurative otitis media. Mymensingh Med J 2012;21:270–5Google Scholar
3 Olusesi, AD. Otitis media as a cause of significant hearing loss among Nigerians. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:787–92Google Scholar
4 Gianoli, GJ, Soileau, JS. Chronic suppurative otitis media, caloric testing, and rotational chair testing. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Mane, R, Patio, B, Mohite, A, Varute, VV. Bilateral type 1 tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:293–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Raghuwanshi, SK, Asati, DP. Outcome of single-sitting bilateral type 1 tympanoplasty in Indian patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:622–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Kim, CW, Lee, JS, Park, CH, Kwon, SY, Kim, DK, Lee, JH. Comparison of sequential same-day middle ear surgeries: bilateral mastoidectomy, unilateral mastoidectomy with contralateral tympanoplasty, and bilateral tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1395–402Google Scholar
8 Genc, S. A different cartilage graft technique: perichondrium-preserved palisade island graft in tympanoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:e166–70Google Scholar
9 Wu, PW, Wang, WH, Huang, CC, Lee, TJ, Huang, CC. Comparison of short- and long-term hearing outcomes of successful inlay cartilage tympanoplasty between small and large eardrum perforations. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015;8:359–63Google Scholar
10 Heah, H, Soon, SR, Yuen, HW. A case series of complicated infective otitis media requiring surgery in adults. Singapore Med J 2016;57:681–5Google Scholar
11 Kylén, P, Arlinger, SD, Bergholtz, LM. Preoperative temporary threshold shift in ear surgery. An electrocochleographic study. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;84:393401 Google Scholar
12 Rai, AK, Singh, GB, Sahu, R, Singh, S, Arora, R. Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral same day tympanoplasty type 1 in chronic suppurative otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:148–52Google Scholar
13 Ruble, CM, Pensak, ML. Role of aerating mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1924–7Google Scholar
14 Albera, R, Ferrero, V, Lucilla, M, Canale, A. Tympanic membrane perforation in myringoplasty: evaluation of prognostic factors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006;113:875–9Google Scholar
15 Kazikdas, KC, Onal, K, Yildrim, N. Sensorineural hearing loss after ossicular manipulation and drill-generated acoustic trauma in type 1 tympanoplasty with and without mastoidectomy: a series of 51 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2015;94:378–98Google ScholarPubMed
16 Suzuki, S, Yasunaga, H, Matsui, H, Fushimi, K, Yamasoba, T. Factors associated with prolonged duration of post-tympanoplasty local treatment in adult chronic otitis media patients: A retrospective observational study using a Japanese inpatient database. Auris Nasus Larynx 2016;43:377–81Google Scholar
17 Löfgren, J, Mulowooza, J, Nordin, P, Wladis, A, Forsberg, BC. Cost of surgery in a low-income setting in eastern Uganda. Surgery 2015;157:983–91Google Scholar