Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:16:14.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Dating of Mummified Human Remains: Application to a Series of Coptic Mummies from the Louvre Museum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Pascale Richardin*
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France, C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France
Magali Coudert
Affiliation:
Service du Récolement des Dépôts Antiques et des Arts de l'Islam (SRDAI), Musée du Louvre, Pavillon Mollien, 75001 Paris, France
Nathalie Gandolfo
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France, C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France
Julien Vincent
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France, C2RMF, Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France
*
2Corresponding author. Email: pascale.richardin@culture.gouv.fr.

Abstract

Many French museums keep in their reserves a great number of mummified human remains. Beyond any ethical or deontological issues, they constitute an important part of our archaeological and historical heritage. Their dating is often inexact and imprecise, but nevertheless this parameter is very interesting, especially if correlated or associated with other analytical or typological data, e.g. the process of mummification. The present study has been carried out in the context of a multidisciplinary scientific program on a set of Coptic mummies found at the site of Antinoe (Egypt), deposited in the Louvre Museum or sent by the state to various other French museums. To minimize the sample size, we have developed a new method for the pretreatment of hair samples before accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating. Thus, we have taken samples from ≃30 mummies, distributed in 8 museums around France, and also from different textiles or plants near or on the bodies. The results and conclusions show the importance of dating mummies in a museum context. For example, 14C dates permit the exclusion of the assumed relationship of a woman with a child. Similarly, a hair sample from the head of a mummy presents a very different 14C date from that of the hair across her chest. The results show that these hairs came from another mummy and were probably placed there intentionally by the people in charge of the collections.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubert, M, Rutschowscaya, M. 1997. In: Réunion des Musées Nationaux, Guide du visiteur. du Louvre, Musée, editor. Les antiquités égyptiennes, tome 2. Egypte romaine, art funéraire et antiquités coptes. Paris: Musée du Louvre.Google Scholar
Beavan, N, Halcrow, S, MacFadgen, B, Hamilton, D, Buckley, B, Sokla, T, Shewan, L, Sokha, O, Fallon, S, Miksic, J, Armstrong, R, O'Reilly, D, Domett, K, Chhem, KR. 2012. Radiocarbon dates from jar and coffin burials of the Cardamom Mountains reveal a unique mortuary ritual in Cambodia's Late to Post-Angkor period (15th-17th centuries AD). Radiocarbon 54(1):122.Google Scholar
Bocherens, H. 2010. Isotopic analysis of keratin–information about living environment and nutrition. In: Wieczorek, A, Tellenbach, M, Rosendahl, W, editors. Mummies of the World: The Dream of Eternal Life. Munich: Prestel Verlag, p 232–5.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.Google Scholar
Cadot, L. 2007. Les restes humains: une gageure pour les musées? La Lettre de l'OCIM 109:515.Google Scholar
Cottereau, E, Arnold, M, Moreau, C, Baqué, D, Bavay, D, Caffy, I, Comby, C, Dumoulin, JP, Hain, S, Perron, M, Salomon, J, Setti, V. 2007. Artemis, the new 14C AMS at LMC14 in Saclay, France. Radiocarbon 49(2):291–9.Google Scholar
Cybulska, M, Jedraszek-Bomba, A, Kuberski, S, Wrzosek, H. 2008. Methods of chemical and physicochemical analysis in the identification of archaeological and historical textiles. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 16(5):6773.Google Scholar
El-Gaoudy, H, Kourkoumelis, N, Varella, E, Kovala-Demertzi, D. 2011. The effect of thermal aging and color pigments on the Egyptian linen properties evaluated by physicochemical methods. Applied Physics A 105(2):497–507.Google Scholar
Garside, P, Wyeth, P. 2003. Identification of cellulosic fibres by FTIR spectroscopy: thread and single fibre analysis by attenuated total reflectance. Studies in Conservation 48(4):269–75.Google Scholar
Jackson, M, Mantsch, HH. 1995. The use and misuse of FTIR spectroscopy in the determination of protein structure. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30(2):95120.Google Scholar
Lintz, Y, Coudert, M. 2013. Collections égyptiennes d 'Antinoé (Momies, tissus, céramiques et autres antiques)-Envois de l'Etat et dépôts du musée du Louvre (1895–1925). Paris: Musée du Louvre. In press.Google Scholar
Lucejko, JJ, Lluveras-Tenorio, A, Modugno, F, Ribechini, E, Colombini, MP. 2012. An analytical approach based on X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to characterize Egyptian embalming materials. Micro-chemical Journal 103:110–8.Google Scholar
Porto, IM, Laure, HJ, Tykot, RH, de Sousa, FB, Rosa, JC, Gerlach, RF. 2011. Recovery and identification of mature enamel proteins in ancient teeth. European Journal of Oral Sciences 119(1):83–7.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Gandolfo, N, Moignard, B, Lavier, C, Moreau, C, Cottereau, E. 2010a. Centre of Research and Restoration of the Museums of France: AMS radiocarbon dates list 1. Radiocarbon 52(4):1689–700.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Cuisance, F, Buisson, N, Asensi-Amoros, V, Lavier, C. 2010b. AMS radiocarbon dating and scientific examination of high historical value manuscripts: application to two Chinese manuscripts from Dunhuang. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11 (4):398–403.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Gandolfo, N, Carminatti, P, Walter, P. 2011. A new protocol for radiocarbon dating of hair and keratin type samples–application to an Andean mummy from the National Museum of Natural History in Paris. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 3(4):379–84.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Coudert, M, Gandolfo, N, Vincent, J. 2013. Datation par le radiocarbone: étude chronologique des momies et de leur matériel funéraire. In: Lintz, Y, Coudert, M, editors. Collections égyptiennes d'Antinoé (Momies, tissus, céramiques et autres antiques)–Envois de l'Etat et dépôts du musée du Louvre (1895–1925). Paris: Musée du Louvre. In press.Google Scholar
Sowada, K, Jacobsen, GE, Bertuch, F, Palmer, T, Jenkinson, A. 2011. Who's that lying in my coffin? An imposter exposed by 14C dating. Radiocarbon 53(2):221–8.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Van der Sanden, WAB, Aerts, AT, Streurman, HJ. 2004. Dating bog bodies by means of 14C-AMS. Journal of Archaeological Science 31(4):471–91.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, De Moor, A, Benazeth, D. 2004. 14C dating compared to art historical dating of Roman and Coptic textiles from Egypt. Radiocarbon 46(1):231–44.Google Scholar
Wild, EM, Guillen, S, Kutschera, W, Seeidler, H, Steier, P. 2007. Radiocarbon dating of the Peruvian Chachapoya/Inca site at the Laguna de los Condores. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):378–83.Google Scholar