Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:02:19.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Level Waste Package Licensing Considerations for Extrapolating test Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T.C. Johnson
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
K.C. Chang
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
T.L. Jungling
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
L.S. Person
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
C.H. Peterson
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
J.C. Voglewede
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
E.A. Wick
Affiliation:
Division of Waste Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Get access

Abstract

Programs intended to provide supporting information for the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) repository program must consider the licensing requirements and the technical issues involved with extrapolation of short-term test data to periods of up to 10,000 years. The licensing requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the issues the NRC staff considers important for the development of predictive methods, are described. Because performance predictions of the geologic repository and particular components of the waste package must largely be based upon inference, a reasonable assurance, on the basis of the record before the Commission, is the general standard that will be required.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Staff Analysis of Public Comments on Proposed Rule 10 CFR Part 60, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Geologic Repositories,” NUREG-0804 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Thomas, R.E., A Feasibility Study Using Hypothesis Testing to Demonstrate Containment of Radionuclides Within Waste Packages, BMI/ONWI-599 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Nuclear Waste Policy Act (Section 112) Environmental Assessment for Deaf Smith County Site, Texas, DOE/RW-0069 (1986).Google Scholar