Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:46:51.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2007

TERRY HARTIG ,
FLORIAN G. KAISER  and
EINAR STRUMSE
TERRY HARTIG*
Affiliation:
Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Box 785, 80129 Gävle, Sweden
FLORIAN G. KAISER
Affiliation:
Human-Technology Interaction Department, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
EINAR STRUMSE
Affiliation:
Faculty for Health and Social Work, Lillehammer University College, 2626 Lillehammer, Norway
*
*Correspondence: Dr Terry Hartig Tel: +46 26 420 6532 Fax: +46 26 420 6501 e-mail: terry.hartig@ibf.uu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

People may behave in environmentally friendly ways because they gain psychologically from their experiences in natural environments. Psychological benefits of nature experience may also underlie concerns about personally harmful effects of environmental problems. Cross-sectional survey data from 1413 Norwegian adults were used to assess the relationship between use of natural environments for psychological restoration and ecological behaviour, as mediated by personal environmental concern. Mediation tests with hierarchical regression analyses provided evidence of partial mediation; the use of natural environments for restoration remained a significant predictor of ecological behaviour after the entry of environmental concern into the analysis. These associations held independently of age, gender, education, household income, size of community of upbringing, size of community of current residence and distance of current residence from an outdoor recreation area. Among sociodemographic variables, only gender had a significant association with the use of natural environments for restoration, suggesting that their use transcends several important social categories in Norway. In short, positive experiences in natural environments may promote ecological behaviour.

Keywords

conservation behaviourdemographic characteristicsecological behaviourenvironmental attitudesenvironmental concernnature experiencepsychological restoration
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 291 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berto, R. (2005) Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25: 249–259.Google Scholar
Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. (2001) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, W. (2001) ‘Ja tænke det, ønske det; ville det med; - men gøre det!. . .’ En studie av prediktorer for miljøatferd hos ungdom. Nordisk Psykologi 53: 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B.B., Sinkovics, R.R. & Bohlen, G.M. (2003) Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research 56: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. & Heffernan, R.B. (1975) Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: an empirical examination. Rural Sociology 40: 18–30.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (1995) Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues 51: 121–137.Google Scholar
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Fransson, N. & Gärling, T. (1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon-Thompson, S.C. & Barton, M.A. (1994) Ecocenteric an anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T. (1993) Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 25: 17–36.Google Scholar
Hartig, T. (2004) Restorative environments. In: Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology: Volume 3, ed. Spielberger, C., pp. 273–279. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T. & Staats, H. (2006) The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T., Böök, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T. & Gärling, T. (1996) Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 37: 378–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S. & Gärling, T. (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G. & Bowler, P.A. (2001) Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior 33: 590–607.Google Scholar
Hartig, T., Mang, M. & Evans, G.W. (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, F.G. (1998) A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, F.G. (2006) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences 41: 71–81.Google Scholar
Kaiser, F.G. & Wilson, M. (2000) Assessing people's general ecological behavior: a cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30: 952–978.Google Scholar
Kaiser, F.G. & Wilson, M. (2004) Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences 36: 1531–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, F.G., Frick, J. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001) Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens (Accuracy of self-reports: validating the General Ecological Behavior scale). Diagnostica 47: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, F.G., Oerke, B. & Bogner, F.X. (2007) Behavior-based environmental attitude: development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27: 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, F.G., Wölfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A. & Bolger, N. (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. In: Handbook of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (4th edition), ed. Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T. & Lindzey, G., pp. 233–265. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Knopf, R.C. (1983) Recreational needs and behavior in natural settings. In: Behavior and the Natural Environment, ed. Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J.F., pp. 205–240. New York, NY, USA: Plenum.Google Scholar
Knopf, R.C. (1987) Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. In: Handbook of Environmental Psychology: Volume 1, ed. Stokols, D. & Altman, I., pp. 783–825. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Korpela, K.M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G. & Fuhrer, U. (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behavior 33: 572–589.Google Scholar
Manzo, L.C. & Weinstein, M.D. (1987) Behavioral commitment to environmental protection: a study of active and nonactive mem-bers of the Sierra Club. Environment and Behavior 19: 673–694.Google Scholar
Nord, M., Luloff, A.E. & Bridger, J.C. (1998) The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environment and Behavior 30: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. (2006) Physical activity in modern society: is there also an environmental benefit? Environmental Conservation 33: 87–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M. & Griffin, M. (2005) The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 15: 319–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreyer, R. (1989) Motivation for participation in outdoor recreation and barriers to that participation: a commentary on salient issues. In: The President's Commission on Americans Outdoors, Literature Review (Motivations section), pp. 1–8. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W. (2001) The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (2002) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Staats, H. & Hartig, T. (2004) Alone or with a friend: a social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 199–211.Google Scholar
Staats, H., Kieviet, A. & Hartig, T. (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 147–157.Google Scholar
Statistics Norway (2000) Tabell 44. Middelfolkemengd etter Sivilstand, Kjønn og Alder, 1999 (Mean Population by Marital Status, Sex and Age, 1999) [www document]. URL http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/01/10/folkemengde/tab-2000-04-11-44.htmlGoogle Scholar
Stern, P. (1992) Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnik, B.G. & Fidell, S. (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics (4th edition). Boston, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Teisl, M.F. & O'Brien, K. (2003) Who cares and who acts? Outdoor recreationists exhibit different levels of environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior 35: 506–522.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. & Zelson, M. (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Berg, A.E., Koole, S.L. & Van der Wulp, N.Y. (2003) Environmental preference and restoration: (how) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 135–146.Google Scholar
Van Liere, K.D. & Dunlap, R.E. (1980) The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar