Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:30:41.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Voice onset time production in Ecuadorian Spanish, Quichua, and Media Lengua

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2017

Jesse Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewanstewart.jesse@usask.ca

Abstract

In Ecuador there exists a dynamic language contact continuum between Urban Spanish and Rural Quichua. This study explores the effects of competing phonologies with an analysis of voice onset time (VOT) production in and across three varieties of Ecuadorian highland Spanish, Quichua, and Media Lengua. Media Lengua is a mixed language that contains Quichua systemic elements and a lexicon of Spanish origin. Because of this lexical-grammatical split, Media Lengua is considered the most central point along the language continuum. Native Quichua phonology has a single series of voiceless stops (/p/, /t/, and /k/), while Spanish shows a clear voicing contrast between stops in the same series. This study makes use of nearly 8,000 measurements from 69 participants to (i) document VOT production in the aforementioned language varieties and (ii) analyse the effects of borrowings on VOT. Results based on mixed effects models and multidimensional scaling suggest that the voicing contrast has entered both Media Lengua and Quichua through Spanish lexical borrowings. However, the VOT values of voiced stops in Media Lengua align with those of Rural and L2 Spanish while Quichua shows significantly longer prevoicing values, suggesting some degree of overshoot.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2003. Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In Matras & Bakker (eds.), 107–149.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Mous, Maarten. 1994. Mixed languages: Fifteen case studies in language intertwining, vol. 13. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas M. 2012. lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Barbaranne J. 1982. Phonological performance in gerontological speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11, 159167.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeff & Moyle, Maura J.. 2011. Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130, 365371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bijankhan, Mahmood & Nourbakhsh, Mandana. 2009. Voice onset time in Persian initial and intervocalic stop production. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39, 335364.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.47). http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 29 May 2016).Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quichua. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andre M. 1991. Glottal gestures and aspiration in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Esposito, Anna. 2002. On vowel height and consonantal voicing effects: Data from Italian. Phonetica 59 (4), 197231.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1954. Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. Miscellanea Phonetica 2, 4259.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1980. Temporal relations in Danish tautosyllabic CV sequences with stop consonants. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen 14, 207261.Google Scholar
Flege, James & Eefting, Wieke. 1986. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43, 155171.Google Scholar
Gómez-Rendón, Jorge. 2005. La Media Lengua de Imbabura. In Olbertz, Hella & Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Encuentros y Conflictos: Bilingüismo y Contacto de Lenguas en el Mundo Andino, 3958. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua–Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica 60, 98128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, Maureen, Netsell, Ronald & Schulte, Laura. 1998. Vowel-related differences in laryngeal articulatory and phonatory function. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41, 712724.Google Scholar
Jones, Caroline & Meakins, Felicity. 2013. Variation in voice onset time in stops in Gurindji Kriol: Picture naming and conversational speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33, 196220.Google Scholar
Kessinger, Rachel H. & Blumstein, Sheila E.. 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 143168.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B. & Bojesen, Rune. 2014. lmerTest (version 2.0-11). Cran.r Project (accessed 29 May 2016).Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20, 384422.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur. 1967. Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language Speech 10, 128.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Bakker, Peter (eds.). 2003. The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2011. Case marking in contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2013. Mixed languages. In Matras & Bakker (eds.), 159–228.Google Scholar
Meakins, Felicity & Stewart, Jesse. To appear. Mixed languages. In Mufwene, Salikoko & Escobar, Anna Maria (eds.), Cambridge handbook of language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moroz, George. 2017. Lingtypology: Linguistic typology and mapping. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lingtypology (accessed 3 March 2017).Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1997. Media Lengua. In Thomason, Sarah G. (ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective, 365426. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Neiman, Gary, Klich, Richard & Shuey, Elain. 1983. Voice onset time in young and 70-year-old women. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 26, 118123.Google Scholar
Orr, Carolyn. 1962. Ecuador Quichua phonology. Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Pasquale, Michael. 2005. Variation of voice onset time in Quechua–Spanish bilinguals. In López, Luis Ortiz & Lacorte, Manel (eds.), Contactos y contextos lingüísticos. El español en los Estados Unidos y en contacto con otras lenguas, 2nd edn., vol. 27, 227235. Madrid: Lingüística Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon & Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693703.Google Scholar
Petrosino, Linda, Colcord, Roger, Kurcz, Karen & Yonker, Robert. 1993. Voice onset time of velar stop productions in aged speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills 76, 8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 90127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Nicole. 2006. Language contact and Michif stress assignment. Language Typology and Universals 59 (2), 170190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Nicole. 2007. Domains in Michif phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rosen, Nicole, Stewart, Jesse & Cox, Olivia. 2016. A comparative analysis of Michif, Métis French, and Cree vowel spaces. Presented at the NWAV 45, Vancouver. [Retrieved from http://linguistics.arts.sfu.ca/nwav45/, 30 March 2017.]Google Scholar
Rosner, Burton A., López-Bascuas, Luis, García-Albea, José & Fahey, Richard. 2000. Voice-onset times for Castilian Spanish initial stops. Journal of Phonetics 28, 217224.Google Scholar
Ryalls, Jack, Simon, Marni & Thomason, Jerry. 2004. Voice onset time production in older Caucasian- and African-Americans. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 2, 6167.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jesse. 2014. A comparative analysis of Media Lengua and Quichua vowel production. Phonetica 71, 159182.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jesse. 2015a. Production and perception of stop consonants in Spanish, Quichua, and Media Lengua. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jesse. 2015b. Intonation patterns in Pijal Media Lengua. Journal of Language Contact 8, 223262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jesse, Meakins, Felicity, Algy, Cassandra & Joshua, Angelina. To appear. The development of phonological stratification: Evidence from stop voicing perception in Gurindji Kriol and Roper Kriol. Journal of Language Contact 11.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jesse, Rosen, Nicole & Cox, Olivia. 2017. Devoicing of French stops in Michif. Ms., University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Rathcke, Tamara & Macdonald, Rachel. 2005. The private life of stops: VOT in a real-time corpus of spontaneous Glaswegian. Laboratory Phonology 6 (1), 505549.Google Scholar
Torre, Peter & Jessica, A. Barlow. 2009. Age-related changes in acoustic characteristics of adult speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 42, 324333.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik. 2009. The phonology of mixed languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24, 91117.Google Scholar
Weismer, Gary, Weismer, Susan E. & Chicouris, Cyndi. 1979. Vowel durations in the conversational speech of children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65, S33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2017214Google Scholar
Williams, Lee. 1977. The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 5, 169184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zue, Victor W. 1976. Acoustic characteristics of stop consonants: A controlled study. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar