Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:45:45.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new nutrition science project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Geoffrey Cannon  and
Claus Leitzmann
Geoffrey Cannon*
Affiliation:
World Health Policy Forum, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Claus Leitzmann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition Science, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
*
*Corresponding authors: E-mail ClausLeitzmann@aol.com, geoffreycannon@aol.com
*Corresponding authors: E-mail ClausLeitzmann@aol.com, geoffreycannon@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To show that nutrition science, with its application to food and nutrition policy, now needs a new conceptual framework. This will incorporate nutrition in its current definition as principally a biological science, now including nutritional aspects of genomics. It will also create new governing and guiding principles; specify a new definition; and add social and environmental dimensions and domains.

Method

A narrative review of nutrition science, its successes and achievements, and its dilemmas, paradoxes, shortcomings, dissonances and challenges. Reference is made to 16 associated papers. Equal use is made of continuous text and of boxed texts that extend the review and give salient examples.

Results

Recent and current interrelated electronic and genomic discoveries and linked sequential demographic, nutritional and epidemiological shifts, in the context of associated and interlinked global social, cultural, environmental, economic, political and other developments, altogether amount to a world in revolution, requiring all disciplines including that of nutrition science to make comparably radical responses.

Conclusion

Nutrition in principle and practice should be a biological and also an environmental and social science. This new broad integrated structure brings much recent and current progressive work into the centre of nutrition science, and in some ways is a renewal of the period when nutrition science had its greatest impact. It amounts to a map charting well-known and also new worlds. The new nutrition science is concerned with personal and population health, and also with planetary health – the welfare and future of the whole physical and living world of which humans are a part. In this way the discipline will make a greater contribution to the preservation, maintenance, development and sustenance of life on Earth, appropriate for the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Conceptual framework of nutritionPrinciples of nutritionEthical principles of nutritionEcological principles of nutritionEvolution and nutritionHistory and nutritionLife-course approach to nutritionBiotechnology and nutritionGenomics and nutritionHuman rights and nutritionDefinition of nutritionDimensions of nutritionBiological dimension of nutritionEnvironmental dimension of nutritionSocial dimension of nutritionCauses of health and diseaseScientific revolutionsSystems theory and nutrition
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 6a , September 2005 , pp. 673 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Wahlqvist, M. Inauguration. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 667–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Beauman, C, Cannon, G, Elmadfa, I, et al. Principles, definition and dimensions of the new nutrition science. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 695–8.Google Scholar
3Cannon, G. The rise and fall of dietetics and of nutrition science 4000 BCE-2000 CE. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 701–5.Google Scholar
4McMichael, AJ. Integrating nutrition with ecology: balancing the health of humans and biosphere. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 706–15.Google Scholar
5Tudge, C. Feeding people is easy: but we have to re-think the world from first principles. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 716–23.Google Scholar
6Popkin, BM. Using research on the obesity pandemic as a guide to a unified vision of nutrition. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 724–9.Google Scholar
7Lang, T. Food control or food democracy? Re-engaging nutrition with society and the environment. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 730–7.Google Scholar
8Meyer-Abich, KM. Human health in nature – towards a holistic philosophy of nutrition. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 738–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Beaudry, M, Delisle, H. Public('s) nutrition. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 743–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Pettoello-Mantovani, M. The social and environmental dimensions of nutrition science. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 749–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Leitzmann, C. Wholesome nutrition: a suitable diet for the new nutrition science project. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 753–9.Google Scholar
12Vorster, HH, Margetts, BM, Venter, CS, Wissing, MP. Integrated nutrition science: from theory to practice in South Africa. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 760–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Wahlqvist, ML. The new nutrition science: sustainability and development. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 766–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Uauy, R. Defining and addressing the nutritional needs of populations. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 773–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15The Giessen Declaration. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 783–6.Google Scholar
16Leitzmann, C. Cannon, G. Dimensions, domains and principles of the new nutrition science. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 787–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Dubos, R. Effects of disease on populations and on civilization [Chapter VII]. In: Mirage of Health. London: Allen and Unwin, 1960.Google Scholar
18McKeown, T. Determinants of health [Part Two]. In: The Role of Medicine. Dream, Mirage or Nemesis? Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar
19Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization. World Declaration and Plan of Action. International Conference on Nutrition. Rome: FAO, 1992.Google Scholar
20James, WPT, Smitasiri, S, Ul Haq, M, Tagwiryi, J, Norum, K, Uauy, R, et al. Commission on the Nutrition Challenges of the 21st Century. Ending Malnutrition by 2020: An Agenda for Change in the Millennium. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2000; 21(3): 1–88.Google Scholar
21Gibney, M. Preface. In: Gibney, M, Vorster, H, Kok, F, eds. Introduction to Human Nutrition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
22Brock, W, Justus von, Liebig. The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge: University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
23Shetty, P. Nutritional metabolism and malnutrition: a festschrift for John Conrad Waterlow [Chapter 1]. In: Shetty, P ed. Nutritional Metabolism and Malnutrition. London: Smith-Gordon, 2000.Google Scholar
24Heilenz, S. The Liebig-Museum in Giessen. Giessen: Verlag der Ferber'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung, 1996.Google Scholar
25McCollum, E. The end of an era: new horizons [Chapter 28]. In: A History of Nutrition. The Sequence of Ideas in Nutrition Investigations. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1957.Google Scholar
26Medical Research Council (MRC). The Chemical Composition of Foods. MRC Special Report Series No. 235. London: HMSO, 1940.Google Scholar
27Food Standards Agency. McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 6th summary ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2002.Google Scholar
28Roberts, J. History speeds up [Chapter 9]. In: The Triumph of the West. London: BBC, 1985.Google Scholar
29Rivers, J. The profession of nutrition – an historical perspective. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1979; 35 225–32.Google Scholar
30Cannon, G. The Fate of Nations. Food and Nutrition Policy in the New World. London: Caroline Walker Trust, 2003. Also available from the author at geoffreycannon@aol.com.Google Scholar
31Bacon, F. [The second book]. In: The Advancement of Science. London: Macmillan, 1900 [first published 1605].Google Scholar
32Popper, K. A survey of some fundamental problems [Part 1, Chapter 1]. In: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Allen and Unwin, 1955 [first published in German, 1934].Google Scholar
33Cannon, G. What is truth?, and other stories [Out of the Box]. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(5): 444–7.Google Scholar
34Castells, M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3 vols, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
35Castells, M. Making sense of our world [Conclusion]. In: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 3: End of Millennium, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
36Diamond, J. Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Allen Lane, 2005.Google Scholar
37Sen, A. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books, 1999.Google Scholar
38Tudge, C. So Shall We Reap. London: Allen Lane, 2003.Google Scholar
39McMichael, A. Human Frontiers, Environments and Disease. Past Patterns, Uncertain Futures. Cambridge: University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Lewin, K. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill, 1936. See also http//:www.psy.vu.nl/kli/info/htm/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Kuhn, T. Crisis and the emergence of scientific theories [Chapter VII]. In: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University Press, 1970 [first published 1962].Google Scholar
42Fuller, S. From Plato to NATO [Chapter 1]. In: Thomas, Kuhn. A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago, IL: University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
43International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409 860–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Venter, C, Adams, M, Myers, E. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001; 291 1304–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Brundtland, G. Foreword. Genomics and World Health. Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Google Scholar
46Medawar, P. Where plus ultra prevails [Chapter 4]. In: The Limits of Science. Oxford: University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
47Lang, T. Heasman, M. The food wars thesis [Chapter 1]. In: Food Wars. The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan, 2004.Google Scholar
48Nestle, M. Peddling dreams [Chapter 5]. In: Safe Food. Bacteria, Biotechnology and Bioterrorism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
49Garrett, L. The changing face of public health and future global prophylaxis [Epilogue]. In: Betrayal of Trust. The Collapse of Global Public Health. New York: Hyperion, 2000.Google Scholar
50United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination/Sub-committee on Nutrition (ACC/SCN). 4th Report on the World Nutrition Situation. Nutrition Throughout the Life Cycle. Geneva: ACC/SCN in collaboration with the International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
51World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/Food and Agriculture Organization Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
52World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a WHO Study Group. WHO Technical Report Series No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
53The Bellagio Declaration. Nutrition and health transition in the developing world: the time to act. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5(1A): 279–80.Google Scholar
54House of Commons Health Committee. Obesity. Third Report of Session 2003–2004. Vol. 1. London: Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar
55UBS, Warburg. Absolute Risk of Obesity Global Equity Research. London: UBS Warburg, 12 2002.Google Scholar
56Ebbeling, C, Pawlak, D, Ludwig, D. Childhood obesity: public health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 2002; 360: 473–82.Google Scholar
57Schmidhuber, J, Shetty, P. Nutrition transition, obesity and non-communicable diseases: drivers, outlook and concerns. SCN News 2004/2005; (29): 13–20.Google Scholar
58Lobstein, T, Baur, L, Uuay, R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews 2004; 11: 4–85.Google Scholar
59Cannon, G. Animal food, and vitamin A [Chapter 4]. In: The Fate of Nations. Food and Nutrition Policy in the New World. London: Caroline Walker Trust, 2003. Also available from the author at geoffreycannon@aol.com.Google Scholar
60Dubos, R. Hygeia and Asclepius [Chapter V]. In: Mirage of Health. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1960.Google Scholar
61Ackerknecht, E, Rudolf Virchow – Doctor, Statesman, Anthropologist. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1953.Google Scholar
62Popkin, B, Horton, S, Kim, S. The nutrition transition and prevention of diet-related diseases in Asia and the Pacific. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2001; 22(4): 3–58.Google Scholar
63Cabellero, B, Popkin, B, eds. The Nutrition Transition. Diet and Disease in the Developing World. New York: Academic Press, 2002.Google Scholar
64Popkin, B, Nielson, S. The sweetening of the world's diet. Obesity Research 2003; 11(11): 1325–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Walker, P, Rhubart-Berg, P, McKenzie, S, Kelling, K, Lawrence, RS. Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(4): 348–56.Google Scholar
66Dickie, M, Kynge, J. China may shift 500 million people in growth drive. The Financial Times, 28 11 2003.Google Scholar
67Hawkes, C. Marketing activities of global soft drink and fast food companies in emerging markets: a review. Globalization, Diets and Non-Communicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO, 2002.Google Scholar
68McMichael, A. Planetary Overload. Global Environmental Change and the Health of the Human Species. Cambridge: University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
69World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children's Fund. Global Strategy on Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: WHO, 2004 Also available at: http//:www.who.int/.Google Scholar
70World Health Organization (WHO). The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Note for the Press. Geneva: WHO, 2 04 2001.Google Scholar
71 International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN). Science defeats vested interests at the World Health Assembly. Update, IBFAN, 06 2001. Available at http://www.ibfan.org.Google Scholar
72Cannon, G. Food and Health: the Experts Agree. London: Consumers' Association, 1992.Google Scholar
73Singhal, A, Lucas, A. Early origins of cardiovascular disease: is there a unifying hypothesis? Lancet 2004; 363: 1642–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74Gluckman, P, Hanson, M. The Fetal Matrix. Evolution, Development and Disease. Cambridge: University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
75US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Blueprint for Action on Breastfeeding. Washington, DC: DHHS, 2000 Also available at: http//:www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/.Google Scholar
76Eide, W, Kracht, U, ed. Food and Human Rights in Development. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005.Google Scholar
77Swinburn, BA, Caterson, I, Seidell, JC, James, WPT. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7(1A): 123–46.Google Scholar
78Robinson, T, Sirard, J. Prevention of childhood obesity. A solution-orientated research paradigm. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005; 28(Suppl. 2): 194–201.Google Scholar
79Vorster, H, Hautvast, J. Introduction to human nutrition: a global perspective on food and nutrition [Chapter 1]. In: Gibney, M, Vorster, H, Kok, F, eds. Introduction to Human Nutrition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
80 18th International Congress of Nutrition. Nutrition Safari for Innovative Solutions. Programme available at: http//:www.puk.ac.za/iuns.Google Scholar