Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:18:38.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echo-morphological correlates in atrioventricular valvar atresia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2006

Richard M. Martinez  and
Robert H. Anderson
Richard M. Martinez
Affiliation:
The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As we described in the previous review,1 double inlet ventricle is usually found with the atrial chambers connected to a dominant left ventricle, less frequently to a dominant right ventricle, and rarely to a solitary and indeterminate ventricle. As we have also discussed in this supplement,2 double inlet to the left ventricle was, for many years, considered the exemplar of so-called “single ventricle”, despite the fact that such patients unequivocally possess one big and one small ventricle. Echocardiographic interrogation has served to resolve this controversy, showing that such patients make up a significant proportion of those having functionally univentricular hearts. Such echocardiographic investigation has also served to resolve similar controversies regarding patients having tricuspid atresia. For some time, it was argued that patients with tricuspid atresia also had “univentricular hearts”,3 but the logic used to underscore this approach was just as flawed as that used to justify the use of “single ventricle” in patients with double inlet atrioventricular connection.4,5 The increasing use of the Fontan procedure has served to demonstrate that these patients, along with many having mitral atresia in the setting of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, also have functionally univentricular arrangements. As we will show in this review, however, the anatomical substrates found in patients with atrioventricular valvar atresia are much more complex than those seen in the setting of double inlet ventricle. This is because atrioventricular valvar atresia can be produced either by absence of one atrioventricular connection, or by presence of an imperforate valvar membranes closing completely one or other of the two normal atrioventricular junctions. This important difference, combined with multiple segmental combinations, produces a bewildering array of potential anatomical substrates, with the complications magnified by the fact that, when one atrioventricular connection is absent, the other atrioventricular junction can be shared between the two ventricles, the so-called uniatrial and biventricular arrangement.6 In our review, we will first describe the anatomical options, before concentrating our attention on the more frequent patterns seen in clinical practice.

Keywords

Tricuspid atresiamitral atresiafunctionally univentricular heartDoppler interrogation
Type
Research Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 16 , Supplement S1: Controversies and Challenges in the Management of the Functionally Univentricular Heart , February 2006 , pp. 27 - 34
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cook AC, Anderson RH. The anatomy of hearts with double inlet ventricle. Cardiol Young 2006; 16 (Suppl 1): 9–13.Google Scholar
Jacobs ML, Anderson RH. Nomenclature of the functionally univentricular heart. Cardiol Young 2006; 16 (Suppl 1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Becker AE, Macartney FJ, Shinebourne EA, Wilkinson JL, Tynan MJ. Is “tricuspid atresia” a univentricular heart? Pediatr Cardiol 1979; 1: 51–56.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Macartney FJ, Tynan M, et al. Univentricular atrioventricular connection: the single ventricle trap unsprung. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4: 273–280.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Becker AE, Tynan M, Macartney FJ, Rigby ML, Wilkinson JL. The univentricular atrioventricular connection: getting to the root of a thorny problem. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 822–828.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Ho SY, Rigby ML. The morphologic variability in atrioventricular valvar atresia. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 32–41.Google Scholar
Orie JD, Anderson C, Ettedgui J, Zuberbuhler JR, Anderson RH. Echocardiographic–morphologic correlations in tricuspid atresia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 750–758.Google Scholar
Thiene G, Daliento L, Frescura C, De Tommasi M, Macartney FJ, Anderson RH. Atresia of the left atrioventricular orifice. Anatomical investigation in 62 cases. Br Heart J 1981; 45: 393–401.Google Scholar
Mickell JJ, Mathews RA, Anderson RH, et al. The anatomical heterogeneity of hearts lacking a patent communication between the left atrium and the ventricular mass (“mitral atresia”) in presence of a patent aortic valve. Eur Heart J 1983; 4: 477–486.Google Scholar
Allan LD, Anderson RH, Cook AC. Atresia or absence of the left-sided atrioventricular connection: echocardiographic diagnosis and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 295–302.Google Scholar
Restivo A, Ho SY, Anderson RH, Cameron H, Wilkinson JL. Absent left atrioventricular connection with right atrium connected to morphologically left ventricular chamber, rudimentary right ventricular chamber, and ventriculoarterial discordance. Problem of mitral versus tricuspid atresia. Br Heart J 1982; 48: 240–248.Google Scholar
Snider AR, Serwer GA, Ritter SB. Echocardiography in Pediatric Heart Disease, 2nd edition. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., Philadelphia, 1997.