Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:33:37.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE INTENSIVE MARGIN PUZZLE AND LABOR MARKET ADJUSTMENT COSTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Dennis Wesselbaum*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg, German Physical Society, IfW Kiel and EABCN
*
Address correspondence to: Dennis Wesselbaum, Methods in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle Park 5, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; e-mail: Dennis.Wesselbaum@wiso.uni-hamburg.de.

Abstract

This paper documents a puzzling fact, namely that there is a significant negative relation between employment protection legislation and the usage of the intensive margin of labor market adjustments. I make use of a real business cycle model and introduce search and matching frictions as well as adjustment costs along the extensive and the intensive labor market margins. I show that the model is able to replicate the observed patterns of cyclicality, volatility, and especially the behavior of extensive and intensive margins if we assume low firing costs and relatively high hours adjustment costs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, Alessio, Merkl, Christian, and Snower, Dennis J. (2010) An Incentive Theory of Matching. Kiel working paper 1512.Google Scholar
den Haan, W., Ramey, G., and Watson, J. (2000) Job destruction and the propagation of shocks. American Economic Review 90 (3), 482498.Google Scholar
Dolado, Juan J., Jansen, Marcel, and Jimeno, Juan F. (2005) Dual Employment Protection Legislation: A Framework for Analysis. IZA discussion paper 1564.Google Scholar
Fujita, Shigeru and Ramey, Garey (2009) The cyclicality of separation and job finding rates. International Economic Review 2, 415430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Gary D. (1985) Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 16 (3), 309327.Google Scholar
Justiniano, Alejandro and Michelacci, Claudio (2011) The Cyclical Behavior of Equilibrium Unemployment and Vacancies in the US and Europe. NBER working paper 17429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konya, Istvan and Krause, Michael U. (2008) Wage Dynamics and Labor Market Dynamics. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Krause, Michael U. and Lubik, Thomas (2007) The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictions. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 706727.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn E. and Prescott, Edward C. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50 (6): 13451370.Google Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. (2009) Estimating a search and matching model of the aggregate labor market. Economic Quarterly 95, 101120.Google Scholar
Merkl, Christian and Wesselbaum, Dennis (2011) Extensive vs. intensive margin in Germany and the United States: Any differences? Applied Economics Letters 18 (9), 805808.Google Scholar
Merz, Monika (1995) Search in the labor market and the real business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 36 (2): 269300.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Dale T. and Pissarides, Christopher A. (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61 (3), 397415.Google Scholar
Ohanian, Lee E. and Raffo, Andrea R. (2011) Hours Worked over the Business Cycle in OECD Countries, 1960–2010. Meeting paper 558, Society for Economic Dynamics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Carlos and Zanetti, Francesco (2009) Labor market reform and price stability: An application to the Euro area. Journal of Monetary Economics 56, 885899.Google Scholar
Trigari, Antonella (2006) The Role of Search Frictions and Bargaining for Inflation Dynamics. IGIER working paper 304.Google Scholar