Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:11:15.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards an Immanent Conception of Economic Agency: Or, A Speech on Metaphysics to its Cultured Despisers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2017

Christopher Yeomans  and
Justin Litaker
Christopher Yeomans
Affiliation:
Purdue University, USAcyeomans@purdue.edu
Justin Litaker
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama, USAjlitaker@southalabama.edu
Get access

Abstract

When it comes to social criticism of the economy, Critical Theory has thus far failed to discover specific immanent norms in that sphere of activity. In response, we propose that what is needed is to double down on the idealism of Critical Theory by taking seriously the sophisticated structure of agency developed in Hegel’s own account of freedom as self-determination. When we do so, we will see that the anti-metaphysical gestures of recent Critical Theory work in opposition to its attempts to develop immanent critique. In this paper we first briefly reconsider Axel Honneth’s project as it concerns economic institutions and then respond by returning to the problem of freedom and articulating a view according to which the problem of individual self-determination and the problem of social production are the same problem seen from different angles. Then we present briefly Hegel’s own social theory from this perspective before moving on to trace the outlines of such a critical theory of contemporary capitalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 2: Hegel and Critical Theory , October 2017 , pp. 241 - 265
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alznauer, M. (2015), Hegel’s Theory of Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arentshorst, H. (2015), ‘Social Freedom in Contemporary Capitalism: A Reconstruction of Axel Honneth’s Normative Approach to the Economy’, Studies in Social & Political Thought 25: 132–150.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2012), The Scope of Autonomy: Kant and the Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. (2015), The Mythology of Work: How Capitalism Persists Despite Itself. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (2011), Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Gesammelte Werke Vol. 14,3). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hermann-Pillath, C. and Boldyrev, I. (2014), Hegel, Institutions and Economics: Performing the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1982), “Labor and Instrumental Action”. New German Critique 26: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. J. Anderson. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2009), ‘Work and Recognition: A Redefinition’, in H.-C. Schmidt am Busch and C. Zurn (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition. Lanham MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2010), ‘Arbeit und Anerkennung. Versuch einer Theoretischen Neubestimmung’, in Das Ich Im Wir. Studien Zur Anerkennungstheorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2014), Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, trans. J. Ganahl. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. and Marcelo, G. (2013), ‘Recognition and Critical Theory Today: An Interview with Axel Honneth’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 39:2: 209–221.Google Scholar
Hms.harvard.edu. (2011), ‘Insomnia Costing U.S. Workforce $63.2 Billion a Year, Researchers Estimate’. [online] Available at: http://hms.harvard.edu/news/insomnia-costing-us-workforce-632-billion-year-researchers-estimate-9-2-11 [accessed 18 May 2016].Google Scholar
Jaeggi, R. (2014), Alienation, trans. F. Neuhouser and A. E. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1937), ‘The General Theory of Employment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 51:2: 209–223.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. (2015), Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Litaker, J. (2014), Capitalism and Social Agency. Dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1988), Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2008), Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. (2012), ‘The Role of Work within the Process of Recognition in Hegel’s Idealism’, in N. H. Smith and J.-P. Deranty (eds.), New Philosophies of Labour: Work and the Social Bond. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2011), Freedom and Reflection: Hegel’s Logic of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2015a), ‘Power as Control and the Therapeutic Effects of Hegel’s Logic’, Hegel Bulletin 36:1: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2015b), The Expansion of Autonomy: Hegel’s Pluralistic Philosophy of Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, C. (2016), ‘The Ends of Economic History: Alternative Teleologies and the Ambiguities of Normative Reconstruction’, forthcoming in H.-C. Schmidt am Busch (ed.), Die Philosophie des Marktes. Deutsches Jahrbuch der Philosophie 7 . Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar