Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:27:14.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Struggle for Clinical Authority: Shifting Ontologies and the Politics of Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Uffe Juul Jensen
Uffe Juul Jensen
Affiliation:
Health, Humanity and Culture, Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Denmark E-mail: filujj@hum.au.dk
Get access

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine emerged in connection with struggles for clinical authority in the second half of the twentieth century, as patient-centred medicine and community-oriented medicine presented challenges to laboratory-oriented medicine. The renowned medical researchers Alvan Feinstein and Archie Cochrane helped to develop the new models of patient-centred and community-oriented medicine respectively. They made important contributions to methodological reflections in medicine, and also contributed to social theories about clinical medicine and health care, challenging and criticizing in different ways dominant ontological medical understandings (such as essentialist conceptions of disease and illness). The medical ontologies of patient-centred and community-oriented medicine comprise different (partly incompatible) perspectives on what constitutes standards of evidence, something reflected, for example, in Feinstein and Cochrane’s contrary views on the importance of controlled trials. The analysis of their work in this article illuminates the connection between medical ontologies, standards of evidence and the political in general, reminding us of the need to explore the role of politics in discussions of evidence-based medicine.

Keywords

clinical authorityclinical epidemiologyCochraneFeinsteinpolitics of evidence
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 2 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The Construction and Governance of Randomised Controlled Trials , March 2007 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, A.M., & Gardner, M. (2000). The golden age of medicine? In Cooter, R. & Pickstone, J. (Eds), Companion to medicine in the twentieth century, 21–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
Daly, J. (2005). Evidence-based medicine and the search for a science of clinical care. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubos, R. (1965). Man adapting. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feinstein, A.R. (1967). Clinical judgement. New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Feinstein, A.R. (1994). Clinical judgement revisited: The distraction of quantitative models. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 799–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinstein, A., & Horwitz, R.I. (1997). Problems in the ‘evidence’ of ‘evidence-based medicine’. American Journal of Medicine, 103, 529–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flexner, A. (1910). Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K.W. (2003). Ethics and evidence-based medicine: Fallibility and responsibility in clinical science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (2003). Health wars: On the global front lines of modern medicine. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Jensen, U.J. (1987). Practice and progress: A theory for the modern health care system. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Jensen, U.J. (2004). Evidence, effectiveness and ethics: Cochrane’s legacy. In Kristiansen, I.S. & Mooney, G. (Eds), Evidence-based medicine: In its place, 20–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1979/1798). The conflict of the faculties. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, I., & Mooney, G. (2004). Evidence-based medicine: In its place. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Fanu, J. (1999). The rise and fall of modern medicine. London: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeown, T. (1976). The rise of medicine—Dream, mirage or nemesis. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.Google Scholar
McCormick, R.L. (1981). The discovery that business corrupts politics: A reappraisal of the origins of progressivism. American Historical Review, 86, 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, H.M. (1997). The progress of experiment: Science and therapeutic reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (1993). Fourth edn; eighth impression (with corrections). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P.G., Garline, J.D., Inue, T.S., Larsen, E., Logerfo, J., Norun, J.et al. (1991). Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 1103–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, S. (2000). The anatomy of evidence-based practice. In Trinder, L. with Reynolds, S. (Eds), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, C. (1979). The therapeutic revolution: Medicine, meaning and social change in nineteenth-century America In Vogel, M.J. & Rosenberg, C. (Eds), The therapeutic evolution: Essays in the social history of American medicine, 3–25. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., & Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, C. (1976). The concept of the political. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, G.H. (1907). The commercial domination of therapeutics and the movement for reform. Journal of the American Medical Association, 48, 1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). Social theory as practice. In Taylor, C. (Ed.), Philosophy and the human sciences, 91–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L. (1984). The youngest science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Trinder, L. (2000). Introduction: The context of evidence-based practice. In Trinder, L. with Reynolds, S. (Eds), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal, 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virchow, R. (1975/1869). Über die Heutige Stellung der Pathologie. In Rothschuh, K.E. (Ed.), Was ist Krankheit?, 72–91. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, W. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar