Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:27:11.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Induced Antagonism in Rapid Response Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2017

Nick T. Harre ,
Julie M. Young  and
Bryan G. Young
Nick T. Harre*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Julie M. Young
Affiliation:
Researcher, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: N. T. Harre, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 (Email: nharre@purdue.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate application to the rapid-response (RR) biotype of glyphosate-resistant (GR) giant ragweed ensues in loss of foliage via rapid tissue death, thereby reducing glyphosate translocation. Experiments were performed to determine if this GR response, in contrast to a non-rapid response (NRR) GR biotype, results in antagonism of the selective herbicides atrazine, cloransulam, dicamba, lactofen, and topramezone. Application of glyphosate at 1,680 g ae ha–1 in the greenhouse resulted in antagonism between all five selective herbicides for the RR biotype, whereas glyphosate applied at 420 g ha–1 was antagonistic only for cloransulam. Application of selective herbicides 2 d prior to glyphosate treatment avoided the antagonism observed in the RR biotype. In the field, glyphosate mixtures with dicamba and topramezone were antagonistic on the RR biotype across both 2015 and 2016 field seasons. Thus, the RR effectively reduces glyphosate efficacy but also has potential to diminish the activity of glyphosate mixtures with selective herbicides, and the degree of antagonism between these mixtures escalates at increasing glyphosate rates.

Keywords

Ian Burke, Washington State UniversityAtrazinecloransulamdicambaglyphosatelactofentopramezonegiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRFoliar herbicide applicationsherbicide interactionsherbicide resistanceherbicide resistance mechanismrapid necrosis
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 52 - 59
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazzaz, FA (1979) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. II. Germination, emergence, growth and survival. New Phytol 83:817–827 Google Scholar
Belfry, KD, Sikkema, PH (2015) Preplant and postemergence control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in corn. Agr Sci 6:256–262 Google Scholar
Bethke, RK, Molin, WT, Sprague, C, Penner, D (2013) Evaluation of the interaction between glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Sci 61:41–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 Google Scholar
Follings, J, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.): 2,4-D dose response and control with postemergence herbicides in soybean. Am J Plant Sci 4:1790–1798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, JE, Mao, MK, Sikorski, JA eds (1997) Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. 678 pGoogle Scholar
Harre, NT, Nie, H, Robertson, RR, Johnson, WG, Weller, SC, Young, BG (2017) Distribution of herbicide-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Indiana and characterization of distinct glyphosate-resistant biotypes. Weed Sci 65:699–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, NT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG, Young, BG (2016) Environmental factors moderate the glyphosate-induced antagonism of tank-mix herbicides on rapid necrosis glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed. Page 78 in Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society. Des Moines, IA: North Central Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT, Webb, JE (2001) Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci 49:224–229 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: January 31, 2017Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Kruger, GR (2014) Control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) with 2,4-D followed by pre-emergence or post-emergence herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max L.). Am J Plant Sci 5:2289–2297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WG, Loux, M, Nordby, D, Sprague, C, Nice, G, Westhoven, A, Stachler, JM (2007) Biology and Management of Giant Ragweed. Glyphosate, Weeds, and Crops Series Bulletin GWC-12. http://www.glyphosateweedscrops.org. Accessed September 14, 2016Google Scholar
Mann, RK, Masters, RA, McMaster, S, Peterson, M, Sorribas Amela, M, Wright, TR, inventors; Dow Agrosciences, assignee (2015) June 25. Synergistic herbicidal weed control from combinations of 2,4-D–choline and glyphosate. US patent 20150173371 A1Google Scholar
Moechnig, MJ (2003) A Mechanistic Approach to Predict Weed–Corn Growth Interactions. Ph.D dissertation. Madison, WI: University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
Moretti, ML, Van Horn, CR, Robertson, RR, Segobye, K, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Johnson, WG, Sammons, RD, Wang, D, Ge, X, d’Avignon, A, Gaines, TA, Westra, P, Green, AC, Jeffery, T, Lesperance, MA, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH, Hall, C, McLean, MD, Lawton, MB, Schulz, B (2017) Glyphosate resistance in Ambrosia trifida: Part 2. Rapid response physiology and non-target site resistance. Pest Manag Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.4569 Google Scholar
Nandula, VK, Wright, AA, Van Horn, CR, Molin, WT, Westra, P, Reddy, KN (2015) Glyphosate resistance in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) from Mississippi is partly due to reduced translocation. Am J Plant Sci 6:2104–2113 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Riar, D, Jha, P, Scott, RC (2011) Confirmation, control, and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 25:430–435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, JD, Keeling, JW, Dotray, PA (2014) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) management in Gly Tol® LibertyLink® cotton. Weed Technol 28:592–600 Google Scholar
Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK, Loux, MM, Holloman, C, Venkatesh, R, Diekmann, F, Taylor, R, Ford, RA, Stoltenberg, DE, Hartzler, RG, Davis, AS, Schutte, BJ, Cardina, J, Mahoney, KJ, Johnson, WG (2016) Certified crop advisors’ perceptions of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) distribution, herbicide resistance, and management in the Corn Belt. Weed Sci 64:361–377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, EB, Bradley, KW (2014) Influence of application timing and glyphosate tank-mix combinations on the survival of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in soybean. Weed Technol 28:1–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, JR, Hallett, SG, Johnson, WG (2012) Response of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes to glyphosate in the presence and absence of soil microorganisms. Weed Sci 60:641–649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ (2007) Biology and Ecology of Ambrosia trifida L. Seedling Emergence. Ph.D dissertation. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Segobye, K (2013) Biology and Ecology of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.). M.S. thesis. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
Selleck, GW, Baird, DD (1981) Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci 29:185–190 Google Scholar
Shaw, DR, Arnold, JC (2002) Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol 16:1–6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachler, JM (2008) Characterization and management of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) and horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.]. Ph.D dissertation. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Starke, RJ, Oliver, LR (1998) Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci 46:652–660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Acker, RC, Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1993) The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci 41:194–200 Google Scholar
Van Horn, CR, Moretti, ML, Robertson, RR, Segobye, K, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Johnson, WG, Schulz, B, Green, AC, Jeffery, T, Lesperance, MA, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH, Hall, C, McLean, MD, Lawton, MB, Sammons, RD, Wang, D, Westra, P, Gaines, TA (2017) Glyphosate resistance in Ambrosia trifida: I. Novel rapid cell death response to glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.4567 Google Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control with preplant herbicides in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci 92:913–922 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Loux, MM, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (1994) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 8:559–564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G, Altland, JE, Gilliam, CH (2008) Interaction of glyphosate and diquat in ready-to-use weed control products. Weed Technol 22:472–476 Google Scholar
Westhoven, AM, Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2008) Field presence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) biotypes with elevated tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Technol 22:544–548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar