Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:33:26.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

JOHN WILSON CROKER: PATRONAGE AND CLIENTAGE AT THE ADMIRALTY, 1809–1857

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2000

C. I. HAMILTON
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

J. W. Croker's papers are a valuable and rare source concerning British government patronage of the first half of the nineteenth century. They show us a system that was burdensome for the participants, made more acceptable since it was an extension of gentlemanly civility. The papers also show that patronage, like government generally, was able somewhat to reform itself. True, in his particular sphere as patron – as first secretary to the Admiralty (1809–30) – Croker favoured his relatives, but appointed only those he thought fit, and supervised and controlled their work in a way not feasible outside a family. Nepotism could mean efficiency. It created a Croker family circle within the Admiralty that lasted until the 1860s. Croker continued to have influence as a patron until he died in 1857. He was aided by his network of friendships, but also there was the obligation felt by those in power – of whatever party – to Croker's long years of Admiralty service. Political links had their importance, but is is argued that the three factors of family, friendship, and service were predominant. His career as patron illustrates a vital stage between ‘old corruption’ and competitive entry to the civil service.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank the William L. Clements Library, University of Michigan, and the William R. Perkins Library, Duke University, for kindly giving permission to quote from their collections of Croker manuscripts. I must also thank the staff at these two institutions for their generous welcome and encouragement to a visiting researcher. Particular thanks are owed to Mr William R. Erwin Jr of the Perkins for first introducing me to the genealogical tools that made it possible to trace some of the ramifications of Mr Croker's extended family, and his enthusiasm for the inquiry. I must also thank my colleague Dr Richard Cope for commenting on a draft of the present article, though he cannot be held in any way to blame for the remaining faults. Generous subventions from the CSD of Pretoria and the University of the Witwatersrand made possible the research for this article: neither body is responsible for the conclusions reached herein.