Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:39:03.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and changing attitudes towards the Earth in the nuclear age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2013

JODI BURKETT
JODI BURKETT*
Affiliation:
School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies, University of Portsmouth, Milldam, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3AS. Email: jodi.burkett@port.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nuclear age had a profound impact on politics and international affairs. More fundamentally, it altered the way people saw the planet and their relationship with it. These attitudes changed gradually in the post-war period, with the 1960s a key transitional moment. This article explores these changing attitudes towards the environment within the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). At the beginning of the 1960s CND's concerns about nuclear testing and fallout fit easily into the dominant anthropocentric view of the environment. However, by the end of the decade they espoused a much more holistic, even ecocentric, attitude. This article examines how attitudes towards the environment were changing in the 1960s through a close examination of attitudes within CND, and argues that the modern environmental movement was a product of the nuclear age.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4: Special Issue: British Nuclear Culture , December 2012 , pp. 625 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Caldwell, Malcolm, ‘The threat to our children’, Sanity (August 1969), p. 1Google Scholar.

2 Oxford Dictionary online. Last accessed 27 March 2012, available at http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/environmentalist?q=environmentalism#environmentalist__3.

3 Throughout this article the terms ‘nature’ and the ‘environment’ have been used interchangeably to refer to ideas about the planet. This terminology, however, does have different meanings for different groups and does change throughout the time period covered here. For a discussion of the difficulty of this terminology see Macnaghten, Phil and Urry, John, Contested Natures, London: Sage, 1998Google Scholar.

4 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 15.

5 Watling, Tony, Ecological Imaginations in the World Religions: An Ethnographic Analysis, London: Continuum, 2009, p. 20Google Scholar.

6 de Steiguer, J.E., Age of Environmentalism, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997, p. 16Google Scholar.

7 Veldman, Meredith, Fantasy, the Bomb, and the Greening of Britain: Romantic Protest, 1945–1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994Google Scholar.

8 Watling, op. cit. (5), p. 15.

9 Watling, op. cit. (5), p. 17.

10 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3).

11 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 12.

12 The term ‘conservation’ was not used in Britain until the 1950s. For a discussion of the use of this term see Clapp, B.W., An Environmental History of Britain, London: Longman, 1994, p. 1Google Scholar.

13 For a discussion of the tradition of ‘romantic’ protest in Britain and CND's place within it see Veldman, op. cit. (7).

14 Peggy Duff, ‘Letter to Bertrand Russell’, 24 January 1958, Bertrand Russell Archives, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, X3 Nuclear Disarmament (630). See also her discussion of the creation of the campaign in Duff, Left, Left, Left: A Personal Account of Six Protest Campaigns, 1945–65, London: Allison & Busby, 1971, pp. 118Google Scholar ff.

15 Gibbs, Olive, ‘The vital choice for CND’, Sanity (October 1966), p. 8Google Scholar.

16 Hudson, Kate, CND – Now More Than Ever: The Story of a Peace Movement, London: Vision Paperbacks, 2005, p. 57Google Scholar.

17 Brandon, Ruth, The Burning Question: The Anti-nuclear Movement since 1945, London: Heinemann, 1987, p. 60Google Scholar.

18 For a further discussion of CND's place within British nuclear culture see Nehring, Holger, ‘National internationalists: British and West German protests against nuclear weapons, the politics of transnational communications and the social history of the Cold War, 1957–1964’, Contemporary European History (2005) 14, pp. 559–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Burkett, Jodi, ‘Re-defining British morality: “Britishness” and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 1958–1968’, Twentieth Century British History (2010) 21, pp. 184–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Frank E. Myers, ‘British peace politics: the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the Committee of 100, 1957–1962’, PhD thesis, Columbia University, 1965, p. 45.

20 Myers, op. cit. (19), p. 46.

21 For a discussion of the anti-nuclear action in Britain before CND see especially Liddington, Jill, The Long Road to Greenham Common: Feminism and Anti-militarism in Britain since 1820, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1991, pp. 185–186Google Scholar.

22 Grant, Matthew, After the Bomb: Civil Defence and Nuclear War in Britain, 1945–68, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Bauer, Martin W., Petkova, Kristina, Boyadjieva, Pepka and Gornev, Galin, ‘Long-term trends in the public representation of science across the “Iron Curtain”: 1946–1995’, Social Studies of Science (2006) 36, pp. 99–131, 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a discussion of the theoretical implications of assessing the reception of media coverage see Houlb, R.C., Crossing Borders: Reception Theory, Poststructuralism, Deconstruction, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992Google Scholar; Thompson, Martyn B., ‘Reception theory and the interpretation of historical meaning’, History and Theory (1993) 32, pp. 248–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Poole, Robert, Earthrise: How Man First Saw the Earth, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008, p. 4Google Scholar.

25 Lent, Adam, British Social Movements since 1945: Sex, Colour, Peace and Power, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, p. 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Grant, op. cit. (22), p. 1.

27 Grant, op. cit. (22), p. 1.

28 Young, Wayland, Strategy for Survival: First Steps in Nuclear Disarmament, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1959, p. 40Google Scholar.

29 Myers, op. cit. (19), p. 83; Hudson, op. cit. (16), p. 41.

30 Burkett, Jodi, ‘Direct action and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, 1958–1962’, in Hilton, Matthew, McKay, James and Crowson, Nick (eds.), NGOs in Contemporary Britain: Non-state Actors in Society and Politics since 1945, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009, pp. 21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 John Collins, Canon L., Faith under Fire, London: Leslie Frewin, 1966, p. 300Google Scholar.

32 Miller, Richard Lee, Under the Cloud: The Decades of Nuclear Testing, The Woodlands, TX: Two Sixty Press, 1986, p. 193Google Scholar.

33 For some examples of this reporting see ‘Dangers of fallout: Congressional inquiry planned’, The Times, 8 March 1957; ‘Fallout to last “for 100 Years”. Dr. Pauling's warning’, The Times, 4 September 1959; ‘Watch on possible fallout in food’, The Times, 20 October 1961.

34 ‘New assessment ordered of nuclear fallout: government anxiety over Russian tests, House of Lords’, The Times, 19 October 1961.

35 Stanley Kramer (dir.), On the Beach, 1959.

36 ‘Youth report on their “On the Beach” campaign’, Sanity (October 1963).

37 For a discussion of the politics of this treaty and its importance for the Cold War see Mastny, Vojtech, ‘The 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: a missed opportunity for detente?’, Journal of Cold War Studies (2008) 10, pp. 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 ‘They still die in Hiroshima’, Sanity (August 1964), p. 1.

39 ‘Two steps nearer’, Sanity (June 1966), pp. 4–5.

40 Kennedy, Michael, ‘We should rejoice’, Sanity (July 1967), p. 1Google Scholar.

41 Kennedy, op. cit. (40), p. 33.

42 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 36.

43 Nehring, Holger, ‘The British and West German protests against nuclear weapons and the cultures of the Cold War, 1957–64’, Contemporary British History (2005) 19, pp. 223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Veldman, op. cit. (7), p. 3.

45 ‘Building instead of blasting’, Sanity (July 1962), p. 1.

46 ‘Letter to the Editor from Nigel Young’, Sanity (November 1968), p. 7.

47 Bourdet, Claude, ‘A super-state with a super-bomb’, Sanity (March 1969), p. 3Google Scholar.

48 For a discussion of some aspects of this nostalgia for rural Britain see Gilroy, Amanda (ed.), Green and Pleasant Land: English Culture and the Romantic Countryside, Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2004Google Scholar; Clapp, op. cit. (12).

49 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 13.

50 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 35.

51 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3).

52 Clapp, op. cit. (12), p. 8.

53 See, for example, Marwick, Arthur, The Sixties: Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy and the United States, c.1958–1974, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998Google Scholar; Donnelly, Mark, Sixties Britain: Culture, Society and Politics, Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2005Google Scholar; DeGroot, Gerard, The Sixties Unplugged, London: Pan Macmillan, 2009Google Scholar.

54 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 44.

55 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 47.

56 Lanthier, Isabelle and Olivier, Lawrence, ‘The construction of environmental “awareness”’, in Darier, Eric (ed.), Discourses of the Environment, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 63–78, 69Google Scholar.

57 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 33.

58 De Steiguer, op. cit. (6), p. 2.

59 Bulkeley, Rip et al. , ‘“If at first you don't succeed …”: fighting against the Bomb in the 1950s and 1960s’, International Socialism (1981) 1, p. 9Google Scholar.

60 Veldman, op. cit. (7), p. 211.

61 For a discussion of this disaster see Sheail, John, ‘Torrey Canyon: the political dimension’, Journal of Contemporary History (2007) 42, pp. 485–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 49.

62 Lanthier and Olivier, op. cit. (56), 64.

63 Clapp, op. cit. (12).

64 Bramwell, Anna, Ecology in the 20th Century: A History, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar, quoted in Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 34.

65 Christopher Rootes, ‘Environmental NGOs and the environmental movement in England’, in Crowson, Hilton and McKay, op. cit. (30), pp. 201–221, 207.

66 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), pp. 46–47.

67 Poole, op. cit. (24), p. 8.

68 Poole, op. cit. (24), p. 142.

69 Lazier, Benjamin, ‘Earthrise; or, the globalization of the world picture’, American Historical Review (2011) 116, pp. 602–630, 605–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Other events, such as the creation and controversy surrounding Peter Watkins's film The War Game, also helped create this public knowledge about the impact of nuclear weapons. See Phillip Drummond, ‘The War Game: British Drama’, Museum of Broadcast Communications, available at www.museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=wargamethe, last accessed 14 February 2011; Chapman, James, ‘The BBC and the censorship of The War Game (1965)’, Journal of Contemporary History (2006) 41, pp. 75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wayne, Mike, ‘Failing the public: the BBC, The War Game and revisionist history. A reply to James Chapman’, Journal of Contemporary History (2007) 42, pp. 627–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chapman, James, ‘The War Game controversy – again’, Journal of Contemporary History (2008) 43, pp. 105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 For a discussion of CND as a single-issue pressure group see Nehring, op. cit. (18), p. 581.

72 For a discussion of the many divisions within CND see Duff, Left, Left, Left, op. cit. (14), pp. 143 ff.

73 It was not just environmental concerns that CND increasingly took up. They became a space for a wide-ranging critique of the international Cold War system. See Nehring, op. cit. (43), p. 224; Nehring, op. cit. (18), p. 563. For criticism of the limits of this widening of interests from the Trotskyite left see Bulkeley et al., op. cit. (59), p. 10.

74 ‘The teenagers who revolutionised a village’ Sanity (June 1964), p. 6.

75 Caldwell, Malcolm, ‘The desperate race to feed the world’, Resistance (February 1966) 3/11, pp. 14–17Google Scholar.

76 Caldwell, Malcolm, ‘The Bomb and the world of 1969’, Sanity (February 1969), p. 4Google Scholar.

77 Caldwell, Malcolm, ‘False gods and fundamentals’, Sanity (April 1969), p. 4Google Scholar.

78 Lanthier and Olivier, op. cit. (56), pp. 67–8.

79 Caldwell, op. cit. (1), p. 1.

80 Caldwell, Malcolm, ‘What we need to do – a policy for the next year’, Sanity (October 1969), p. 6Google Scholar.

81 Oakes, Sheila, ‘How to win in the 1970s’, Sanity (September 1969)Google Scholar.

82 Nigel Young has written extensively on CND and the British peace movement. See Taylor, R.K.S. and Young, Nigel, Campaigns for Peace: British Peace Movements in the Twentieth Century, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987Google Scholar; Young, The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Peace, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar.

83 Young, Nigel, ‘We are a coalition’, Sanity (June 1971)Google Scholar.

84 Minnion, John, ‘We must be concerned with global survival’, Sanity (July 1971)Google Scholar.

85 ‘Fallout still polluting crops’, Sanity (April 1971).

86 ‘Pollution – is CND interested?’, Sanity (July 1971), pp. 4–5.

87 ‘National Council Meeting’, Sanity (August 1971).

88 ‘Under-ground’, Sanity (October 1971).

89 Hancox, Dorothy, ‘Thinking about our future’, Sanity (August 1971), p. 7Google Scholar.

90 Nettleton, Dick, ‘We've a lot to be proud of’, Sanity (November–December 1971)Google Scholar.

91 Macnaghten and Urry, op. cit. (3), p. 54.