Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:31:55.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conductivity Anisotropy in Epitaxial 6H and 4H Sic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

William J. Schaffer
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., 2810 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
G. H. Negley
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., 2810 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
K. G. Irvine
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., 2810 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
J. W. Palmour
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., 2810 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
Get access

Abstract

A measure of the electron mobility anisotropy in n-type 4H and 6H-SiC has been obtained using the Hall effect over the temperature range 80K<T<600K. Hall mobility and resistivity data are collected from appropriately oriented bar patterns fabricated into high quality epitaxial material grown on (1100) or (1120)surfaces having total impurity concentrations 1017-1018 cm-3. The observed mobility ratio for 4H is μ[1120]/[0001] and is independent of temperature. For 6H, the ratio μ[1100]/[0001] decreases from ∼6.2 at 80K to ∼5.0 at 150K and is essentially constant (∼4.8) above 200K. A donor level near 0.6 eV is occasionally observed in 4H which reduces the high temperature electron mobility and introduces an apparent temperature dependence to the mobility ratio if nonuniformly distributed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Patrick, L.A., Mat. Res. Bull. 4, 129 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Lomakina, G.A. and Vodakov, Yu.A., Fiz. Tverd. Tela [Leningrad] 15, 123 (1973) [Sov. Phys. Solid State 15, 83 (1973)].Google Scholar
3. Bosch, G., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 27, 795 (1966).Google Scholar
4. Schnabel, P., Philips Res. Repts. 19, 43 (1964).Google Scholar
5. van der Pauw, L., Philips Res. Repts. 13, 1 (1958).Google Scholar
6. Schaffer, W., Kong, H., Negley, G., Palmour, J., Proc. 1993 ICSCRM, Phys. Stat. Solidi, (in press).Google Scholar
7. Caughey, D.M. and Thomas, R.E., Proc. IEEE 55, 2192 (1967).Google Scholar
8. Barrett, D.L. and Campbell, R.B., J. Appl. Phys. 38, 53 (1967).Google Scholar
9. Patrick, L.A., J. Appl. Phys. 38, 50 (1967).Google Scholar
10. Long, D., Phys. Rev. 120, 2024 (1960).Google Scholar
11. Brooks, H., Phys. Rev. 83, 879 (1951).Google Scholar
12. Bardeen, J. and Schockley, W., Phys. Rev. 80, 72 (1950).Google Scholar
13. Debye, P.P. and Conwell, E.M., Phys. Rev. 93, 693 (1954).Google Scholar
14. Pensi, G. (private communication).Google Scholar