Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:29:55.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Parity of Participation’ and the Politics of Needs Interpretation: Engagement with Roma Migrants in Manchester

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2017

PIETER COOLS
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat 2–4, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium email: Pieter.cools@uantwerpen.be
DANIELE VIKTOR LEGGIO
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Languages, and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: daniele.leggio@manchester.ac.uk
YARON MATRAS
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Languages, and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: yaron.matras@manchester.ac.uk
STIJN OOSTERLYNCK
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat 2–4, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium email: stijn.oosterlynck@uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Service providers in Western welfare states have to engage with an increasingly differentiated citizenry. The arrival of new migrant communities triggers debates, negotiations and struggles over the needs of these communities and how service providers can engage with them. In this paper, we look at these processes of developing local social inclusion policies that target migrant communities through the perspective of Nancy Fraser's ‘politics of need interpretation’. More specifically, we analyse Roma engagement strategies in Manchester. We do so by reconstructing how the presence of Romanian Roma emerged as a public issue leading to various engagement strategies and how different actors competed over the interpretation of the needs of the Roma community and the best ways to respond to them. We use Fraser's notion of ‘parity of participation’ to draw attention to the position of the Roma community itself in the process of interpreting needs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, H. R. (2012), Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Breuer, F. and Roth, W-M. (2003), ‘Subjectivity and Reflexivity in the Social Sciences: Epistemic Windows and Methodical ConsequencesForum Qualitative Research, 4 (2). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/698/1511 (accessed 2/04/2017).Google Scholar
Clark, C. R. (2014), ‘Glasgow's Ellis Island? The Integration and Stigmatisation of Govanhill's Roma Population’, People, Place and Policy, 8, 1, 3450.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. and Brock, K. (2005), ‘What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at “participation”, “empowerment” and “poverty reduction”’ Third World Quarterly, 26, 7, 10431060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, K., Gray, M. and Webb, S., A. (2014), ‘Putting the Parity into Service-User Participation: An Integrated Model of Social JusticeInternational Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 2, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C., Wetherell, M. and Barnett, E. (2007), Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Health Care Decisions, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2015), Social Rights and Human Welfare, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, L. and Gough, B. N. (eds.) (2003), Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences, Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (1989), Unruly Practices. Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2013), Fortunes of Feminism. From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y., Saruis, T., Wukovitsch, F., Cools, P. and Novy, A. (2013), ‘How to study social innovation in poverty analysis. Methods and methodologies’, ImPRovE Working Paper D14.1, Antwerpen. Available at: http://improve-research.eu/?page_id=406 (accessed 2/04/2017).Google Scholar
Kostadinova, G. (2011), ‘Minority Rights as a Normative Framework for Addressing the Situation of Roma in Europe’ Oxford Development Studies, 39, 2, 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, J. (2012), A Report into the Impact of Multi-Agency Work Supporting Roma Children in Education, Manchester, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9716892.pdf (acessed 15/08/2016).Google Scholar
Lupton, R., Burchardt, T., Fitzgerald, A., Hills, J., McKnight, A., Obolenskaya, P., Stewart, Kitty., Thomson, S., Tunstall, R. and Vizard, P. (2015), The Coalition's Social Policy Record: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 2010–2015, Social Policy in a Cold Climate. London. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/RR04.pdf (acessed 15/08/2016).Google Scholar
Marushiakova, E. and Popov, V. (2015), ‘European Policies for Social Inclusion of Roma: Catch 22?Social Inclusion, 3, 5, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. (2000), ‘Romani Migrations in the Post‐communist Era: Their Historical and Political SignificanceReview of International Affairs, 13, 2, 3250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. (2013), ‘Scholarship and the Politics of Romani Identity: Strategic and Conceptual Issues’ in European Yearbook of Minority Issues, edited by Åkermark, S., Bloed, S., Hofmann, R., Malloy, T.H., Marko, J., Packer, J. and Weller, M., 10, pp. 209–45. BRILL/Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2015), The Romani Gypsies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Fabeni, G. B., Leggio, D. V. and Vránová, E. (2009), the Roma Community in Gorton South, Manchester. Manchester, http://romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/downloads/2/report.pdf. (acessed 15/08/2016).Google Scholar
Matras, Y., Leggio, D. V. and Steel, M. (2015), ‘Roma Education as a Lucrative Niche: Ideologies and Representations’ Zeitschrift Für Internationale Bildung Und Entwicklungspädagogik,38, 1, 1117.Google Scholar
McGarry, A. (2012), ‘The Dilemma of the European Union's Roma Policy’ Critical Social Policy, 32, 1, 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, A. (2014), ‘Roma as a Political Identity: Exploring Representations of Roma in Europe’ Ethnicities, 14, 6, 756–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MigRom. (2014), Black Health Agency (BHA) Engagement with Roma in Manchester (2013-2014): An Evaluation, Manchester, http://romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/migrom/docs/Evaluation.pdf.Google Scholar
MigRom. (2015), Report on the Extended Survey (University of Manchester), Manchester. http://migrom.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Yr2report_Mcr.pdf. (Accessed 05/12/2015).Google Scholar
Mills, E. and Wilson, A. (2013), Roma Strategy 2011–2014, Manchester. http://romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/migrom/docs/MCCRomaReport2013.pdf. (Acessed 05/12/2015).Google Scholar
Murphy, J. (2013), What's Working for Roma in School. A Network Learning Book. In Partnership with 6 Manchester Schools, Manchester,. http://whatsworking.eu/files/A_network_learning_book.pdf. (Accessed 05/12/2015)Google Scholar
Nacu, A. (2012), ‘From Silent Marginality to Spotlight Scapegoating? A Brief Case Study of France's Policy towards the Roma’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 8, 1323–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. and Clarke, J. (2009), Publics, Politics & Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrooten, M., Withaeckx, D., Geldof, D. and Lavent, M. (2016), Transmigration. Social work in a world of super diversity, Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Scullion, L. and Brown, P. (2013), What's Working?’: Promoting the Inclusion of Roma in and through Education. Transnational Policy Review and Research Report, Manchester, http://www.romasmile.com/library-files/what's working-promoting the inclusion of roma in and through education.pdf. (accessed 05/12/2015).Google Scholar
Timmer, A. D. (2010), ‘Constructing the ‘needy Subject’: NGO Discourses of Roma Need’ PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 33, 2, 264–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trehan, N. (2001), ‘In the Name of the Roma? The Role of Private Foundations and NGOs’ in Between Past and Future. the Roma of Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Guy, W., pp. 134–49. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar