Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:49:59.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dividends and Debt under Alternative Tax Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

William K. H. Fung  and
Michael F. Theobald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The impact of corporate taxes on the leverage decision in a competitive market was analyzed in [8[, [9], and the incorporation of personal taxes into the problem structure was achieved in [4], [1] and [10]. In a more recent paper, Miller [6] suggested that the impacts of both corporate and personal taxation could be studied by simultaneously analyzing the supply of and demand for securities in an overall equilibrium framework. DeAngelo and Masulis [2], [3] formalized and extended the implications of Miller's model, but found that given the U.S. tax code, an equilibrium in which positive dividends were featured was not possible over and above the relatively small dividend exclusion provision.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 59 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Brennan, M. “Taxes, Market Valuation and Corporate Financial Policy.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 23 (12 1970), pp. 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]DeAngelo, H., and Masulis, R.. “Leverage and Dividend Irrelevancy under Corporate and Personal Taxation.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 35 (05 1980), pp. 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]DeAngelo, H., and Masulis, R. “Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 8 (03 1980), pp. 3–301.Google Scholar
[4]Farrar, D., and Selwyn, L.. “Taxes, Corporate Financial Policies and Returns to Investors.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 20 (12 1967), pp. 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Litzenberger, R., and Van Home, J.. “Elimination of the Double Taxation of Dividends and Corporate Financial Policy.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 33 (06 1978), pp. 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Miller, M. “Debt and Taxes.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (05 1977), pp. 261–275.Google Scholar
[7]Miller, M., and Scholes, M.. “Dividends and Taxes.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 6 (12 1978), pp. 333–364.Google Scholar
[8]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 48 (06 1958), pp. 261–297.Google Scholar
[9]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M.. “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.” American Economic Review, Vol. 53 (06 1963), pp. 433–442.Google Scholar
[10]Stapleton, R. “Taxes, The Cost of Capital, and the Theory of Investment.” The Economic Journal, Vol. 82 (12 1972), pp. 1273–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Stapleton, R.. “Tax Systems and Corporate Financing Policy.” Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, New York University, (1978 1).Google Scholar