Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:39:41.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of animal production: improving productivity and sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

D. A. HUME ,
C. B. A. WHITELAW  and
A. L. ARCHIBALD
D. A. HUME*
Affiliation:
The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9PS, UK
C. B. A. WHITELAW
Affiliation:
The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9PS, UK
A. L. ARCHIBALD
Affiliation:
The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9PS, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: david.hume@roslin.ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The challenge for the next 50 years is to increase the productivity of major livestock species to address the food needs of the world, while at the same time minimizing the environmental impact. The present review presents an optimistic view of this challenge. The completion of genome sequences, and high-density analytical tools to map genetic markers, allows for whole-genome selection programmes based on linkage disequilibrium for a wide spectrum of traits, simultaneously. In turn, it will be possible to redefine genetic prediction based on allele sharing, rather than pedigree relationships and to make breeding value predictions early in the life of the peak sire. Selection will be applied to a much wider range of traits, including those that are directed towards environmental or adaptive outcomes. In parallel, reproductive technologies will continue to advance to allow acceleration of genetic selection, probably including recombination in vitro. Transgenesis and/or mutagenesis will be applied to introduce new genetic variation or desired phenotypes. Traditional livestock systems will continue to evolve towards more intensive integrated farming modes that control inputs and outputs to minimize the impact and improve efficiency. The challenges of the next 50 years can certainly be met, but only if governments reverse the long-term disinvestment in agricultural research.

Type
Foresight Project on Global Food and Farming Futures
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 149 , Issue S1: FORESIGHT PROJECT ON GLOBAL FOOD AND FARMING FUTURES , February 2011 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aflatoonian, B. & Moore, H. (2006). Germ cells from mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Reproduction 132, 699–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brotherstone, S., White, I. M., Coffey, M., Downs, S. H., Mitchell, A. P., Clifton-Hadley, R. S., More, S. J., Good, M. & Woolliams, J. A. (2010). Evidence of genetic resistance of cattle to infection with Mycobacterium bovis. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1234–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, J., Pierce, K. M., Berry, D. P., Brennan, A. & Horan, B. (2009). The influence of genetic selection and feed system on the reproductive performance of spring-calving dairy cows within future pasture-based production systems. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5258–5269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, J. J., McGee, M., Kenny, D. A., Crews, D. H. Jr, Evans, R. D. & Berry, D. P. (2010). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 88, 885–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO (2009). Declaration of the World Food Summit on Food Security, Rome, 16–18 November 2009. Rome: FAO. Available online at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/Meeting/018/k6050e.pdf (verified 25 September 2010).Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. (2002). The history of artificial insemination: selected notes and notables. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M. & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R. D. (2009). Future needs in animal breeding and genetics. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 793–800.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J., Chamberlain, A. J., Savin, K., Van Tassell, C. P., Sonstegard, T. S. & Goddard, M. E. (2009). A validated genome wide association study to breed cattle adapted to an environment altered by climate change. PLoS ONE 4, e6676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. (2010). Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins-Taylor, K. & Xu, R. H. (2010). Determinants of pluripotency: from avian, rodents to primates. Journal of Cell Biochemistry 109, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mench, J. A. (2002). Broiler breeders: feed restriction and welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 58, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. & Goddard, M. (2010). Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome sequencing. Genetics 185, 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothschild, M. F. & Plastow, G. S. (2008). Impact of genomics on animal agriculture and opportunities for animal health. Trends in Biotechnology 26, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V.Rosales, M. & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow. Environmental Issues and Options. FAO Report. Rome: FAO. Available online at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/A0701E/A0701E00.pdf (verified 25 September 2010).Google Scholar
Van Der Steen, H. A. M., Prall, G. F. W. & Plastow, G. S. (2005). Application of genomics to the pork industry. Journal of Animal Science 83 (E suppl.), E1–E8.Google Scholar
Zhou, M., Hernandez-Sanabria, E. & Guan, L. L. (2009). Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 6524–6533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed