Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:01:01.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instabilities in laminar separation bubbles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

J.-C. Robinet*
Affiliation:
DynFluid Laboratory, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
*
Email address for correspondence: Jean-Christophe.Robinet@ensam.eu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Wall-bounded flows, in their transition from a laminar state to turbulence, pass through a set of particular stages characterized by different physical processes. Among wall-bounded flows, separated flows have a special place because their dynamics can either be noise amplifiers or oscillators. For several years Marxen and co-workers have been studying the evolution of two- and three-dimensional perturbations in the laminar part of a laminar separation bubble. In Marxen et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, p. 58) they study vortex formation and its evolution in laminar–turbulent transition in a forced separation bubble. By the combined use of numerical and experimental methods, different mechanisms of secondary instabilities have been highlighted: elliptic instability of vortex cores and hyperbolic instability responsible for three-dimensionality in the braid region. This work shows, for the first time in laminar separation bubbles, the first nonlinear stages of transition to turbulence of such a flow. However, since this type of flow is very sensitive to various environmental stresses, several scenarios for transition to turbulence remain to be explored.

Type
Focus on Fluids
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

References

Alizard, F., Cherubini, S. & Robinet, J.-C. 2009 Sensitivity and optimal forcing response in separated boundary layer flows. Phys. Fluids 21, 064108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherubini, S., Robinet, J.-C. & De Palma, P. 2010 The effects of non-normality and non-linearity of the Navier–Stokes operator on the dynamics of a large laminar separation bubble. Phys. Fluids 22, 014102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, M. 1969 The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda no. 3595. HMSO.Google Scholar
Marxen, O. & Henningson, D. S. 2011 The effect of small-amplitude convective disturbances on the size and bursting of a laminar separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 671, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxen, O., Lang, M. & Rist, U. 2013 Vortex formation and vortex breakup in a laminar separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 728, 5890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxen, O. & Rist, U. 2010 Mean flow deformation in a laminar separation bubble: separation and stability characteristics. J. Fluid Mech. 660, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012 The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear-layer flow transition. Part 1 shear aligned convection, pairing, and braid instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, I. 1964 Low speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog. Aero. Sci. 5, 70103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar