Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:54:45.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carryover of DPX-PE350 to Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and Soybean (Glycine max) on Two Arkansas Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
David H. Johnson ,
William G. Johnson ,
J. Andrew Kendig ,
Robert E. Frans  and
Ronald E. Talbert
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
David H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
J. Andrew Kendig
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine carryover potential to grain sorghum and soybean of DPX-PE350 applied POST at 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 kg ai ha−1 to cotton the previous year. DPX-PE350 did not injure soybean or affect yield adversely. Grain sorghum was injured and maturity delayed on a Sharkey silty clay but not on a Calloway silt loam. Grain sorghum yield was reduced on both soils 16 and 22%, respectively, by residues from the 0.1 and 0.2 kg ha−1 rates of DPX-PE350. In an incubation study, dissipation of DPX-PE350 was greater at 35 C than at 5 C., and did not differ between the two soils.

Keywords

DPX-PE350, 2-chloro-6-(4,5-dimethoxy pyrimidin-2-ylthio)benzoatecotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. 'Stoneville 825’grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Warner-744DR’soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Forrest’Herbicide carryoverherbicide persistenceGossypium hirsutum
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 645 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baird, D. L., Knake, E. L., and Paul, L. E. 1989. Effect of pH, tillage, and rate on residual effect of chlorimuron on corn. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 29:91–92.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Basham, G., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burger, A. W. 1984. Crop classification. p. 1–12 in Tesar, M. B., ed. Physiological Basis of Crop Growth and Development. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Eisner, J. E., Smith, C. W., and Owen, D. F. 1979. Uniform stage descriptions of upland cotton. Crop Sci. 19:361–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Goetz, A. J., Lavy, T. L., and Gbur, E. E. Jr. 1990. Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Goetz, A. J., Wehjte, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnson, D. H. 1988. Influence of soil humic and organic matter on the activity of metribuzin, fluometuron, and imazaquin. M.S. thesis. Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72701. 64 pp.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, prirrusulfuron, imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol. 7:641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kendig, A. J., Jordan, D. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1990. Carryover potential of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, and KIH-8921 (DPX-PE350) to winter wheat. Abstr. Ark. Agric. Pestic. Assoc. 29:8–9.Google Scholar
12. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Loux, M. M. and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Majka, J. T. and Lavy, T. L. 1977. Adsorption, mobility, and degradation of cyanazine and diuron in soils. Weed Sci. 25:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Mitchell, W. H., Crowder, S. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. “Staple”—A new cotton herbicide from duPont. p. 1318 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 6-10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
17. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Paul, E. A. and Clark, F. E. 1989. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 273 p.Google Scholar
19. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1968. Atrazine degradation in two soils. Weed Sci. 17:202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Residual fluometuron levels in three Arkansas soils under continuous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production. Weed Sci. 34:122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Savage, K. E. 1978. Persistence of several dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 26:465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Schroeder, J. and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence and activity of norflurazon and fluridone in five Georgia soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 34:599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Shea, P. J. 1985. Detoxification of herbicide residues in soil. Weed Sci. 33:(Suppl. 2)33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Talbert, R. E., Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., Johnson, D. H., Wichert, R. A., Ruff, D. F., and McCarty, J. T. 1990. Field screening of new chemicals for herbicidal activity—1989. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 396. 22 p.Google Scholar
28. Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Webster, E. P., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 1993. Persistence of Staple (DPX-PE350) in a heavy black belt soil. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:(in press).Google Scholar
30. Weise, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in a Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar