Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:56:15.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition Theory

A Review of a Research Framework and Two Exemplary Books

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

David Birdsong
David Birdsong
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 331 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berwick, R. C. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989a). Lux et verisimilitudo: Judgment data in SLA theory. Paper presented at the 14th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989b). Metalinguistic performance and intertinguistic competence. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (in press). On the notion of “critical period” in UG/L2 theory: A response to Flynn & Manuel. In Eubank, L. (Ed.), Poin-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1986). Hypothesis testing in second language acquisition theory. Language Learning, 36, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (in press). Second language processing of subordinate clauses and anaphora—first language and universal influences. Language Learning.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. W, & Ioup, G. I. (1988). The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 1–32.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1987). Commentary: Mechanisms of language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 443–466). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33, 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C., & Russell, G. (1989). The validity of elicited imitation as a measure of second language competence. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1982). Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1985). Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners. Second Language Research, 2, 93–112.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1988). Language learners' extrapolation of word order in Micro-Artificial Languages. Language Learning, 38, 497–529.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1989). The effect of age on first language acquisition. Paper presented at the 14th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
DuPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L, & White, L. (1987). UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research, 3, 56–75.Google Scholar
Eubank, L. (1989). Parameters in L2 learning: Flynn revisited. Second Language Research, 5, 43–73.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. (1987). Contrast and construction in a parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 19–62.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. (1989). The role of the head-initial/head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers. In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 89–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., & Manuel, S. (in press). Age-dependent effects in language acquisition: “Critical period” hypotheses. In Eubank, L. (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (1989). Second language acquisition theory: The case for a generative perspective. In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–100.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1981). Learnability, restrictiveness, and the evaluation metric. In Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J. (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1989). The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 321–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1987). Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Nagata, H. (1988). The relativity of linguistic intuitions: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, H. (1989). Effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective and subjective self-awareness conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinney, M. (1987). The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 221–238). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1987). Preemption and the learning of L2 grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1989). L2 knowledge: What is the null hypothesis? Paper presented at the 14th Boston University Conference on Language Development,Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Manzini, R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–76). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1984). Universal Grammar as a source of explanation in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 13th University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Symposium on Current Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
White, L. (1985a). Is there a “logical problem” of second language acquisition? TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 2, 29–41.Google Scholar
White, L. (1985b). The “pro-drop” parameter in adult second language acquisition. language Learning, 35, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1987). Implications of learnability theories for second language learning and teaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée (AILA), Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989a). The adjacency condition on case assignment: Do L2 learners observe the Subset Principle? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 134–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989b). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar