Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:49:55.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Current – Voltage Characteristics of N and P Type 6H-SiC Schottky Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Q. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
V. Madangarli
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
T. S. Sudarshan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Forward and reverse current – voltage (I–V) characteristics of N and P-type Schottky diodes on 6H-SiC are compared in a temperature range of room temperature to 550K. While the room temperature I–V characteristics of the N-type Schottky diode after turn-on is more or less linear up to ∼ 100 A/cm2, the I–V characteristics of the P-type Schottky diode shows a non-linear behavior even after turn-on, indicating a variation in the on-state resistance with increase in forward current. For the first time it is shown that at high current densities (> 210 A/cm2) the forward voltage drop across P type Schottky diodes is lower than that across N type Schottky diodes on 6H-SiC. High temperature measurements indicate that while the on-state resistance of N type Schottky diodes increases with increase in temperature, the on-state resistance of P type Schottky diodes decreases with increase in temperature until a certain temperature. While the N-type diodes seem to have soft breakdown characteristics, the P-type diodes exhibit more or less abrupt breakdown characteristics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wahab, Q., Ellison, A., Zhang, J., Forsberg, U., Duranova, E., Henry, A., Madsen, L.D., and Janzén, E., Materials Science Forum Vols. 338–342, pp.1171, (2000).Google Scholar
2. Schröder, Chr., Heiland, W., Held, R., and Loose, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol.68 (14), pp.1957, (1996).Google Scholar
3. Saxena, V., Su, J. Nong, and Steckl, A.J., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol.46 (3), pp. 456, (1999).Google Scholar
4. Wahab, Q., Ellison, A., Henry, A., Janzén, E., Hallin, C., Persio, J. Di., and, Martinez, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol.76 (19), pp.2725, (2000).Google Scholar
5. Yamanaka, M., Daimon, H., Sakuma, E., Misawa, S., and Yoshida, S., J. Appl. Phys. Vol.61(2), pp. 599, (1986).Google Scholar
6. Wang, X., et al., presented in MRS'2000 Fall, Boston, 2000.Google Scholar
7. Bluet, J. M., Pernot, J., Camassel, J., Contreras, S., Robert, J. L., Michaud, J.F., and Billon, T., Journal of Applied Physics, Vol.88 (4), pp. 1971, (2000).Google Scholar
8. Saxena, V. and Steckl, A. J., Materials Science Forum Vols. 264–268 pp. 937, (1998).Google Scholar
9. Schroder, D. K., Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, John-Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1998).Google Scholar
10. Raghunathan, R., and Baliga, B. J., IEEE Transactions on Electron Device Letters, Vol.19 (3), pp. 71, (1998).Google Scholar
11. Schaffer, W. J. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol.339, pp.595, (1994).Google Scholar