Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:50:58.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Structure of Pd3Fe(111) and Effects of Oxygen Adsorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Xiaofang Yang
Affiliation:
xiy206@Lehigh.edu, Lehigh University, Chemistry, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Lindsey A. Welch
Affiliation:
law306@lehigh.edu, Lehigh University, Chemistry, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Jie Fu
Affiliation:
jif208@lehigh.edu, Lehigh Universtiy, Chemistry, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Bruce E. Koel
Affiliation:
brk205@lehigh.edu, Lehigh Universtiy, Chemistry, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Get access

Abstract

Pd-Fe alloys have attracted attention in PEM fuel cell research because they were found to be comparable to Pt electrocatalysts in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics at the cathode. In this study, the surface morphology of a Pd3Fe(111) single-crystal sample and oxygen reaction on the surface were investigated by low energy electron diffraction (LEED), low energy ion scattering (LEIS), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions. Strong segregation of Pd atoms was observed after annealing in UHV. Particularly, Pd single adatoms and dimers were found on the surface after high temperature annealing, which differs from most other well-studied binary alloy systems. Low free energy of Pd, strain relaxation, and interaction between Pd and Fe, are potentially responsible for the formation of this unusual surface. Adsorption of oxygen reversed the segregation trend and oxidized surface Fe. Ordered surface phases were observed after oxygen exposures at elevated temperatures. The reducing activity of Fe atoms in the alloy inhibited Pd oxidation, and weakened Pd-O interactions on Pd3Fe(111) are consistent with enhanced ORR kinetics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Coq, B. and Figueras, F., J. Molec. Catal. A: Chemical, 173, 117, 2001.Google Scholar
2 Enache, D. I., Edwards, J. K., Landon, P., Knight, D. W., Hutchings, G. J., and Hutchings, G. J., Science, 311, 362365, 2006.Google Scholar
3 Shao, M.-H., Sasaki, K., and Adzic, R. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 35263527, 2006.Google Scholar
4 Tao, F., Grass, M. E., Zhang, Y., Butcher, D. R., Renzas, J. R., Liu, Z., Chung, J. Y., Mun, B. S., Salmeron, M., and Somorjai, G. A., Science, 322, 932–324, 2008.Google Scholar
5 Stamenkovic, V. R., Mun, B. S., Arenz, M., Mayrhofer, K. J. J., Lucas, C. A., Wang, G., Ross, P. N., and Markovic, N. M., Nat. Mater., 6, 241246, 2007.Google Scholar
6 Zhou, W.-P., Yang, X., Vukmirovic, M. B., Koel, B. E., Jiao, J., Peng, G., Mavrikakis, M., and Adzic, R.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 1275512762, 2009.Google Scholar
7 Schmid, M. and Varga, P., Chem. Phys. Solid Surf., 10, 118151, 2002.Google Scholar
8 Schmid, M., Stadler, H., and Varga, P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 14411444, 1993.Google Scholar
9 Creemers, C. and Deurinck, P., Surf. Interface Anal., 25, 177189, 1997.Google Scholar
10 Michel, A. C., Lianos, L., Rousset, J. L., Delichere, P., and Bertolini, J. C., Surf. Sci., 416, 288294, 1998.Google Scholar
11 Bartels, L., Meyer, G., and Rieder, K. H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 697700, 1997.Google Scholar
12 Kuntz, J., Speller, S., Heiland, W., Atrei, A., , Spolveri Bardi, I., U. Phys. Rev. B, 58, 1600516008, 1998.Google Scholar