Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:26:24.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Egg-chamber development in the ovarioles of the fleshfly, Sarcophaga tibialis Macquart (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), during the first reproductive cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Elizabeth D. Kokwaro
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

A polytrophic ovariole of the fleshfly, Sarcophaga tibialis Macquart, is composed of two successively maturing egg chambers, each consisting of an oocyte, an interconnected cluster of 15 nurse cells, and an enveloping layer of follicle cells. The oocyte is established at the posterior end of the egg chamber. Nurse cell differentiation is characterized by nucleolar multiplication. At 25°C the first egg generation took approximately 8 days to develop. During this period, the growth rate of the egg chamber increased with time. A dramatic increase occurred during days 4–6, and was associated with the formation of large intercellular spaces between the follicle cells as well as an accumulation of numerous yolk globules. Completion of egg-chamber development was marked by the degeneration of the cluster of nurse cells and that of follicle cells.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abasa, R. O. (1972) Reproductive biology of Sarcophaga tibialis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)—II. Morphology of external and internal reproductive organs, ovary growth and oogenesis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 400405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (1964) Oocyte differentiation and vitellogenesis in the cockroach Periplaneta americana. J. Cell Biol. 20, 131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (1969) Oogenesis in the cockroach Periplaneta americana, with special reference to the specialization of the oolemma and the fate of coated vesicles. J. Microscop. 8, 721738.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. and Spielman, A. (1971) Permeability of the ovarian follicle of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J. Cell Biol. 50, 101221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, E. H. and King, R. C. (1964) Studies on the events resulting in the formation of an egg chamber in Drosophila melanogaster. Growth 28, 4181.Google ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, W. J. (1971) Follicle cell protein synthesis in moth oocytes. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 217232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F. (1978) Intercellular bridges in ovarian follicle cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tiss. Res. 186, 413422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, T., Morrison, P. E. and Davies, D. M. (1967) Cytological changes in the developing ovary of the housefly fed milk and other diets. Can. J. Zool. 46, 409420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayat, M. A. (1970) Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy. Biological Applications, Vol. 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Huebner, E. and Anderson, E. (1972) A cytological study of the ovary of Rhodnius prolixus—1. The ontogeny of the follicular epithelium. J. Morph. 136, 459494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, S. and Karnovsky, M. J. (1967) Formaldehyde–glutaraldehyde fixatives containing trinitro compounds. J. Cell Biol. 39, 168A.Google Scholar
King, R. C. (1970) Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
King, R. C. and Aggarwal, S. K. (1965) Oogenesis in Hyalophora cecropia. Growth 29, 1783.Google ScholarPubMed
King, R. C. and Devine, R. L. (1958) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster—VII. The submicroscopic morphology of the ovary. Growth 22, 299326.Google Scholar
King, R. G., Rubinson, A. C. and Smith, R. F. (1956) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Growth 20, 121157.Google ScholarPubMed
King, R. C. and Wolfsberg, M. F. (1957) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster-VI. A comparison of oogenesis among Drosophila melanogaster, virilis, pseudohscura and gibberosa. Growth 21, 281285.Google ScholarPubMed
Nørrevang, A. (1968) Electron microscopic morphology of oogenesis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 23, 114186.Google ScholarPubMed
Pantin, C. F. A. (1960) Notes on Microscopical Techniques for Zoologists. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Ramamurty, P. S. (1964) Distribution of RNA in the ooplasm of scorpion fly. Sei. Cull. 30, 459461.Google Scholar
Stay, B. (1965) Protein uptake in the oocytes of the cecropia moth. J. Cell Biol. 26, 4962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telfer, W. H. (1961) The route of entry and localization of blood proteins in the oocytes of saturniid moths. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 747759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telfer, W. H. and Smith, D. S. (1970) Aspects of egg formation, In Insect Ultrastructure (Ed. by Neville, A. C.), pp. 117134. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar