Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:12:43.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Compatibility Factor to Design High Efficiency Segmented Thermoelectric Generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

G. Jeffrey Snyder  and
T. Caillat
G. Jeffrey Snyder
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology 4800, Oak Grove Drive, MS 277–207, Pasadena, CA 91109
T. Caillat
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology 4800, Oak Grove Drive, MS 277–207, Pasadena, CA 91109
Get access

Abstract

Using thermoelectric compatibility, efficient thermoelectric generators are rationally designed. With examples, compatible and incompatible systems are explained and materials proposed for targeted development. The compatibility factor explains why segmentation of TAGS with SnTe or PbTe produces little extra power, while filled skutterudite increases the efficiency from 10.5% to 13.6%. High efficiency generators are designed with compatible n-type La2Te3, and similar p-type material, while incompatible SiGe alloys actually reduce the efficiency. A refractory metal with high p-type thermopower (> 100 μV/K) is required for development. The Chevrel compound Cu4Mo6Se8 is a compatible p-type metal that provides a modest increase in efficiency. A fully segmented generator using Bi2Te3-type, PbTe, TAGS, Zn4Sb3, skutterudite, La2Te3, and Chevrel compounds between 25° C and 1000° C will achieve 18.1% conversion efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 793: Symposium S – Thermoelectric Materials 2003 - Research and Applications , 2003 , S2.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Snyder, G. J. and Ursell, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 148301 (2003).Google Scholar
[2] Snyder, G. J., in Twenty-second International Conference on Thermoelectrics. Proceedings, ICT'03 (IEEE, La Grande Motte, France, 2003).Google Scholar
[3] Skrabek, E. A. and Trimmer, D. S., in Thermoelectric Handbook, edited by Rowe, D. M. (CRC, Boca Raton, 1995), p. 267.Google Scholar
[4] Wood, C., Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 459 (1988).Google Scholar
[5] Danielson, L. R., Raag, V., and Wood, C., in Proceedings of the 20th Inter society Energy Conversion Engineering Conference., 1985), Vol. 3, p. 531.Google Scholar
[6] Danielson, L., Alexander, M., Vining, C., Lockwood, A. D., and Wood, C., in Seventh International Conference on Thermoelectric Energy Conversion, edited by Rao, K. R. (University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX, USA, 1988), p. 71.Google Scholar
[7] Vining, C., Wood, C., Parker, J., Zoltan, A., Danielson, L., and Alexander, M., in Seventh International Conference on Thermoelectric Energy Conversion, edited by Rao, K. R. (University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX, USA, 1988), p. 9.Google Scholar
[8] Caillat, T., Fleurial, J.-P., and Snyder, G. J., Solid State Sciences 1, 535 (1999).Google Scholar
[9] Caillat, T. and Fleurial, J. P., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 1139 (1998).Google Scholar
[10] Yvon, K., Baillif, R., and Flukiger, R., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B-Struct. Commun. 35, 2859 (1979).Google Scholar