Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:31:45.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and consumer acceptability tests of fermented camel milk in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Zakaria Farah
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Dairy Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Thomas Streiff
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Dairy Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Marc R. Bachmann
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Dairy Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

Extract

There are estimated to be 600000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Kenya (Wandera, 1985). Almost 80% of these are kept by pastoral tribes living in arid areas in eastern and north-eastern parts of the country. In these regions, camels are important dairy animals. A camel in north-east Kenya can be expected to yield about 4 kg milk daily as compared with 0·5–1·5 kg for a cow in the same area. Most of the camel milk is consumed in the form of fermented milk. The milk is allowed to ferment naturally at ambient temperature and without prior heat treatment until it turns sour. The resulting fermented camel milk is known as Susa. Due to the spontaneous nature of the fermentation, this traditional method results in a product with varying taste and flavour and is often of poor hygienic quality, in addition, because of the limited scale of production, the product can be sold only in the immediate vicinity of the herd. For production of fermented milk under controlled conditions, thermophilic or mesophilic lactic acid cultures are normally used. In warm countries, mesophilic lactic cultured milk offers some advantages, as it can be incubated at ambient temperature (20–30 °C) and the fermentation stops at 1–1·2% lactic acid, eliminating the need for cooling to stop further souring as occurs in the case of yoghurt (Kurwijila, 1980).

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fleischmann, W. 1896 The Book of the Dairy, pp. 7172.Google Scholar
Kurwijila, R. L. N. 1980 Low cost optimization of the flavour, consistency and keeping quality of fermented milk with particular reference to consumer acceptibility in Kenya. M.Sc. Thesis, University of NairobiGoogle Scholar
Kurwijila, R. L. N. 1983 Maintenance of reactivated, lyophilised mixed type lactic cultures by subculturing and by cold storage. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 36 338343Google Scholar
Schulthess, W. 1988 [Appropriate milk product development-an example in Kenya.] Lebensmittel-Technologie 21 226228Google Scholar
Wandera, J. G. 1985 Camel pastoralism in Kenya. In Significance and Prospects of Camel Pastoralism in Kenya pp. 6162 (Ed. Migot-Adholla, S. E.), Nairobi, Kenya: Institute for Development StudiesGoogle Scholar