Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:14:38.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reassessment of the Effects of Broadcast and Line Sowing on the Fibre Yield of Jute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

P. Palit ,
A. C. Bhattacharyya  and
B. K. Samanta
P. Palit
Affiliation:
Jute Agricultural Research Institute, Barrackpore 743101, India
A. C. Bhattacharyya
Affiliation:
Jute Agricultural Research Institute, Barrackpore 743101, India
B. K. Samanta
Affiliation:
Jute Agricultural Research Institute, Barrackpore 743101, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Line sowing of jute has been advocated by some workers for the past 40 years as being more productive than the traditional broadcast method. But most cultivators still prefer broadcast sowing. A comparative study employing identical management practices showed that there is no significant difference in fibre yield per unit area between the two sowing methods. Under similar population pressures self-thinning is greater in line sown than in broadcast crops. Thus, provided similar seed rates and cultural conditions are maintained, farmers may use either sowing method.

P. Palit, A. C Bhattacharyya y B. K. Samanta: Re-evaluación de los efectos de la siembra al voleo y en lineas sobre el rendimiento defibra del yute.

Resumen

Resumen

La siembra en lineas del yute ha sido recomendada por algunos trabajadores durante los pasados 40 años por rendir más que el método tradicional de siembra al voleo. Pero la mayoria de los cultivadores prefieren todavia la siembra al voleo. Un estudio comparativo empleando regimenes idénticos de explotación demostro que no existe diferencia significativa en el rendimiento de fibra por unidad de área entre los dos métodos de siembra. Con presiones de población similares, el autoaclarado resulta ser mayor en cultivos sembrados en linea que en los sembrados al voleo. Por to tanto, siempre que se mantengan condiciones similares de cultivo y de proporción de semillas, los agricultores pueden usar cualquiera de los dos méltodos de siembra.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 471 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1946). Annual Report of Agricultural Research Scheme for 1945-46, 1–46. Calcutta: Indian Central Jute Committee.Google Scholar
Anon. (1949). Annual Report of Jute Agricultural Research Institute for 1948—49, 1–60. Calcutta: Indian Central Jute Committee.Google Scholar
Anon. (1985). Development programme and crop prospect review, April-June 1985. Jute Development Journal 5(S):5–11.Google Scholar
Basak, K. C. (1958). Study of the comparative economics of jute cultivation under the improved and traditional methods. Review of Researches and Investigations carried out by the Economic Research Section from 1947-48 to 1956-57, 59–67. Calcutta: Indian Central Jute Committee.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A. C & Palit, P. (1981). Mathematical approach to canopy architecture in relation to jute productivity. Annual Report for 1981, 74–75. Barrackpore: Jute Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1982). The importance of crop establishment. Annals of Applied Biology 101:411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, T. (1983). Handbook on Jute. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 51. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Gurnani, K. L. & Pathak, S. (1966). Efficiency of row cropping over broadcast in jute. Jute Bulletin 29:110–112.Google Scholar
Kundu, B. C. (1949). A short note on line sowing of jute. Jute Bulletin 12:168–169.Google Scholar
Kundu, B. C, Das, B. K. & Dua, D. B. (1955). Next time sow your jute in lines. Indian Farming 5(5):20– 23.Google Scholar
Kundu, B. C, Basak, K. C. & Sarkar, P. B. (1959). In Jute in India, 1–181. Calcutta: Indian Central Jute Committee.Google Scholar
Palit, P. & Bhattacharyya, A. C (1981). Germination and water uptake of jute seeds under water stress. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 19:848–852.Google Scholar
Palit, P. & Bhattacharyya, A. C. (1987). Interception of radiant energy, canopy photosynthesis and growth of cultivated jute. Photosynthetica 21:453–461.Google Scholar
Patel, J. S. & Ghose, R. L. M. (1940). A review of agricultural investigation on jute in India. Agricultural Research Bulletin No. 1, 1–51. Calcutta: Indian Central Jute Committee.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J., Currah, I. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1979). The effects of plant density, spatial arrangements and time of harvest on yield and root size on carrots. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95:431– 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanyal, A. T. (1952). Possibilities of growing jute as a line crop and development of a suitable jute seed drill. Jute Bulletin 15:3–8.Google Scholar
Sanyal, A. T. (1953). Possibilities of growing jute as a row crop. Jute Bulletin 15:506–517.Google Scholar
Saraswat, V. N. & Mukerjee, , Nirmalendu, (1984). Intensification of research on jute and mesta agronomy in India. Jute Development Journal 4(3):3O–37.Google Scholar